TSTP Solution File: GEO188+2 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO188+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:04:23 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.01s
% Output   : Solution 1.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8884/GEO188+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8884/GEO188+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8884/GEO188+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 8980
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.013 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart1)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart4)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))=>(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con1)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_lines(X4,X5))=>(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cu1)).
% fof(10, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)=>(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ceq2)).
% fof(13, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(14, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[13])).
% fof(15, plain,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(18, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[14,theory(equality)])).
% fof(19, plain,![X2]:~(distinct_points(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15])).
% cnf(20,plain,(~distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(21, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(22, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(distinct_points(X4,X6)|distinct_points(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21])).
% cnf(23,plain,(distinct_points(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)))|(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(25, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5)))|(distinct_points(X6,X4)&distinct_points(X6,X5)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((distinct_points(X6,X4)|~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))|~(distinct_points(X4,X5)))&((distinct_points(X6,X5)|~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))|~(distinct_points(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(27,plain,(distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(28,plain,(distinct_points(X3,X1)|~distinct_points(X1,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(32, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X4,X5)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(33, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(distinct_points(X6,X7))|~(distinct_lines(X8,X9)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)|apart_point_and_line(X6,X9))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X8))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X9))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(45, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))|(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(46, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X4,X5))|(distinct_lines(X5,X6)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[45])).
% cnf(47,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46])).
% fof(56, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))&apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(57, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((((distinct_points(X4,X5)&distinct_points(X4,X6))&distinct_points(X5,X6))&~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))&apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X6,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(58, negated_conjecture,((((distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)&distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0))&distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0))&~(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))))&apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[57])).
% cnf(59,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(60,negated_conjecture,(~apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(61,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(63,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(64,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)|distinct_points(esk3_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,61,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(72,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(78,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,X1)|distinct_points(X2,X1)|distinct_points(esk2_0,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,64,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(100,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)|distinct_points(X1,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,78,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(105,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)|distinct_points(X2,X1)|distinct_points(X2,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,100,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(111,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,72,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(123,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(X1,esk3_0)|distinct_points(X1,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,105,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(133,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,123,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(479,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[111,133,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1837,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,479,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1843,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1837,133,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1844,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1843,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1845,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1844,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1858,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,1845,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1860,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1858,133,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1861,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1860,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1862,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1861,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1872,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,1862,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1878,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,1872,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1882,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1878,63,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1883,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1882,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1884,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1883,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1889,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,1884,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1892,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1889,63,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1893,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1892,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1894,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1893,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1895,negated_conjecture,($false),1894,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 436
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 299
% # ...remaining for further processing: 137
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 2
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 1423
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1200
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 94
% # Paramodulations                    : 1125
% # Factorizations                     : 298
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 115
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 8
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 4
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 103
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 777
% # ...number of literals in the above : 4318
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5411
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2737
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    56 leaves,   1.91+/-1.902 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           32 leaves,   1.44+/-0.966 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           50 leaves,   1.60+/-1.217 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.113 s
% # System time            : 0.005 s
% # Total time             : 0.118 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.22 CPU 0.30 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.22 CPU 0.30 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8884/GEO188+2.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------