TSTP Solution File: GEO188+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  17 unt;  13 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   70 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc5,skc3),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc3,skc4),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ~ distinct_points(u,u),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | distinct_points(v,w)
    | distinct_points(u,w) ),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ distinct_points(w,x)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
    file('GEO188+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,19]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,19.0')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( distinct_points(skc4,u)
    | distinct_points(skc3,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,9.0')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,19]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,19.0')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,12]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,12.0')] ).

cnf(31,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,13.0')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,u)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc4,skc3),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,17]),
    [iquote('0:Res:7.0,17.0')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | distinct_lines(u,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:17.1,8.0')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    distinct_points(skc4,skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,4]),
    [iquote('0:Res:21.1,4.0')] ).

cnf(150,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[35,28]),
    [iquote('0:Res:35.1,28.0')] ).

cnf(153,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[150,31,30]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:150.2,150.3,31.0,30.0')] ).

cnf(214,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[33,20]),
    [iquote('0:Res:33.1,20.0')] ).

cnf(216,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[214,153]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:214.2,153.0')] ).

cnf(548,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc5,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[216]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:216.0,216.2')] ).

cnf(549,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[548,31]),
    [iquote('1:Res:548.1,31.0')] ).

cnf(556,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[549,30]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:549.0,30.0')] ).

cnf(557,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[216]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:556.0,216.1,216.3')] ).

cnf(558,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2s1)])],[557]),
    [iquote('2:Spt:557.0')] ).

cnf(559,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc4,skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[558,12]),
    [iquote('2:Res:558.0,12.1')] ).

cnf(563,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[559,42]),
    [iquote('2:MRR:559.0,42.0')] ).

cnf(564,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2sa)])],[563,558]),
    [iquote('2:Spt:563.0,557.0,558.0')] ).

cnf(565,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc4,skc3)),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2s2)])],[557]),
    [iquote('2:Spt:563.0,557.1')] ).

cnf(568,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(skc4,skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[565,13]),
    [iquote('2:Res:565.0,13.1')] ).

cnf(571,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[568,42]),
    [iquote('2:MRR:568.0,42.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:51:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.17/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.17/0.48  SPASS derived 488 clauses, backtracked 14 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 208 clauses.
% 0.17/0.48  SPASS allocated 85346 KBytes.
% 0.17/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.17/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.17/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.17/0.48  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.17/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.17/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  
% 0.17/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 33 :
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : con apart1 apart4 ci1 ci2 ceq2 cu1
% 0.17/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------