TSTP Solution File: GEO188+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:07:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.68 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.68 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.68 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.68 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.20/0.68 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.20/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 % File : GEO188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.20/0.68 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.20/0.68 % Problem : Collary to symmetry of incidence
% 0.20/0.68 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.20/0.68 % English : If X, Y, and Z are pairwise distinct, and Z is incident with
% 0.20/0.68 % the line connecting X and Y, then X is incident with the line
% 0.20/0.68 % connecting Z and Y.
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.20/0.68 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.20/0.68 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.20/0.68 % Names : Corollary 4.7.i [vPl95]
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.20/0.68 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.68 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of connectives : 34 ( 9 ~; 9 |; 4 &)
% 0.20/0.68 % ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.68 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.68 % Number of variables : 36 ( 36 !; 0 ?)
% 0.20/0.68 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.68
% 0.20/0.68 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.20/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.20/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.68 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.68 ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.20/0.68 ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.69 & distinct_points(X,Z)
% 0.20/0.69 & distinct_points(Y,Z)
% 0.20/0.69 & ~ apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
% 0.20/0.69 => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(Z,Y)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.69 %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.69 %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.20/0.69 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.20/0.69 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.69 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.20/0.69 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 8
% 0.20/0.69 %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 0.20/0.69 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.20/0.69 [2]P1(a1,a3)
% 0.20/0.69 [3]P1(a2,a3)
% 0.20/0.69 [4]P2(a1,f4(a3,a2))
% 0.20/0.69 [8]~P2(a3,f4(a1,a2))
% 0.20/0.69 [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.20/0.69 [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 0.20/0.69 [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 0.20/0.69 [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P2(x152,f4(x151,x152))
% 0.20/0.69 [16]~P1(x161,x162)+~P2(x161,f4(x161,x162))
% 0.20/0.69 [17]~P4(x171,x172)+~P2(f5(x171,x172),x172)
% 0.20/0.69 [18]~P4(x181,x182)+~P2(f5(x181,x182),x181)
% 0.20/0.69 [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 0.20/0.69 [10]~P2(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P2(x102,x103)
% 0.20/0.69 [11]~P3(x113,x111)+P3(x111,x112)+P3(x113,x112)
% 0.20/0.69 [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P3(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 0.20/0.69 [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 0.20/0.69 [14]~P4(x143,x141)+P4(x141,x142)+P4(x143,x142)
% 0.20/0.69 [19]P2(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P3(x193,x192)+P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x193)+P2(x194,x192)
% 0.20/0.69 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,9])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (~P2(a1,f4(a1,a2))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,9,16])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(24,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (~P2(a2,f4(a1,a2))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,9,16,15])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (~P1(a3,a2)+P2(a2,f4(a3,a2))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8,4,24,22,13,19,16])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (~P2(a2,f4(a2,a1))),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,16])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 (~P1(a3,a2)),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[29,15])).
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(56,plain,
% 0.20/0.69 ($false),
% 0.20/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[41,43,5,3,10,9]),
% 0.20/0.69 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.69 % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------