TSTP Solution File: GEO187+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO187+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.93s 4.03s
% Output   : Proof 31.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO187+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 17:03:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.58/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.58/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.58/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.58/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.58/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.58/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.58/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.58/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.58/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.58/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.58/0.58  
% 0.58/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.78/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.73/0.96  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.03/1.10  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.03/1.11  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.76/1.35  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.76/1.36  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.95/1.38  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.29/1.46  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.54/1.53  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.54/1.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.56/1.55  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.96/1.67  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.96/1.67  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.84/1.86  Prover 2: gave up
% 4.84/1.86  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.84/1.87  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.84/1.88  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.84/1.89  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.25/1.94  Prover 3: gave up
% 5.25/1.94  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 5.25/1.96  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.64/2.02  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.64/2.02  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.43/3.15  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.43/3.17  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 10.74/3.25  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.93/4.03  Prover 5: proved (874ms)
% 13.93/4.03  Prover 4: stopped
% 13.93/4.03  
% 13.93/4.03  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 13.93/4.03  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 13.93/4.03  
% 13.93/4.03  Generating proof ... found it (size 844)
% 30.30/8.41  
% 30.30/8.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 30.30/8.41  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 30.30/8.41  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v3) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v7) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v7) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))
% 30.54/8.47  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 30.54/8.47  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 30.54/8.47  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 30.54/8.47  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 30.54/8.47  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 30.54/8.47  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 30.54/8.47  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.54/8.48  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 30.54/8.48  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.54/8.48  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.54/8.48  | (10)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v3) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v7) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v7) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 & (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))
% 30.54/8.48  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 30.54/8.48  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.54/8.48  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 30.54/8.48  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 30.54/8.48  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 30.54/8.48  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 30.54/8.48  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 30.54/8.48  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 30.54/8.48  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 30.83/8.48  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 30.83/8.48  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 30.83/8.48  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.48  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 30.83/8.48  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 30.83/8.49  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 30.83/8.49  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.83/8.49  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 30.83/8.49  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 30.83/8.49  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 30.83/8.49  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.49  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0))
% 30.83/8.49  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 30.83/8.49  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 30.83/8.49  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.49  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.50  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 30.83/8.50  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.50  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.50  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 30.83/8.50  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating (10) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (47)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0) & line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5 & line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = all_1_0_0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0 & (all_1_0_0 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Applying alpha-rule on (47) yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (48) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = all_1_0_0
% 30.83/8.50  | (49) all_1_0_0 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0
% 30.83/8.50  | (50) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2
% 30.83/8.50  | (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  | (52) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1
% 30.83/8.50  | (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  | (54) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0
% 30.83/8.50  | (55) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5
% 30.83/8.50  | (56) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.50  | (57) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4
% 30.83/8.50  | (58) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_7_7 yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (59)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_9_9 yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (60)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = 0)
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_2_2, all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (61)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (62) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (63) all_1_3_3 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (64) all_1_3_3 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.50  |
% 30.83/8.50  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.50  | (65) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (66)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (45) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (67)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (45) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (69)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (44) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (70) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (71) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating (69) with all_16_0_10, all_16_1_11, all_16_2_12 yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (72) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_16_2_12 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10 & ( ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_12 = 0) | all_16_0_10 = 0)
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Applying alpha-rule on (72) yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11
% 30.83/8.51  | (74) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_16_2_12
% 30.83/8.51  | (75) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10
% 30.83/8.51  | (76)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_12 = 0) | all_16_0_10 = 0
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating (66) with all_18_0_13, all_18_1_14, all_18_2_15 yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (77) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_18_2_15 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_18_2_15) = all_18_1_14 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13 & ( ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0) | all_18_0_13 = 0)
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (78) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_18_2_15
% 30.83/8.51  | (79) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_18_2_15) = all_18_1_14
% 30.83/8.51  | (80) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13
% 30.83/8.51  | (81)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0) | all_18_0_13 = 0
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating (68) with all_20_0_16, all_20_1_17, all_20_2_18 yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (82) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_20_2_18 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_20_2_18) = all_20_1_17 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_20_0_16 & ( ~ (all_20_1_17 = 0) | all_20_0_16 = 0)
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Applying alpha-rule on (82) yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (83) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_20_2_18
% 30.83/8.51  | (84) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_20_2_18) = all_20_1_17
% 30.83/8.51  | (85) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_20_0_16
% 30.83/8.51  | (86)  ~ (all_20_1_17 = 0) | all_20_0_16 = 0
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Instantiating (67) with all_22_0_19, all_22_1_20, all_22_2_21 yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (87) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_22_1_20 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_22_2_21 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_22_0_19 & ( ~ (all_22_1_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_22_2_21 = 0) | all_22_0_19 = 0)
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  | Applying alpha-rule on (87) yields:
% 30.83/8.51  | (88) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_22_1_20
% 30.83/8.51  | (89) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_22_2_21
% 30.83/8.51  | (90) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_22_0_19
% 30.83/8.51  | (91)  ~ (all_22_1_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_22_2_21 = 0) | all_22_0_19 = 0
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (62), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.51  |-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.51  | (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  	| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 30.83/8.51  	| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.51  	|
% 30.83/8.51  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.51  |-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.51  | (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 30.83/8.51  | (95)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.51  |
% 30.83/8.51  	| Instantiating (95) with all_28_0_22, all_28_1_23, all_28_2_24, all_28_3_25 yields:
% 30.83/8.51  	| (96) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_22 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_1_23 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_28_2_24 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = all_28_3_25 & ( ~ (all_28_2_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_3_25 = 0) | all_28_0_22 = 0 | all_28_1_23 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  	|
% 30.83/8.52  	| Applying alpha-rule on (96) yields:
% 30.83/8.52  	| (97) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_28_2_24
% 30.83/8.52  	| (98) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = all_28_3_25
% 30.83/8.52  	| (99) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.52  	| (100)  ~ (all_28_2_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_3_25 = 0) | all_28_0_22 = 0 | all_28_1_23 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  	| (101) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_22
% 30.83/8.52  	|
% 30.83/8.52  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  	|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  	| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  	|
% 30.83/8.52  		| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 30.83/8.52  		| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  		|
% 30.83/8.52  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  	|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  	| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  	| (105)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  	|
% 30.83/8.52  		| Instantiating (105) with all_33_0_26, all_33_1_27, all_33_2_28, all_33_3_29 yields:
% 30.83/8.52  		| (106) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_0_26 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_1_27 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_33_2_28 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_33_3_29 & ( ~ (all_33_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_33_3_29 = 0) | all_33_0_26 = 0 | all_33_1_27 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  		|
% 30.83/8.52  		| Applying alpha-rule on (106) yields:
% 30.83/8.52  		| (107) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_33_2_28
% 30.83/8.52  		| (108) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_0_26
% 30.83/8.52  		| (109) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_33_3_29
% 30.83/8.52  		| (110)  ~ (all_33_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_33_3_29 = 0) | all_33_0_26 = 0 | all_33_1_27 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  		| (111) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_1_27
% 30.83/8.52  		|
% 30.83/8.52  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (70), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  		|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  		| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  		|
% 30.83/8.52  			| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 30.83/8.52  			| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  			|
% 30.83/8.52  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  		|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  		| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  		| (115)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  		|
% 30.83/8.52  			| Instantiating (115) with all_38_0_30, all_38_1_31, all_38_2_32 yields:
% 30.83/8.52  			| (116) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_0_30 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_1_31 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_38_2_32 & ( ~ (all_38_2_32 = 0) | all_38_0_30 = 0 | all_38_1_31 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  			|
% 30.83/8.52  			| Applying alpha-rule on (116) yields:
% 30.83/8.52  			| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_0_30
% 30.83/8.52  			| (118) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_1_31
% 30.83/8.52  			| (119) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_38_2_32
% 30.83/8.52  			| (120)  ~ (all_38_2_32 = 0) | all_38_0_30 = 0 | all_38_1_31 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  			|
% 30.83/8.52  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (71), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  			|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  			| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  			|
% 30.83/8.52  				| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 30.83/8.52  				| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  				|
% 30.83/8.52  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  			|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  			| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  			| (124)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  			|
% 30.83/8.52  				| Instantiating (124) with all_43_0_33, all_43_1_34, all_43_2_35 yields:
% 30.83/8.52  				| (125) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_0_33 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_1_34 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_43_2_35 & ( ~ (all_43_2_35 = 0) | all_43_0_33 = 0 | all_43_1_34 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  				|
% 30.83/8.52  				| Applying alpha-rule on (125) yields:
% 30.83/8.52  				| (126) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_0_33
% 30.83/8.52  				| (127) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_1_34
% 30.83/8.52  				| (128) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_43_2_35
% 30.83/8.52  				| (129)  ~ (all_43_2_35 = 0) | all_43_0_33 = 0 | all_43_1_34 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  				|
% 30.83/8.52  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  				|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  				| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  				|
% 30.83/8.52  					| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 30.83/8.52  					| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  					|
% 30.83/8.52  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  				|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  				| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  				| (133) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  				|
% 30.83/8.52  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (64), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  					|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  					| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  					|
% 30.83/8.52  						| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 30.83/8.52  						| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  						|
% 30.83/8.52  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  					|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  					| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  					| (137) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  					|
% 30.83/8.52  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (133), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.52  						|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.52  						| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 30.83/8.52  						|
% 30.83/8.52  							| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 30.83/8.52  							| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.52  							|
% 30.83/8.52  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.52  						|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.52  						| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 30.83/8.52  						| (141)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.52  						|
% 30.83/8.52  							| Instantiating (141) with all_55_0_36, all_55_1_37, all_55_2_38, all_55_3_39 yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (142) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_55_1_37 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_55_0_36 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_55_2_38 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_55_3_39 & ( ~ (all_55_2_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_55_3_39 = 0) | all_55_0_36 = 0 | all_55_1_37 = 0)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Applying alpha-rule on (142) yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (143)  ~ (all_55_2_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_55_3_39 = 0) | all_55_0_36 = 0 | all_55_1_37 = 0
% 30.83/8.53  							| (144) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_55_2_38
% 30.83/8.53  							| (145) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_55_0_36
% 30.83/8.53  							| (146) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_55_1_37
% 30.83/8.53  							| (147) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_55_3_39
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_18_2_15, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_18_2_15, line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (148) all_18_2_15 = all_1_5_5
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_20_2_18, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_20_2_18, line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (149) all_20_2_18 = all_1_2_2
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5, all_22_1_20, all_18_1_14 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_22_1_20, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (150) all_22_1_20 = all_18_1_14 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_43_0_33, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (151) all_43_0_33 = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_43_1_34, all_55_1_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_55_1_37, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_1_34, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (152) all_55_1_37 = all_43_1_34
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_28_0_22, all_43_0_33 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_22, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (153) all_43_0_33 = all_28_0_22
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_28_0_22, all_43_1_34 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_43_1_34, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_22, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (154) all_43_1_34 = all_28_0_22
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_28_1_23, all_55_1_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_55_1_37, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_28_1_23, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (155) all_55_1_37 = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_16_1_11, all_20_1_17 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (156) all_20_1_17 = all_16_1_11 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_20_1_17)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_38_0_30, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (157) all_38_0_30 = all_1_4_4
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_38_0_30, all_55_0_36 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_55_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_0_30, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (158) all_55_0_36 = all_38_0_30
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_38_1_31, all_55_0_36 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_55_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_1_31, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (159) all_55_0_36 = all_38_1_31
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_33_0_26, all_38_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_38_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_0_26, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (160) all_38_0_30 = all_33_0_26
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_33_1_27, all_55_0_36 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_55_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_33_1_27, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (161) all_55_0_36 = all_33_1_27
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_22_2_21, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_22_2_21, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (162) all_22_2_21 = 0
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Using (90) and (59) yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (163)  ~ (all_22_0_19 = 0)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7, all_18_0_13, all_22_0_19 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_22_0_19, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (164) all_22_0_19 = all_18_0_13
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_8_8 yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (165)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = 0)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_16_2_12, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_16_2_12, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (166) all_16_2_12 = 0
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9, all_20_0_16, all_33_3_29 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_33_3_29, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_20_0_16, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (167) all_33_3_29 = all_20_0_16
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Using (85) and (60) yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (168)  ~ (all_20_0_16 = 0)
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9, all_16_0_10, all_33_3_29 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_33_3_29, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10, yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (169) all_33_3_29 = all_16_0_10
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Combining equations (161,159) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (170) all_38_1_31 = all_33_1_27
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Combining equations (158,159) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (171) all_38_0_30 = all_38_1_31
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Simplifying 171 yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (172) all_38_0_30 = all_38_1_31
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Combining equations (152,155) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (173) all_43_1_34 = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Simplifying 173 yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (174) all_43_1_34 = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Combining equations (153,151) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (175) all_28_0_22 = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Simplifying 175 yields:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (176) all_28_0_22 = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.53  							|
% 30.83/8.53  							| Combining equations (154,174) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.53  							| (177) all_28_0_22 = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Simplifying 177 yields:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (178) all_28_0_22 = all_28_1_23
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (157,160) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (179) all_33_0_26 = all_1_4_4
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (172,160) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (180) all_38_1_31 = all_33_0_26
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Simplifying 180 yields:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (181) all_38_1_31 = all_33_0_26
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (181,170) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (182) all_33_0_26 = all_33_1_27
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Simplifying 182 yields:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (183) all_33_0_26 = all_33_1_27
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (179,183) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (184) all_33_1_27 = all_1_4_4
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (169,167) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (185) all_20_0_16 = all_16_0_10
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Combining equations (178,176) yields a new equation:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (186) all_28_1_23 = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Simplifying 186 yields:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (187) all_28_1_23 = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Equations (164) can reduce 163 to:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (188)  ~ (all_18_0_13 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| Equations (185) can reduce 168 to:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (189)  ~ (all_16_0_10 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (148) and (78) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (55) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (149) and (83) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (50) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (148) and (79) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (187) and (99) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (56) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (149) and (84) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (194) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_20_1_17
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (184) and (111) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (57) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (162) and (89) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (58) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (164) and (90) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (80) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (166) and (74) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (54) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							| From (185) and (85) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (75) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (86), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.54  							|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.54  							| (200)  ~ (all_20_1_17 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  							|
% 30.83/8.54  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (91), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.54  								|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.54  								| (201)  ~ (all_22_1_20 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  								|
% 30.83/8.54  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.54  									|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.54  									| (202)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_20_1_17)
% 30.83/8.54  									|
% 30.83/8.54  										| Using (194) and (202) yields:
% 30.83/8.54  										| (203) $false
% 30.83/8.54  										|
% 30.83/8.54  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.54  									|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.54  									| (194) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_20_1_17
% 30.83/8.54  									| (205) all_20_1_17 = all_16_1_11
% 30.83/8.54  									|
% 30.83/8.54  										| Equations (205) can reduce 200 to:
% 30.83/8.54  										| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  										|
% 30.83/8.54  										| From (205) and (194) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  										| (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11
% 30.83/8.54  										|
% 30.83/8.54  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (150), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.54  										|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.54  										| (208)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14)
% 30.83/8.54  										|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Using (192) and (208) yields:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (203) $false
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.54  										|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.54  										| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14
% 30.83/8.54  										| (211) all_22_1_20 = all_18_1_14
% 30.83/8.54  										|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Equations (211) can reduce 201 to:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											| From (211) and (88) follows:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Using (98) and (165) yields:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (214)  ~ (all_28_3_25 = 0)
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Instantiating formula (23) with all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, yields:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (215) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = 0) | distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_18_1_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 30.83/8.54  											| (216) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.54  											|
% 30.83/8.54  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (217) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_18_1_14, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (218) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_4_4, all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (219) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_18_1_14, all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (220) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (24) with all_16_1_11, all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (221) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0) | distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (222) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_16_1_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (223) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_16_1_11, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (224) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (225) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_16_1_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (226) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_4_4, all_16_1_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (227) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (228) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_4_4, all_16_1_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (229) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.55  											|
% 30.83/8.55  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_16_1_11, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.55  											| (230) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (231) all_16_1_11 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_18_1_14, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (232) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_18_1_14, all_16_1_11, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (233) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_16_1_11, all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (234) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_18_1_14, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (235) all_18_1_14 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_16_1_11, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (236) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (237) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_18_0_13, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (238) all_18_0_13 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_18_0_13, 0, all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (239) all_18_0_13 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_18_0_13, all_18_0_13, all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = all_18_0_13, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (240) all_18_0_13 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (21) with all_28_3_25, all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = all_28_3_25, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (241)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.56  											|
% 30.83/8.56  											| Instantiating formula (45) with all_28_3_25, all_1_2_2, all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_8_8) = all_28_3_25, yields:
% 30.83/8.56  											| (242)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_16_0_10, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10, yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (243) all_16_0_10 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_16_0_10, 0, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10, yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (244) all_16_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_16_0_10, all_16_0_10, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_16_0_10, yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (245) all_16_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Instantiating (242) with all_98_0_40, all_98_1_41, all_98_2_42 yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (246) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_98_0_40 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_98_2_42 & ( ~ (all_98_1_41 = 0) |  ~ (all_98_2_42 = 0) | (all_98_0_40 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0))
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Applying alpha-rule on (246) yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (247) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41
% 30.83/8.57  											| (248) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_98_0_40
% 30.83/8.57  											| (249) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_98_2_42
% 30.83/8.57  											| (250)  ~ (all_98_1_41 = 0) |  ~ (all_98_2_42 = 0) | (all_98_0_40 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Instantiating (241) with all_100_0_43, all_100_1_44, all_100_2_45 yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (251) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_100_2_45 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_100_2_45) = all_100_1_44 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_100_0_43 & ( ~ (all_100_1_44 = 0) | (all_100_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0))
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											| Applying alpha-rule on (251) yields:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (252) line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_100_2_45
% 30.83/8.57  											| (253) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_100_2_45) = all_100_1_44
% 30.83/8.57  											| (254) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_100_0_43
% 30.83/8.57  											| (255)  ~ (all_100_1_44 = 0) | (all_100_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  											|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  											| (256) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0
% 30.83/8.57  											|
% 30.83/8.57  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  												|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  												| (257) all_16_0_10 = 0
% 30.83/8.57  												|
% 30.83/8.57  													| Equations (257) can reduce 189 to:
% 30.83/8.57  													| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.57  													|
% 30.83/8.57  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.57  												|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.57  												| (189)  ~ (all_16_0_10 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  												| (260)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.57  												|
% 30.83/8.57  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  													|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  													| (261) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 30.83/8.57  													|
% 30.83/8.57  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  														|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  														| (262)  ~ (all_100_1_44 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  														|
% 30.83/8.57  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  															|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  															| (257) all_16_0_10 = 0
% 30.83/8.57  															|
% 30.83/8.57  																| Equations (257) can reduce 189 to:
% 30.83/8.57  																| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.57  																|
% 30.83/8.57  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.57  															|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.57  															| (189)  ~ (all_16_0_10 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  															| (266)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 30.83/8.57  															|
% 30.83/8.57  																| Instantiating (266) with all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_127_2_54 yields:
% 30.83/8.57  																| (267) line_connecting(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_127_1_53 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_127_2_54 & ( ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0) |  ~ (all_127_2_54 = 0))
% 30.83/8.57  																|
% 30.83/8.57  																| Applying alpha-rule on (267) yields:
% 30.83/8.57  																| (268) line_connecting(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_127_1_53
% 30.83/8.57  																| (269) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52
% 30.83/8.57  																| (270) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_127_2_54
% 30.83/8.57  																| (271)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0) |  ~ (all_127_2_54 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  																|
% 30.83/8.57  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 30.83/8.57  																|-Branch one:
% 30.83/8.57  																| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 30.83/8.57  																|
% 30.83/8.57  																	| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 30.83/8.57  																	| (93) $false
% 30.83/8.57  																	|
% 30.83/8.57  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 30.83/8.57  																|-Branch two:
% 30.83/8.57  																| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 30.83/8.57  																| (275)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 30.83/8.57  																|
% 30.83/8.57  																	| Instantiating (275) with all_132_0_55, all_132_1_56, all_132_2_57 yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (276) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_55 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_56 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_132_2_57 & ( ~ (all_132_2_57 = 0) | all_132_0_55 = 0 | all_132_1_56 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																	|
% 31.29/8.58  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (276) yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (277) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_132_0_55
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (278) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_56
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (279) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_132_2_57
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (280)  ~ (all_132_2_57 = 0) | all_132_0_55 = 0 | all_132_1_56 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																	|
% 31.29/8.58  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																	|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																	|
% 31.29/8.58  																		| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																		| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																		|
% 31.29/8.58  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																	|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																	| (284)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																	|
% 31.29/8.58  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																		|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																		| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																		|
% 31.29/8.58  																			| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																			|
% 31.29/8.58  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																		|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																		| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																		| (288)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																		|
% 31.29/8.58  																			| Instantiating (288) with all_142_0_61, all_142_1_62, all_142_2_63, all_142_3_64 yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (289) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_0_61 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_1_62 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_142_2_63 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_142_3_64 & ( ~ (all_142_2_63 = 0) |  ~ (all_142_3_64 = 0) | all_142_0_61 = 0 | all_142_1_62 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																			|
% 31.29/8.58  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (289) yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (290) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_1_62
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (291) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_0_61
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (292) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_142_3_64
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (293) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_142_2_63
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (294)  ~ (all_142_2_63 = 0) |  ~ (all_142_3_64 = 0) | all_142_0_61 = 0 | all_142_1_62 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																			|
% 31.29/8.58  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																			|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (295) all_18_0_13 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																			|
% 31.29/8.58  																				| Equations (295) can reduce 188 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																				| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																				|
% 31.29/8.58  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																			|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (188)  ~ (all_18_0_13 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																			| (298)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.29/8.58  																			|
% 31.29/8.58  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																				|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																				| (295) all_18_0_13 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																				|
% 31.29/8.58  																					| Equations (295) can reduce 188 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																					|
% 31.29/8.58  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																				|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																				| (188)  ~ (all_18_0_13 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																				| (302)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.29/8.58  																				|
% 31.29/8.58  																					| Instantiating (302) with all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_152_2_70 yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (303) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_1_69 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_2_70 & ( ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0) |  ~ (all_152_2_70 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																					|
% 31.29/8.58  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (303) yields:
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (304) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_1_69
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (305) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (306) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_2_70
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (307)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0) |  ~ (all_152_2_70 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																					|
% 31.29/8.58  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																					|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																					|
% 31.29/8.58  																						| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																						| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																						|
% 31.29/8.58  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																					|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																					| (311) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																					|
% 31.29/8.58  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																						|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																						| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																						|
% 31.29/8.58  																							| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																							| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																							|
% 31.29/8.58  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																						|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																						| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																						| (315) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																						|
% 31.29/8.58  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																							|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																							| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																							|
% 31.29/8.58  																								| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																								| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																								|
% 31.29/8.58  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																							|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																							| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																							| (319) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																							|
% 31.29/8.58  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																								|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																								| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																								|
% 31.29/8.58  																									| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																									| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																									|
% 31.29/8.58  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																								|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																								| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																								| (323) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																								|
% 31.29/8.58  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																									|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																									| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																									|
% 31.29/8.58  																										| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																										| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																										|
% 31.29/8.58  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																									|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																									| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																									| (327) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.29/8.58  																									|
% 31.29/8.58  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.58  																										|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.58  																										| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.58  																										|
% 31.29/8.58  																											| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.58  																											| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.58  																											|
% 31.29/8.58  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.58  																										|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.58  																										| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.58  																										| (331) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																										|
% 31.29/8.59  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																											|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																											| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																											|
% 31.29/8.59  																												| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																												| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																												|
% 31.29/8.59  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																											|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																											| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																											| (335) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																											|
% 31.29/8.59  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																												|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																												| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																												|
% 31.29/8.59  																													| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																													| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																													|
% 31.29/8.59  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																												|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																												| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																												| (339) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																												|
% 31.29/8.59  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																													|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																													| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																													|
% 31.29/8.59  																														| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																														| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																														|
% 31.29/8.59  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																													|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																													| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																													| (343) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																													|
% 31.29/8.59  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																														|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																														| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																														|
% 31.29/8.59  																															| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																															| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																															|
% 31.29/8.59  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																														|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																														| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																														| (347) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																														|
% 31.29/8.59  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																															|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																															| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																															|
% 31.29/8.59  																																| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																																| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																																|
% 31.29/8.59  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																															|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																															| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																															| (351) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																															|
% 31.29/8.59  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (235), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																																|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																																| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																																|
% 31.29/8.59  																																	| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																																	| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																																|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																																| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																																| (355) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																																|
% 31.29/8.59  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																																	| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|
% 31.29/8.59  																																		| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																																		| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																																	| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																																	| (359) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																																	|
% 31.29/8.59  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																																		| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|
% 31.29/8.59  																																			| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																																			| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																																			|
% 31.29/8.59  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																																		| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																																		| (363) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.29/8.59  																																		|
% 31.29/8.59  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 31.29/8.59  																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.29/8.59  																																			| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.29/8.59  																																			|
% 31.29/8.59  																																				| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.29/8.59  																																				| (93) $false
% 31.29/8.59  																																				|
% 31.29/8.59  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.29/8.59  																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.29/8.59  																																			| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.29/8.59  																																			| (367) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																			|
% 31.37/8.59  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.59  																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.59  																																				| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																				|
% 31.37/8.59  																																					| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.37/8.59  																																					| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.59  																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.59  																																				| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																				| (371) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																				|
% 31.37/8.59  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.59  																																					| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|
% 31.37/8.59  																																						| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.37/8.59  																																						| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.59  																																					| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																					| (375) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																					|
% 31.37/8.59  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.59  																																						| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|
% 31.37/8.59  																																							| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.37/8.59  																																							| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.59  																																						| (212)  ~ (all_18_1_14 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																						| (379) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																						|
% 31.37/8.59  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (311), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.59  																																							| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.59  																																							| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																							| (383)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																							|
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| Instantiating (383) with all_217_0_72, all_217_1_73, all_217_2_74, all_217_3_75 yields:
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (384) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_217_1_73 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_217_0_72 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_217_2_74 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_217_3_75 & ( ~ (all_217_2_74 = 0) |  ~ (all_217_3_75 = 0) | all_217_0_72 = 0 | all_217_1_73 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (384) yields:
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (385) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_217_2_74
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (386)  ~ (all_217_2_74 = 0) |  ~ (all_217_3_75 = 0) | all_217_0_72 = 0 | all_217_1_73 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (387) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_217_0_72
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (388) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_217_1_73
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (389) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_217_3_75
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|
% 31.37/8.59  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (315), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|
% 31.37/8.59  																																									| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.37/8.59  																																									| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.59  																																									|
% 31.37/8.59  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.37/8.59  																																								| (393)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.59  																																								|
% 31.37/8.59  																																									| Instantiating (393) with all_222_0_76, all_222_1_77, all_222_2_78, all_222_3_79 yields:
% 31.37/8.59  																																									| (394) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_222_0_76 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_77 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_222_3_79 & ( ~ (all_222_2_78 = 0) |  ~ (all_222_3_79 = 0) | all_222_0_76 = 0 | all_222_1_77 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (394) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (395) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (396)  ~ (all_222_2_78 = 0) |  ~ (all_222_3_79 = 0) | all_222_0_76 = 0 | all_222_1_77 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (397) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_222_3_79
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (398) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_77
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (399) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_222_0_76
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|
% 31.37/8.60  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (319), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																									| (403)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																									|
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| Instantiating (403) with all_227_0_80, all_227_1_81, all_227_2_82, all_227_3_83 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (404) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_227_1_81 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_227_0_80 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_227_2_82 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_227_3_83 & ( ~ (all_227_2_82 = 0) |  ~ (all_227_3_83 = 0) | all_227_0_80 = 0 | all_227_1_81 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (404) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (405) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_227_0_80
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (406) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_227_2_82
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (407) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_227_1_81
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (408)  ~ (all_227_2_82 = 0) |  ~ (all_227_3_83 = 0) | all_227_0_80 = 0 | all_227_1_81 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (409) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_227_3_83
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|
% 31.37/8.60  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (323), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																										| (413)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																										|
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| Instantiating (413) with all_232_0_84, all_232_1_85, all_232_2_86, all_232_3_87 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (414) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_232_0_84 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_232_1_85 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_232_2_86 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_232_3_87 & ( ~ (all_232_2_86 = 0) |  ~ (all_232_3_87 = 0) | all_232_0_84 = 0 | all_232_1_85 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (414) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (415) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_232_2_86
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (416)  ~ (all_232_2_86 = 0) |  ~ (all_232_3_87 = 0) | all_232_0_84 = 0 | all_232_1_85 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (417) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_232_3_87
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (418) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_232_1_85
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (419) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_232_0_84
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|
% 31.37/8.60  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (327), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																											| (423)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																											|
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| Instantiating (423) with all_237_0_88, all_237_1_89, all_237_2_90 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (424) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_237_0_88 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_237_1_89 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_237_2_90 & ( ~ (all_237_2_90 = 0) | all_237_0_88 = 0 | all_237_1_89 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (424) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (425) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_237_0_88
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (426) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_237_1_89
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (427) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_237_2_90
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (428)  ~ (all_237_2_90 = 0) | all_237_0_88 = 0 | all_237_1_89 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|
% 31.37/8.60  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (331), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																												| (432)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																												|
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| Instantiating (432) with all_242_0_91, all_242_1_92, all_242_2_93 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (433) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_242_1_92 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_242_0_91 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_242_2_93 & ( ~ (all_242_2_93 = 0) | all_242_0_91 = 0 | all_242_1_92 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (433) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (434) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_242_1_92
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (435) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_242_0_91
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (436) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_242_2_93
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (437)  ~ (all_242_2_93 = 0) | all_242_0_91 = 0 | all_242_1_92 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|
% 31.37/8.60  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (335), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																													| (441)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																													|
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| Instantiating (441) with all_247_0_94, all_247_1_95, all_247_2_96, all_247_3_97 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (442) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_247_1_95 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_247_0_94 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_247_2_96 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_247_3_97 & ( ~ (all_247_2_96 = 0) |  ~ (all_247_3_97 = 0) | all_247_0_94 = 0 | all_247_1_95 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (442) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (443) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_247_1_95
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (444) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_247_0_94
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (445) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_247_2_96
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (446)  ~ (all_247_2_96 = 0) |  ~ (all_247_3_97 = 0) | all_247_0_94 = 0 | all_247_1_95 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (447) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_247_3_97
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|
% 31.37/8.60  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																														| (451)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																														|
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| Instantiating (451) with all_252_0_98, all_252_1_99, all_252_2_100, all_252_3_101 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (452) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_252_1_99 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_252_0_98 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_252_2_100 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_252_3_101 & ( ~ (all_252_2_100 = 0) |  ~ (all_252_3_101 = 0) | all_252_0_98 = 0 | all_252_1_99 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (452) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (453) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_252_1_99
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (454) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_252_2_100
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (455)  ~ (all_252_2_100 = 0) |  ~ (all_252_3_101 = 0) | all_252_0_98 = 0 | all_252_1_99 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (456) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_252_3_101
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (457) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_252_0_98
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|
% 31.37/8.60  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (343), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																															| (461)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.60  																																															|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| Instantiating (461) with all_257_0_102, all_257_1_103, all_257_2_104, all_257_3_105 yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (462) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_257_1_103 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_257_0_102 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_257_2_104 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_257_3_105 & ( ~ (all_257_2_104 = 0) |  ~ (all_257_3_105 = 0) | all_257_0_102 = 0 | all_257_1_103 = 0)
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (462) yields:
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (463) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_257_2_104
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (464) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_257_3_105
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (465) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_257_1_103
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (466)  ~ (all_257_2_104 = 0) |  ~ (all_257_3_105 = 0) | all_257_0_102 = 0 | all_257_1_103 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (467) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_257_0_102
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (347), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.60  																																																| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																	| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.60  																																																	| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.60  																																																	|
% 31.37/8.60  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.60  																																																|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																| (471)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| Instantiating (471) with all_262_0_106, all_262_1_107, all_262_2_108, all_262_3_109 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (472) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_262_0_106 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_262_1_107 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_262_2_108 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_262_3_109 & ( ~ (all_262_2_108 = 0) |  ~ (all_262_3_109 = 0) | all_262_0_106 = 0 | all_262_1_107 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (472) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (473)  ~ (all_262_2_108 = 0) |  ~ (all_262_3_109 = 0) | all_262_0_106 = 0 | all_262_1_107 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (474) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_262_3_109
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (475) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_262_0_106
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (476) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_262_2_108
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (477) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_262_1_107
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (351), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	| (481)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																	|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| Instantiating (481) with all_267_0_110, all_267_1_111, all_267_2_112, all_267_3_113 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (482) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_267_0_110 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_267_1_111 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_267_2_112 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_267_3_113 & ( ~ (all_267_2_112 = 0) |  ~ (all_267_3_113 = 0) | all_267_0_110 = 0 | all_267_1_111 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (482) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (483) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_267_2_112
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (484) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_267_0_110
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (485) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = all_267_3_113
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (486)  ~ (all_267_2_112 = 0) |  ~ (all_267_3_113 = 0) | all_267_0_110 = 0 | all_267_1_111 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (487) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_267_1_111
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (355), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (206)  ~ (all_16_1_11 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		| (491)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																		|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| Instantiating (491) with all_272_0_114, all_272_1_115, all_272_2_116, all_272_3_117 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (492) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_272_0_114 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_272_1_115 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_272_2_116 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_272_3_117 & ( ~ (all_272_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_272_3_117 = 0) | all_272_0_114 = 0 | all_272_1_115 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (492) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (493) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_272_3_117
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (494)  ~ (all_272_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_272_3_117 = 0) | all_272_0_114 = 0 | all_272_1_115 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (495) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_272_1_115
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (496) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_272_0_114
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (497) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_272_2_116
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (359), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			| (501)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																			|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| Instantiating (501) with all_277_0_118, all_277_1_119, all_277_2_120, all_277_3_121 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (502) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_277_1_119 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_277_0_118 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_277_2_120 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_277_3_121 & ( ~ (all_277_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_277_3_121 = 0) | all_277_0_118 = 0 | all_277_1_119 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (502) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (503) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_277_1_119
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (504) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_277_0_118
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (505) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_277_3_121
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (506) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_277_2_120
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (507)  ~ (all_277_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_277_3_121 = 0) | all_277_0_118 = 0 | all_277_1_119 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (363), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				| (511)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																				|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| Instantiating (511) with all_282_0_122, all_282_1_123, all_282_2_124, all_282_3_125 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (512) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_282_0_122 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_282_1_123 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_282_2_124 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_282_3_125 & ( ~ (all_282_2_124 = 0) |  ~ (all_282_3_125 = 0) | all_282_0_122 = 0 | all_282_1_123 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (512) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (513) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_282_3_125
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (514) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_282_1_123
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (515) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_282_0_122
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (516)  ~ (all_282_2_124 = 0) |  ~ (all_282_3_125 = 0) | all_282_0_122 = 0 | all_282_1_123 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (517) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_282_2_124
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					| (521)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																					|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| Instantiating (521) with all_287_0_126, all_287_1_127, all_287_2_128, all_287_3_129 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (522) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_287_1_127 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_287_0_126 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_287_2_128 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = all_287_3_129 & ( ~ (all_287_2_128 = 0) |  ~ (all_287_3_129 = 0) | all_287_0_126 = 0 | all_287_1_127 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (522) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (523)  ~ (all_287_2_128 = 0) |  ~ (all_287_3_129 = 0) | all_287_0_126 = 0 | all_287_1_127 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (524) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_287_2_128
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (525) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_287_0_126
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (526) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_287_1_127
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (527) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = all_287_3_129
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (371), into two cases.
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (93) $false
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						| (531)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.37/8.61  																																																						|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| Instantiating (531) with all_292_0_130, all_292_1_131, all_292_2_132, all_292_3_133 yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (532) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_292_0_130 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_292_1_131 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_292_2_132 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_292_3_133 & ( ~ (all_292_2_132 = 0) |  ~ (all_292_3_133 = 0) | all_292_0_130 = 0 | all_292_1_131 = 0)
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							|
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (532) yields:
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (533) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_292_1_131
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (534) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_292_0_130
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (535)  ~ (all_292_2_132 = 0) |  ~ (all_292_3_133 = 0) | all_292_0_130 = 0 | all_292_1_131 = 0
% 31.37/8.61  																																																							| (536) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_292_2_132
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							| (537) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_292_3_133
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (375), into two cases.
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							| (92) all_1_3_3 = 0
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| Equations (92) can reduce 51 to:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (93) $false
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							| (51)  ~ (all_1_3_3 = 0)
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							| (541)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.48/8.61  																																																							|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| Instantiating (541) with all_297_0_134, all_297_1_135, all_297_2_136, all_297_3_137 yields:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (542) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_297_0_134 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_297_1_135 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_297_2_136 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = all_297_3_137 & ( ~ (all_297_2_136 = 0) |  ~ (all_297_3_137 = 0) | all_297_0_134 = 0 | all_297_1_135 = 0)
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (542) yields:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (543)  ~ (all_297_2_136 = 0) |  ~ (all_297_3_137 = 0) | all_297_0_134 = 0 | all_297_1_135 = 0
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (544) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_297_1_135
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (545) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_297_2_136
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (546) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = all_297_3_137
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_297_0_134
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (379), into two cases.
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									| (93) $false
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								| (551)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.48/8.61  																																																								|
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									| Instantiating (551) with all_302_0_138, all_302_1_139, all_302_2_140, all_302_3_141 yields:
% 31.48/8.61  																																																									| (552) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_302_1_139 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_302_0_138 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_302_2_140 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_302_3_141 & ( ~ (all_302_2_140 = 0) |  ~ (all_302_3_141 = 0) | all_302_0_138 = 0 | all_302_1_139 = 0)
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (552) yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (553) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = all_302_3_141
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (554) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_302_2_140
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (555) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_302_1_139
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (556) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_302_0_138
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (557)  ~ (all_302_2_140 = 0) |  ~ (all_302_3_141 = 0) | all_302_0_138 = 0 | all_302_1_139 = 0
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_100_2_45, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_100_2_45, line_connecting(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (558) all_100_2_45 = all_1_2_2
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5, all_132_1_56, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_56, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (559) all_132_1_56 = all_1_0_0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0)
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2, all_252_1_99, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_252_1_99, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (560) all_252_1_99 = all_1_1_1
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2, all_252_1_99, all_272_0_114 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_272_0_114, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_252_1_99, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (561) all_272_0_114 = all_252_1_99
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2, all_222_0_76, all_272_0_114 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_272_0_114, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_222_0_76, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (562) all_272_0_114 = all_222_0_76
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2, all_217_1_73, all_252_1_99 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_252_1_99, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_217_1_73, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (563) all_252_1_99 = all_217_1_73
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5, all_297_0_134, all_18_1_14 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_297_0_134, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (564) all_297_0_134 = all_18_1_14
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5, all_297_0_134, all_302_1_139 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_302_1_139, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_297_0_134, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (565) all_302_1_139 = all_297_0_134
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5, all_292_0_130, all_302_1_139 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_302_1_139, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_292_0_130, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (566) all_302_1_139 = all_292_0_130
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5, all_287_1_127, all_297_0_134 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_297_0_134, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_287_1_127, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (567) all_297_0_134 = all_287_1_127
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2, all_277_1_119, all_100_1_44 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_277_1_119, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (568) all_277_1_119 = all_100_1_44 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_44)
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2, all_277_1_119, all_282_0_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_282_0_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_277_1_119, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (569) all_282_0_122 = all_277_1_119
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2, all_242_1_92, all_282_0_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_282_0_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_242_1_92, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (570) all_282_0_122 = all_242_1_92
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2, all_237_0_88, all_282_0_122 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_282_0_122, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_237_0_88, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (571) all_282_0_122 = all_237_0_88
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2, all_98_1_41, all_242_1_92 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_242_1_92, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (572) all_242_1_92 = all_98_1_41
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_287_0_126, all_297_1_135 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_297_1_135, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_287_0_126, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (573) all_297_1_135 = all_287_0_126
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_242_0_91, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_242_0_91, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (574) all_242_0_91 = all_1_3_3
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_242_0_91, all_287_0_126 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_287_0_126, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_242_0_91, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (575) all_287_0_126 = all_242_0_91
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5, all_237_1_89, all_297_1_135 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_297_1_135, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_237_1_89, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (576) all_297_1_135 = all_237_1_89
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_262_0_106, all_267_0_110 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_267_0_110, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_262_0_106, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (577) all_267_0_110 = all_262_0_106
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_257_1_103, all_267_0_110 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_267_0_110, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_257_1_103, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (578) all_267_0_110 = all_257_1_103
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_247_1_95, all_16_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_247_1_95, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (579) all_247_1_95 = all_16_1_11
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_247_1_95, all_257_1_103 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_257_1_103, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_247_1_95, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (580) all_257_1_103 = all_247_1_95
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_142_0_61, all_267_0_110 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_267_0_110, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_0_61, yields:
% 31.48/8.62  																																																									| (581) all_267_0_110 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2, all_142_1_62, all_247_1_95 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_247_1_95, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_142_1_62, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (582) all_247_1_95 = all_142_1_62
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_302_0_138, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_302_0_138, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (583) all_302_0_138 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_292_1_131, all_302_0_138 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_302_0_138, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_292_1_131, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (584) all_302_0_138 = all_292_1_131
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_272_1_115, all_277_0_118 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_277_0_118, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_272_1_115, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (585) all_277_0_118 = all_272_1_115
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_267_1_111, all_272_1_115 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_272_1_115, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_267_1_111, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (586) all_272_1_115 = all_267_1_111
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_262_1_107, all_267_1_111 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_267_1_111, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_262_1_107, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (587) all_267_1_111 = all_262_1_107
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_257_0_102, all_262_1_107 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_262_1_107, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_257_0_102, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (588) all_262_1_107 = all_257_0_102
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_252_0_98, all_282_1_123 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_282_1_123, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_252_0_98, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (589) all_282_1_123 = all_252_0_98
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_252_0_98, all_257_0_102 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_257_0_102, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_252_0_98, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (590) all_257_0_102 = all_252_0_98
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_247_0_94, all_282_1_123 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_282_1_123, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_247_0_94, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (591) all_282_1_123 = all_247_0_94
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_232_1_85, all_282_1_123 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_282_1_123, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_232_1_85, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (592) all_282_1_123 = all_232_1_85
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_227_0_80, all_292_1_131 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_292_1_131, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_227_0_80, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (593) all_292_1_131 = all_227_0_80
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_227_0_80, all_232_1_85 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_232_1_85, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_227_0_80, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (594) all_232_1_85 = all_227_0_80
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_222_1_77, all_277_0_118 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_277_0_118, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_77, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (595) all_277_0_118 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5, all_217_0_72, all_227_0_80 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_227_0_80, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_217_0_72, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (596) all_227_0_80 = all_217_0_72
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_262_2_108, all_282_2_124 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_282_2_124, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_262_2_108, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (597) all_282_2_124 = all_262_2_108
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_252_2_100, all_262_2_108 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_262_2_108, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_252_2_100, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (598) all_262_2_108 = all_252_2_100
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_247_2_96, all_252_2_100 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_252_2_100, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_247_2_96, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (599) all_252_2_100 = all_247_2_96
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_242_2_93, all_282_2_124 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_282_2_124, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_242_2_93, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (600) all_282_2_124 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_227_2_82, all_247_2_96 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_247_2_96, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_227_2_82, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (601) all_247_2_96 = all_227_2_82
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_222_2_78, all_247_2_96 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_247_2_96, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (602) all_247_2_96 = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7, 0, all_152_2_70 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_2_70, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (603) all_152_2_70 = 0
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9, all_227_3_83, all_277_3_121 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_277_3_121, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_227_3_83, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (604) all_277_3_121 = all_227_3_83
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9, all_127_2_54, all_277_3_121 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_277_3_121, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_127_2_54, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (605) all_277_3_121 = all_127_2_54
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9, all_100_0_43, all_227_3_83 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_227_3_83, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_100_0_43, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (606) all_227_3_83 = all_100_0_43
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9, all_98_0_40, all_277_3_121 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_277_3_121, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_98_0_40, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (607) all_277_3_121 = all_98_0_40
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9, 0, all_227_3_83 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = all_227_3_83, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (608) all_227_3_83 = 0
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7, all_272_3_117, all_292_3_133 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_292_3_133, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_272_3_117, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (609) all_292_3_133 = all_272_3_117
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7, all_222_3_79, all_292_3_133 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_292_3_133, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_222_3_79, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (610) all_292_3_133 = all_222_3_79
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_282_3_125, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_282_3_125, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (611) all_282_3_125 = 0
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_232_3_87, all_282_3_125 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_282_3_125, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_232_3_87, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (612) all_282_3_125 = all_232_3_87
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_98_2_42, all_282_3_125 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_282_3_125, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_98_2_42, yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (613) all_282_3_125 = all_98_2_42
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Combining equations (584,583) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (614) all_292_1_131 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Simplifying 614 yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (615) all_292_1_131 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Combining equations (565,566) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (616) all_297_0_134 = all_292_0_130
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Simplifying 616 yields:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (617) all_297_0_134 = all_292_0_130
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| Combining equations (564,617) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.62  																																																									| (618) all_292_0_130 = all_18_1_14
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (567,617) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (619) all_292_0_130 = all_287_1_127
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (573,576) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (620) all_287_0_126 = all_237_1_89
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 620 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (621) all_287_0_126 = all_237_1_89
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (619,618) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (622) all_287_1_127 = all_18_1_14
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 622 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (623) all_287_1_127 = all_18_1_14
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (593,615) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (624) all_227_0_80 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 624 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (625) all_227_0_80 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (610,609) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (626) all_272_3_117 = all_222_3_79
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (575,621) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (627) all_242_0_91 = all_237_1_89
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 627 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (628) all_242_0_91 = all_237_1_89
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (571,569) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (629) all_277_1_119 = all_237_0_88
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (570,569) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (630) all_277_1_119 = all_242_1_92
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (589,591) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (631) all_252_0_98 = all_247_0_94
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 631 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (632) all_252_0_98 = all_247_0_94
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (592,591) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (633) all_247_0_94 = all_232_1_85
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (597,600) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (634) all_262_2_108 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 634 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (635) all_262_2_108 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (611,612) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (636) all_232_3_87 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (613,612) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (637) all_232_3_87 = all_98_2_42
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (585,595) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (638) all_272_1_115 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 638 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (639) all_272_1_115 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (630,629) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (640) all_242_1_92 = all_237_0_88
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 640 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (641) all_242_1_92 = all_237_0_88
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (604,605) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (642) all_227_3_83 = all_127_2_54
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 642 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (643) all_227_3_83 = all_127_2_54
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (607,605) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (644) all_127_2_54 = all_98_0_40
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (561,562) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (645) all_252_1_99 = all_222_0_76
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 645 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (646) all_252_1_99 = all_222_0_76
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (586,639) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (647) all_267_1_111 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 647 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (648) all_267_1_111 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (581,577) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (649) all_262_0_106 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (578,577) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (650) all_262_0_106 = all_257_1_103
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (587,648) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (651) all_262_1_107 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 651 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (652) all_262_1_107 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (650,649) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (653) all_257_1_103 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 653 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (654) all_257_1_103 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (588,652) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (655) all_257_0_102 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 655 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (656) all_257_0_102 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (598,635) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (657) all_252_2_100 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 657 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (658) all_252_2_100 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (590,656) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (659) all_252_0_98 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 659 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (660) all_252_0_98 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (580,654) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (661) all_247_1_95 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 661 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (662) all_247_1_95 = all_142_0_61
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (632,660) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (663) all_247_0_94 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 663 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (664) all_247_0_94 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (563,646) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (665) all_222_0_76 = all_217_1_73
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (560,646) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (666) all_222_0_76 = all_1_1_1
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (599,658) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (667) all_247_2_96 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 667 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (668) all_247_2_96 = all_242_2_93
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (633,664) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (669) all_232_1_85 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 669 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (670) all_232_1_85 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (582,662) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (671) all_142_0_61 = all_142_1_62
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (579,662) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (672) all_142_0_61 = all_16_1_11
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (602,668) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (673) all_242_2_93 = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (601,668) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (674) all_242_2_93 = all_227_2_82
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (628,574) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (675) all_237_1_89 = all_1_3_3
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 675 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (676) all_237_1_89 = all_1_3_3
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (641,572) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (677) all_237_0_88 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 677 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (678) all_237_0_88 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (674,673) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (679) all_227_2_82 = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 679 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (680) all_227_2_82 = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (594,670) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (681) all_227_0_80 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 681 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (682) all_227_0_80 = all_222_1_77
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (636,637) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (683) all_98_2_42 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (596,682) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (684) all_222_1_77 = all_217_0_72
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (625,682) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (685) all_222_1_77 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (608,606) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (686) all_100_0_43 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (643,606) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (687) all_127_2_54 = all_100_0_43
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 687 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (688) all_127_2_54 = all_100_0_43
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (666,665) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (689) all_217_1_73 = all_1_1_1
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (684,685) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (690) all_217_0_72 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 690 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (691) all_217_0_72 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (672,671) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (692) all_142_1_62 = all_16_1_11
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (688,644) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (693) all_100_0_43 = all_98_0_40
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Simplifying 693 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (694) all_100_0_43 = all_98_0_40
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (686,694) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (695) all_98_0_40 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (695,644) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (696) all_127_2_54 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (683,637) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (636) all_232_3_87 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (685,664) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (698) all_247_0_94 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (678,629) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (699) all_277_1_119 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (636,612) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (611) all_282_3_125 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (673,600) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (701) all_282_2_124 = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (698,591) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (702) all_282_1_123 = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| Combining equations (699,569) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (703) all_282_0_122 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (689) and (388) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (52) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (623) and (526) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (558) and (253) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (706) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_44
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (676) and (426) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (56) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (692) and (290) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (691) and (387) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (57) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (680) and (406) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (395) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (603) and (306) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (256) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (695) and (248) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (261) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (626) and (493) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (397) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_222_3_79
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| From (683) and (249) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (54) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (568), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (715)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_44)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| Using (706) and (715) yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (706) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_44
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									| (718) all_277_1_119 = all_100_1_44
% 31.51/8.63  																																																									|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| Combining equations (718,699) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (719) all_100_1_44 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| Simplifying 719 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (720) all_100_1_44 = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| Equations (720) can reduce 262 to:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (721)  ~ (all_98_1_41 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| From (720) and (706) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (247) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (408), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										| (723)  ~ (all_227_2_82 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											| Equations (680) can reduce 723 to:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											| (724)  ~ (all_222_2_78 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (307), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																												| (726)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																													| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														| Using (52) and (726) yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														| (728)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (49), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														| (729) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															| From (729) and (48) follows:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															| (730) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (61), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															| (731)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| Using (730) and (731) yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															| (730) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															| (734)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 31.51/8.63  																																																															|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| Instantiating (734) with all_348_0_142, all_348_1_143, all_348_2_144 yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (735) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = all_348_0_142 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = all_348_1_143 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_348_2_144 & ( ~ (all_348_2_144 = 0) | (all_348_0_142 = 0 & all_348_1_143 = 0))
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (735) yields:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (736) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = all_348_0_142
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (737) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = all_348_1_143
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (738) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_348_2_144
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (739)  ~ (all_348_2_144 = 0) | (all_348_0_142 = 0 & all_348_1_143 = 0)
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																|
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.63  																																																																| (731)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	| Using (730) and (731) yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																| (730) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																| (743) all_16_1_11 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (743), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	| (744) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9, all_348_1_143, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = all_348_1_143, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (745) all_348_1_143 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8, all_348_2_144, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = all_348_2_144, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (746) all_348_2_144 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| From (745) and (737) follows:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (744) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (739), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (748)  ~ (all_348_2_144 = 0)
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Equations (746) can reduce 748 to:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (746) all_348_2_144 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		| (751) all_348_0_142 = 0 & all_348_1_143 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (751) yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (752) all_348_0_142 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (745) all_348_1_143 = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| From (752) and (736) follows:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (754) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = 0
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_18_1_14, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (755) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_152_0_68, all_1_3_3, all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (756) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_152_0_68, all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69, all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (757) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_152_0_68, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69, all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (758) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (759) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_152_0_68, all_16_1_11, all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (760) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_152_0_68, all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (761) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_152_0_68, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (762) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_16_1_11, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (763) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_152_0_68, all_1_4_4, all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (764) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (765) all_152_0_68 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_152_0_68, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69, all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (766) all_152_0_68 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_1_1_1, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (767) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_1_1, all_127_0_52, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (768) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (769) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_1_1, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (770) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_18_1_14, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (771) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_18_1_14, all_127_0_52, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (772) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_18_1_14, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (773) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_18_1_14, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (774) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_1_3_3, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (775) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_3_3, all_127_0_52, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			| (776) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.64  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (777) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = all_1_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (778) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_16_1_11, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (779) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_16_1_11, all_127_0_52, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (780) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_16_1_11, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (781) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_16_1_11, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (782) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_1_4_4, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (783) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_4_4, all_127_0_52, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (784) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (785) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (786) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_52, all_98_1_41, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (787) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_98_1_41, all_127_0_52, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (788) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_127_0_52, all_98_1_41, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (789) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_98_1_41, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = all_98_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (790) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (25) with all_222_2_78, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = 0, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (791) all_222_2_78 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (30) with 0, all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (792)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (793)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (36) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (794)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (45) with 0, all_152_1_69, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_152_1_69, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (795)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_152_0_68, all_152_0_68, all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69, all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = all_152_0_68, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (796) all_152_0_68 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (797)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (798)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_16_1_11, all_127_0_52, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (799) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_1_4_4, all_127_0_52, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (800) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_127_0_52, all_1_4_4, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (801) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_127_0_52, all_127_0_52, all_127_1_53, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (802) all_127_0_52 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (30) with all_297_3_137, all_1_8_8, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = all_297_3_137, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (803)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_297_3_137 = 0)))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_16_1_11, all_127_0_52, all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (804) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_1_4_4, all_127_0_52, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| (805) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.65  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_127_0_52, all_16_1_11, all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_11, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (806) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_127_0_52, all_1_4_4, all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5, all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = all_127_0_52, apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = all_1_4_4, distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (807) all_127_0_52 = 0 | all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating formula (30) with all_222_3_79, all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = all_222_3_79, yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (808)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_222_3_79 = 0)))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (793) with all_385_0_160, all_385_1_161, all_385_2_162 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (809) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_385_2_162 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_385_2_162) = all_385_1_161 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_385_0_160 & ( ~ (all_385_1_161 = 0) | all_385_0_160 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (809) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (810) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_385_2_162
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (811) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_385_2_162) = all_385_1_161
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (812) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (813)  ~ (all_385_1_161 = 0) | all_385_0_160 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (792) with all_387_0_163, all_387_1_164, all_387_2_165 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (814) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_387_2_165 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_387_2_165) = all_387_1_164 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_387_0_163 & ( ~ (all_387_1_164 = 0) | all_387_0_163 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (814) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (815) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_387_2_165
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (816) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_387_2_165) = all_387_1_164
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (817) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_387_0_163
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (818)  ~ (all_387_1_164 = 0) | all_387_0_163 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (808) with all_395_0_175, all_395_1_176, all_395_2_177 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (819) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_395_2_177 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_395_2_177) = all_395_1_176 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6) = all_395_0_175 & ( ~ (all_395_1_176 = 0) | (all_395_0_175 = 0 & all_222_3_79 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (819) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (820) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_395_2_177
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (821) apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_395_2_177) = all_395_1_176
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (822) distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_6_6) = all_395_0_175
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (823)  ~ (all_395_1_176 = 0) | (all_395_0_175 = 0 & all_222_3_79 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (803) with all_429_0_226, all_429_1_227, all_429_2_228 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (824) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_429_2_228 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_429_2_228) = all_429_1_227 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_6_6) = all_429_0_226 & ( ~ (all_429_1_227 = 0) | (all_429_0_226 = 0 & all_297_3_137 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (824) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (825) line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_429_2_228
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (826) apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_429_2_228) = all_429_1_227
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (827) distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_6_6) = all_429_0_226
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (828)  ~ (all_429_1_227 = 0) | (all_429_0_226 = 0 & all_297_3_137 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (798) with all_441_0_244, all_441_1_245, all_441_2_246 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (829) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = all_441_2_246 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_441_2_246) = all_441_1_245 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_441_0_244 & ( ~ (all_441_1_245 = 0) | all_441_0_244 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (829) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (830) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = all_441_2_246
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (831) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_441_2_246) = all_441_1_245
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (832) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_441_0_244
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (833)  ~ (all_441_1_245 = 0) | all_441_0_244 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (797) with all_445_0_250, all_445_1_251, all_445_2_252 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (834) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = all_445_2_252 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_445_2_252) = all_445_1_251 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_445_0_250 & ( ~ (all_445_1_251 = 0) | all_445_0_250 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (834) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (835) line_connecting(all_1_6_6, all_1_8_8) = all_445_2_252
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (836) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_445_2_252) = all_445_1_251
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (837) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_445_0_250
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (838)  ~ (all_445_1_251 = 0) | all_445_0_250 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (795) with all_463_0_277, all_463_1_278, all_463_2_279 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (839) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = all_463_1_278 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_463_0_277 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_463_2_279 & ( ~ (all_463_1_278 = 0) |  ~ (all_463_2_279 = 0) | all_463_0_277 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (839) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (840) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = all_463_1_278
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (841) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_463_0_277
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (842) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = all_463_2_279
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (843)  ~ (all_463_1_278 = 0) |  ~ (all_463_2_279 = 0) | all_463_0_277 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Instantiating (794) with all_465_0_280, all_465_1_281, all_465_2_282 yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (844) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_465_1_281 & distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_465_2_282 & ( ~ (all_465_1_281 = 0) |  ~ (all_465_2_282 = 0) | all_465_0_280 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (844) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (845) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_465_1_281
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (846) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (847) distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_465_2_282
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (848)  ~ (all_465_1_281 = 0) |  ~ (all_465_2_282 = 0) | all_465_0_280 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (791), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			| (849) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (559), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				| (850)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| From (729) and (850) follows:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (851)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| Using (849) and (851) yields:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				| (853) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				| (854) all_132_1_56 = all_1_0_0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| From (729) and (853) follows:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (849) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (796), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					| (859)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (766), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						| (863)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (802), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							| (867)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (801), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								| (871) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (755), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									| (875) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_152_1_69) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (756), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										| (879) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (757), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											| (883) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (758), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																													| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																													| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.66  																																																																												| (887) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (806), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													| (891) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (804), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														| (895) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (779), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															| (899) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (780), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																| (903) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (761), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	| (907) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (759), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		| (911) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (760), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			| (915) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (762), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				| (919) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_152_1_69, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (807), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					| (923) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (781), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						| (927) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (765), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							| (931) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (763), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								| (935) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (764), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										| Equations (856) can reduce 725 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									| (725)  ~ (all_152_0_68 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									| (939) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (782), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										| (943) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (805), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											| (947) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (783), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												| (951) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (784), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													| (955) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (785), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														| (959) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (786), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															| (963) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (789), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																| (967) all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (787), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	| (971) all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (788), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		| (975) all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (790), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.67  																																																																																																			| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																			| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																			| (979) all_98_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (771), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				| (983) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (772), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					| (987) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (773), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						| (991) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (774), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							| (995) all_18_1_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (777), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								| (999) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (769), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									| (1003) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (767), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										| (1007) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_7_7, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (768), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											| (1011) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (770), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												| (1015) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																												|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (775), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													| (1019) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																													|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (776), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														| (1023) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																														|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (778), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															| (1027) all_1_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_8_8) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																															|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (799), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																| (1031) all_16_1_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (800), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		| Equations (864) can reduce 727 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	| (727)  ~ (all_127_0_52 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	| (1035) all_1_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (939), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		| (1039)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_152_1_69) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_152_1_69) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (947), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			| (1043)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_8_8, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (951), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				| (1047)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (955), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					| (1051)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																					|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (959), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						| (1055)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																						|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (963), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							| (1059)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_127_1_53) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_9_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_127_1_53) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_9_9, all_1_9_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																							|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1035), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								| (53)  ~ (all_1_4_4 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								| (1063)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																								|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating (1063) with all_754_0_340, all_754_1_341, all_754_2_342 yields:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1064) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = all_754_1_341 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_754_0_340 & distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = all_754_2_342 & ( ~ (all_754_2_342 = 0) | all_754_0_340 = 0 | all_754_1_341 = 0)
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1064) yields:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1065) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_127_1_53) = all_754_1_341
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1066) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_754_0_340
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1067) distinct_lines(all_127_1_53, all_1_5_5) = all_754_2_342
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1068)  ~ (all_754_2_342 = 0) | all_754_0_340 = 0 | all_754_1_341 = 0
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_429_2_228, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_429_2_228, line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_1_5_5, yields:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1069) all_429_2_228 = all_1_5_5
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_395_2_177, all_429_2_228 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_429_2_228, line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_395_2_177, yields:
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| (1070) all_429_2_228 = all_395_2_177
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.68  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6, all_387_2_165, all_429_2_228 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_429_2_228, line_connecting(all_1_7_7, all_1_6_6) = all_387_2_165, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1071) all_429_2_228 = all_387_2_165
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5, all_754_0_340, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_754_0_340, apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1072) all_754_0_340 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5, all_754_0_340, all_387_1_164 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_754_0_340, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1073) all_754_0_340 = all_387_1_164 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_387_1_164)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5, all_465_1_281, all_754_0_340 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_754_0_340, apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_465_1_281, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1074) all_754_0_340 = all_465_1_281
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_6_6 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1075)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_463_0_277, all_465_0_280 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_463_0_277, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1076) all_465_0_280 = all_463_0_277
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_445_0_250, all_465_0_280 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_445_0_250, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1077) all_465_0_280 = all_445_0_250
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_441_0_244, all_463_0_277 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_463_0_277, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_441_0_244, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1078) all_463_0_277 = all_441_0_244
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_387_0_163, all_465_0_280 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_387_0_163, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1079) all_465_0_280 = all_387_0_163
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6, all_385_0_160, all_465_0_280 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_465_0_280, distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_385_0_160, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1080) all_465_0_280 = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1072,1074) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1081) all_465_1_281 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1080,1077) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1082) all_445_0_250 = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1076,1077) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1083) all_463_0_277 = all_445_0_250
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Simplifying 1083 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1084) all_463_0_277 = all_445_0_250
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1079,1077) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1085) all_445_0_250 = all_387_0_163
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1084,1078) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1086) all_445_0_250 = all_441_0_244
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Simplifying 1086 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1087) all_445_0_250 = all_441_0_244
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1085,1087) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1088) all_441_0_244 = all_387_0_163
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1082,1087) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1089) all_441_0_244 = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1088,1089) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1090) all_387_0_163 = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Simplifying 1090 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1091) all_387_0_163 = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1069,1070) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1092) all_395_2_177 = all_1_5_5
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1071,1070) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1093) all_395_2_177 = all_387_2_165
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1092,1093) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1094) all_387_2_165 = all_1_5_5
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| Combining equations (1081,1074) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1072) all_754_0_340 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| From (1094) and (816) follows:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1096) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_387_1_164
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| From (1091) and (817) follows:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (812) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = all_385_0_160
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1073), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1098)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_387_1_164)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| Using (1096) and (1098) yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1096) apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = all_387_1_164
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									| (1101) all_754_0_340 = all_387_1_164
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																									|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| Combining equations (1072,1101) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| (1102) all_387_1_164 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (818), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| (1103)  ~ (all_387_1_164 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| Equations (1102) can reduce 1103 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| (1102) all_387_1_164 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										| (1106) all_387_0_163 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																										|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| Combining equations (1091,1106) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| (1107) all_385_0_160 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| Simplifying 1107 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| (1108) all_385_0_160 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| From (1108) and (812) follows:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| (1109) distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_6_6) = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| Using (1109) and (1075) yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											| (203) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																			| (851)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_6_6, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																			| (1112) all_222_2_78 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																			|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																				| Equations (1112) can reduce 724 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																				| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																				|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																	| (1114)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_9_9) = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																	| (281) all_16_1_11 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																	|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																		| Equations (281) can reduce 206 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																		| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																		|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (1117)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (1118) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																															| Equations (1118) can reduce 728 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																															| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																															|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (864) all_127_0_52 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1121)  ~ (all_127_2_54 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Equations (696) can reduce 1121 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (1123) apart_point_and_line(all_1_7_7, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (1124) all_18_1_14 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1124), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1125) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Instantiating formula (6) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, 0, all_222_2_78 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_78, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (1112) all_222_2_78 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Equations (1112) can reduce 724 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1128)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (272) all_18_1_14 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Equations (272) can reduce 212 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (856) all_152_0_68 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1132)  ~ (all_152_2_70 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| Equations (603) can reduce 1132 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																										| (1134) all_227_2_82 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																										| (1135)  ~ (all_227_3_83 = 0) | all_227_0_80 = 0 | all_227_1_81 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																										|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| Combining equations (1134,680) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1112) all_222_2_78 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| Combining equations (1112,701) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1137) all_282_2_124 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1138)  ~ (all_282_2_124 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| Equations (1137) can reduce 1138 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1137) all_282_2_124 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											| (1141)  ~ (all_282_3_125 = 0) | all_282_0_122 = 0 | all_282_1_123 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																											|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1141), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (1142)  ~ (all_282_3_125 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| Equations (611) can reduce 1142 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (611) all_282_3_125 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												| (1145) all_282_0_122 = 0 | all_282_1_123 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																												|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1145), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1146) all_282_0_122 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Combining equations (703,1146) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (1147) all_98_1_41 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Simplifying 1147 yields:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (1148) all_98_1_41 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Equations (1148) can reduce 721 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1150)  ~ (all_282_0_122 = 0)
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													| (1151) all_282_1_123 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																													|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Combining equations (1151,702) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (102) all_1_4_4 = 0
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| Equations (102) can reduce 53 to:
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|
% 31.51/8.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  														|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  														| (1154) all_100_1_44 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  														| (1155) all_100_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_25 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  														|
% 31.51/8.70  															| Applying alpha-rule on (1155) yields:
% 31.51/8.70  															| (686) all_100_0_43 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  															| (1157) all_28_3_25 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  															|
% 31.51/8.70  															| Equations (1157) can reduce 214 to:
% 31.51/8.70  															| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  															|
% 31.51/8.70  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  													|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  													| (1159)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_8_8, all_1_9_9) = 0)
% 31.51/8.70  													| (257) all_16_0_10 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  													|
% 31.51/8.70  														| Equations (257) can reduce 189 to:
% 31.51/8.70  														| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  														|
% 31.51/8.70  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  											|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  											| (1162)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_6_6, all_1_7_7) = 0)
% 31.51/8.70  											| (295) all_18_0_13 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  											|
% 31.51/8.70  												| Equations (295) can reduce 188 to:
% 31.51/8.70  												| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  												|
% 31.51/8.70  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  								|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  								| (1165) all_22_1_20 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  								| (1166)  ~ (all_22_2_21 = 0) | all_22_0_19 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  								|
% 31.51/8.70  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1166), into two cases.
% 31.51/8.70  									|-Branch one:
% 31.51/8.70  									| (1167)  ~ (all_22_2_21 = 0)
% 31.51/8.70  									|
% 31.51/8.70  										| Equations (162) can reduce 1167 to:
% 31.51/8.70  										| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  										|
% 31.51/8.70  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  									|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  									| (162) all_22_2_21 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  									| (1170) all_22_0_19 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  									|
% 31.51/8.70  										| Combining equations (164,1170) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.70  										| (1171) all_18_0_13 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  										|
% 31.51/8.70  										| Simplifying 1171 yields:
% 31.51/8.70  										| (295) all_18_0_13 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  										|
% 31.51/8.70  										| Equations (295) can reduce 188 to:
% 31.51/8.70  										| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  										|
% 31.51/8.70  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  							|-Branch two:
% 31.51/8.70  							| (1174) all_20_1_17 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  							| (1175) all_20_0_16 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  							|
% 31.51/8.70  								| Combining equations (1175,185) yields a new equation:
% 31.51/8.70  								| (257) all_16_0_10 = 0
% 31.51/8.70  								|
% 31.51/8.70  								| Equations (257) can reduce 189 to:
% 31.51/8.70  								| (93) $false
% 31.51/8.70  								|
% 31.51/8.70  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.51/8.70  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 31.51/8.70  
% 31.51/8.70  8099ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------