TSTP Solution File: GEO187+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.11s 1.87s
% Output   : Proof 19.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:44:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.50/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.50/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.50/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.50/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.50/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.50/0.60  
% 0.50/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.50/0.60  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.50/0.60  
% 0.50/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.50/0.60  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.50/0.60  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.50/0.60  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.50/0.60  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.50/0.60  
% 0.50/0.60  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.50/0.60  
% 0.50/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.71/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.66/0.95  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.00/1.09  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.00/1.11  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.87/1.34  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.87/1.34  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.99/1.37  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.27/1.46  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.39/1.52  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.39/1.52  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.61/1.54  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.09/1.66  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.09/1.66  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.11/1.86  Prover 2: proved (347ms)
% 5.11/1.87  
% 5.11/1.87  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 5.11/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.11/1.87  
% 5.11/1.87  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 18.56/5.06  found it (size 840)
% 18.56/5.06  
% 18.56/5.06  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 18.56/5.06  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 18.56/5.06  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v3) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v10) = 0) &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : intersection_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : line_connecting(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_points(v11, v10) = v12 & ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v7) = 0) | (v8 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v7) = 0)))
% 18.88/5.12  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 yields:
% 18.88/5.12  | (1)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5 & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2 & ((all_0_0_0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0))
% 18.88/5.15  |
% 18.88/5.15  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 18.88/5.15  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 18.88/5.15  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 18.88/5.15  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 18.88/5.15  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 18.88/5.15  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.15  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.15  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 19.07/5.15  | (9) (all_0_0_0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 19.07/5.15  | (11)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.15  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 19.07/5.15  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (14) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5
% 19.07/5.15  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.15  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (19)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.15  | (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.15  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.15  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 19.07/5.15  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.16  | (26) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2
% 19.07/5.16  | (27) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3
% 19.07/5.16  | (28) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 19.07/5.16  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.16  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.16  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.16  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 19.07/5.16  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.16  | (41)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.16  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.16  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 19.07/5.16  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 19.07/5.16  | (47)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.16  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.16  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.17  | (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.07/5.17  | (51)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.17  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 19.07/5.17  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 19.07/5.17  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 19.07/5.17  | (55) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 19.07/5.17  | (56) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4
% 19.07/5.17  | (57)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 19.07/5.17  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (59)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (60)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (61)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (62)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (63) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (64) all_0_3_3 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (65) all_0_3_3 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (66) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (67)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, v0) = v1)
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (53) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.17  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, v0) = v1)
% 19.07/5.17  |
% 19.07/5.17  | Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (69) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating formula (54) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (70) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating formula (46) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (71)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, v0) = v1)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating formula (53) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (72)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, v0) = v1)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (72) with all_20_0_28, all_20_1_29 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (73)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_20_1_29) = all_20_0_28
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (73) yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  | (75) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29
% 19.07/5.18  | (76) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_20_1_29) = all_20_0_28
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (71) with all_22_0_30, all_22_1_31 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (77)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_1_31 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_22_1_31) = all_22_0_30
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  | (79) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_1_31
% 19.07/5.18  | (80) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_22_1_31) = all_22_0_30
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (62) with all_24_0_32 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (81) ( ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_24_0_32) | ( ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_24_0_32)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (68) with all_25_0_33, all_25_1_34 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (82)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_1_34 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_25_1_34) = all_25_0_33
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (82) yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  | (84) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_1_34
% 19.07/5.18  | (85) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_25_1_34) = all_25_0_33
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (67) with all_27_0_35, all_27_1_36 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (86)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_27_1_36 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_27_1_36) = all_27_0_35
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (86) yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  | (88) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_27_1_36
% 19.07/5.18  | (89) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_27_1_36) = all_27_0_35
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (61) with all_29_0_37 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (90) ( ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_29_0_37) | ( ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_29_0_37)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (59) with all_30_0_38 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (91) ( ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_30_0_38) | ( ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_0_38)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  | Instantiating (60) with all_31_0_39 yields:
% 19.07/5.18  | (92) ( ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_31_0_39) | ( ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_31_0_39)
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (91), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.18  |-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.18  | (93)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_30_0_38
% 19.07/5.18  |
% 19.07/5.18  	| Applying alpha-rule on (93) yields:
% 19.07/5.18  	| (94)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  	| (95) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_30_0_38
% 19.07/5.18  	|
% 19.07/5.18  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (69), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.18  	|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.18  	| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.07/5.18  	|
% 19.07/5.18  		| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.07/5.18  		| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.18  		|
% 19.07/5.18  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.18  	|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.18  	| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  	| (99)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.18  	|
% 19.07/5.18  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (70), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.18  		|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.18  		| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.07/5.18  		|
% 19.07/5.18  			| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.07/5.18  			| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.18  			|
% 19.07/5.18  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.18  		|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.18  		| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  		| (103)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.18  		|
% 19.07/5.18  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.18  			|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.18  			| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.07/5.18  			|
% 19.07/5.18  				| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.07/5.18  				| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.18  				|
% 19.07/5.18  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.18  			|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.18  			| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.07/5.18  			| (107)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.18  			|
% 19.07/5.18  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.18  				|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.18  				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.07/5.19  				|
% 19.07/5.19  					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.07/5.19  					| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.19  					|
% 19.07/5.19  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.19  				|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.19  				| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  				| (111) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.19  				|
% 19.07/5.19  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (64), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  					|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  					| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.07/5.19  					|
% 19.07/5.19  						| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.07/5.19  						| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.19  						|
% 19.07/5.19  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.19  					|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.19  					| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  					| (115) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.19  					|
% 19.07/5.19  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (90), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  						|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  						| (116)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_29_0_37
% 19.07/5.19  						|
% 19.07/5.19  							| Applying alpha-rule on (116) yields:
% 19.07/5.19  							| (117)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  							| (118) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_29_0_37
% 19.07/5.19  							|
% 19.07/5.19  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (81), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  							|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  							| (119)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_24_0_32
% 19.07/5.19  							|
% 19.07/5.19  								| Applying alpha-rule on (119) yields:
% 19.07/5.19  								| (120)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  								| (121) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_24_0_32
% 19.07/5.19  								|
% 19.07/5.19  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  								|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  								| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.07/5.19  								|
% 19.07/5.19  									| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.07/5.19  									| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.19  									|
% 19.07/5.19  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.19  								|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.19  								| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  								| (125)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.19  								|
% 19.07/5.19  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (115), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  									|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  									| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.07/5.19  									|
% 19.07/5.19  										| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.07/5.19  										| (97) $false
% 19.07/5.19  										|
% 19.07/5.19  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.07/5.19  									|-Branch two:
% 19.07/5.19  									| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  									| (129)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.19  									|
% 19.07/5.19  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (92), into two cases.
% 19.07/5.19  										|-Branch one:
% 19.07/5.19  										| (130)  ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_31_0_39
% 19.07/5.19  										|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (130) yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (131)  ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0)
% 19.07/5.19  											| (132) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_31_0_39
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_27_1_36, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_27_1_36, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (133) all_27_1_36 = all_0_5_5
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_25_1_34, all_27_1_36 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_27_1_36, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_25_1_34, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (134) all_27_1_36 = all_25_1_34
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_22_1_31, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_1_31, line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (135) all_22_1_31 = all_0_2_2
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_20_1_29, all_22_1_31 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_22_1_31, line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_20_1_29, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (136) all_22_1_31 = all_20_1_29
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Combining equations (133,134) yields a new equation:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (137) all_25_1_34 = all_0_5_5
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Combining equations (136,135) yields a new equation:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (138) all_20_1_29 = all_0_2_2
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Simplifying 138 yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (139) all_20_1_29 = all_0_2_2
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Combining equations (137,134) yields a new equation:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (133) all_27_1_36 = all_0_5_5
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| From (133) and (89) follows:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (141) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| From (137) and (85) follows:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (142) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| From (135) and (80) follows:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (143) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| From (139) and (76) follows:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (144) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_27_0_35, all_30_0_38 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_30_0_38, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (145) all_30_0_38 = all_27_0_35
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_25_0_33, all_31_0_39 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_31_0_39, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 19.07/5.19  											| (146) all_31_0_39 = all_25_0_33
% 19.07/5.19  											|
% 19.07/5.19  											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_22_0_30, all_29_0_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_29_0_37, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (147) all_29_0_37 = all_22_0_30
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_20_0_28, all_24_0_32 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_24_0_32, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (148) all_24_0_32 = all_20_0_28
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Equations (146) can reduce 131 to:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Equations (145) can reduce 94 to:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Equations (147) can reduce 117 to:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Equations (148) can reduce 120 to:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| From (145) and (95) follows:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (141) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| From (146) and (132) follows:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (142) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| From (147) and (118) follows:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (143) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| From (148) and (121) follows:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (144) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_27_0_35, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (157) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (158) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_27_0_35, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (159) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (160) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_27_0_35, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (161) all_27_0_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (162) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_25_0_33, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (163) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (164) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_25_0_33, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.20  											| (165) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.20  											|
% 19.07/5.20  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (166) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_25_0_33, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (167) all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (8) with all_22_0_30, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (168) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_3_3, all_22_0_30, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (169) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (170) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_22_0_30, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (171) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (172) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_22_0_30, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (173) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_22_0_30, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (174) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_4_4, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (175) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_27_0_35, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (176) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.21  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_27_0_35, all_22_0_30, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.21  											| (177) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.21  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_22_0_30, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (178) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_27_0_35, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (179) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_25_0_33, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (180) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_22_0_30, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (181) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_22_0_30, all_25_0_33, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (182) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_25_0_33, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (183) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (8) with all_22_0_30, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (184) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (185) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (186) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_20_0_28, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (187) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_20_0_28, all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (188) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_3_3, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.22  											| (189) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.07/5.22  											|
% 19.07/5.22  											| Instantiating formula (54) with all_20_0_28, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (190) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (54) with all_0_4_4, all_20_0_28, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (191) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (192) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_20_0_28, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (193) all_20_0_28 = 0 | all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_27_0_35, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (194) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_27_0_35, all_20_0_28, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (195) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_20_0_28, all_27_0_35, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (196) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_27_0_35, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (197) all_27_0_35 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_25_0_33, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (198) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_25_0_33, all_20_0_28, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (199) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_20_0_28, all_25_0_33, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (200) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.07/5.23  											|
% 19.07/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_25_0_33, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.07/5.23  											| (201) all_25_0_33 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.23  											|
% 19.48/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_22_0_30, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.48/5.23  											| (202) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.23  											|
% 19.48/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_22_0_30, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.48/5.23  											| (203) all_22_0_30 = 0 | all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.23  											|
% 19.48/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (54) with all_20_0_28, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.48/5.23  											| (204) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.23  											|
% 19.48/5.23  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_28, all_20_0_28, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, yields:
% 19.48/5.23  											| (205) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  											|
% 19.48/5.24  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (9), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  											| (206) all_0_0_0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.48/5.24  											|
% 19.48/5.24  												| Applying alpha-rule on (206) yields:
% 19.48/5.24  												| (207) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  												| (208) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.48/5.24  												|
% 19.48/5.24  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  												|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  												|
% 19.48/5.24  													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.24  													| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  													|
% 19.48/5.24  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  												|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  												| (212)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  												|
% 19.48/5.24  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  													|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  													|
% 19.48/5.24  														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.24  														| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  														|
% 19.48/5.24  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  													|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  													| (216)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  													|
% 19.48/5.24  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  														|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  														| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  														|
% 19.48/5.24  															| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.24  															| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  															|
% 19.48/5.24  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  														|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  														| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  														| (220)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  														|
% 19.48/5.24  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  															|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  															| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  															|
% 19.48/5.24  																| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																|
% 19.48/5.24  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  															|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  															| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  															| (224)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  															|
% 19.48/5.24  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																|
% 19.48/5.24  																	| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																	| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																	|
% 19.48/5.24  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																| (228)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																|
% 19.48/5.24  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																	|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																	| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																	|
% 19.48/5.24  																		| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																		| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																		|
% 19.48/5.24  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																	|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																	| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																	| (232)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																	|
% 19.48/5.24  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																		|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																		| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																		|
% 19.48/5.24  																			| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																			| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																			|
% 19.48/5.24  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																		|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																		| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																		| (236) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																		|
% 19.48/5.24  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																			|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																			| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																			|
% 19.48/5.24  																				| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																				| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																				|
% 19.48/5.24  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																			|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																			| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																			| (240) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																			|
% 19.48/5.24  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																				|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																				| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																				|
% 19.48/5.24  																					| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																					| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																					|
% 19.48/5.24  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																				|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																				| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																				| (244) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																				|
% 19.48/5.24  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																					|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																					| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																					|
% 19.48/5.24  																						| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																						| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																						|
% 19.48/5.24  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																					|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																					| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																					| (248) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																					|
% 19.48/5.24  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																						|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																						| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																						|
% 19.48/5.24  																							| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																							| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																							|
% 19.48/5.24  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																						|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																						| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																						| (252) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																						|
% 19.48/5.24  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																							|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																							| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																							|
% 19.48/5.24  																								| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																								| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																								|
% 19.48/5.24  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																							|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																							| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																							| (256) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																							|
% 19.48/5.24  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																								| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																								|
% 19.48/5.24  																									| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																									|
% 19.48/5.24  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																								| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																								| (260) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.24  																								|
% 19.48/5.24  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.24  																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.24  																									| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.24  																									|
% 19.48/5.24  																										| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.24  																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.24  																										|
% 19.48/5.24  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.24  																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.24  																									| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.24  																									| (264) all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																									|
% 19.48/5.25  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																										|
% 19.48/5.25  																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																											|
% 19.48/5.25  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																										| (268) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																										|
% 19.48/5.25  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																											|
% 19.48/5.25  																												| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																												| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																												|
% 19.48/5.25  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																											|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																											| (272) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																											|
% 19.48/5.25  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																												|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																												|
% 19.48/5.25  																													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																													| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																													|
% 19.48/5.25  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																												|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																												| (276) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																												|
% 19.48/5.25  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																													|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																													| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																													|
% 19.48/5.25  																														| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																														| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																														|
% 19.48/5.25  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																													|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																													| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																													| (280) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																													|
% 19.48/5.25  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																														|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																														| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																														|
% 19.48/5.25  																															| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																															| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																															|
% 19.48/5.25  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																														|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																														| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																														| (284) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																														|
% 19.48/5.25  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																															|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																															| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																															|
% 19.48/5.25  																																| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																|
% 19.48/5.25  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																															|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																															| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																															| (288) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																															|
% 19.48/5.25  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																|
% 19.48/5.25  																																	| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																	| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																| (292) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																|
% 19.48/5.25  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																	| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|
% 19.48/5.25  																																		| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																		| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																	| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																	| (296) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																	|
% 19.48/5.25  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																		| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|
% 19.48/5.25  																																			| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																			| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																		| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																		| (300) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																		|
% 19.48/5.25  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																			| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|
% 19.48/5.25  																																				| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																				| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																			| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																			| (304) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																			|
% 19.48/5.25  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																				| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|
% 19.48/5.25  																																					| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																					| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																				| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																				| (308) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																				|
% 19.48/5.25  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																					| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|
% 19.48/5.25  																																						| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																						| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																					| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																					| (312) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																					|
% 19.48/5.25  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																						| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|
% 19.48/5.25  																																							| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																							| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																						| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																						| (316) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																						|
% 19.48/5.25  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																							| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|
% 19.48/5.25  																																								| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																								| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																							| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																							| (320) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																							|
% 19.48/5.25  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																								| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|
% 19.48/5.25  																																									| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																								| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																								| (324) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																								|
% 19.48/5.25  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																									| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|
% 19.48/5.25  																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																										|
% 19.48/5.25  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																									| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																									| (328) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.25  																																									|
% 19.48/5.25  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.25  																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.25  																																										| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.25  																																										|
% 19.48/5.25  																																											| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.25  																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.25  																																											|
% 19.48/5.25  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.25  																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.25  																																										| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.25  																																										| (332) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																										|
% 19.48/5.26  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																											|
% 19.48/5.26  																																												| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																												| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																											| (336) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																											|
% 19.48/5.26  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																												| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																													| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																													| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																												| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																												| (340) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																														| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																													| (344) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																														| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|
% 19.48/5.26  																																															| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																															| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																														| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																														| (348) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																														|
% 19.48/5.26  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																															| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																															| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																															| (352) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																															|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																| (356) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	| (360) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																	|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		| (364) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																		|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			| (368) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																			|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				| (372) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																				|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					| (376) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																					|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						| (380) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																						|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							| (384) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																							|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								| (388) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																								|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									| (392) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																									|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										| (396) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																										|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											| (400) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																											|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												| (404) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																												|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													| (408)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.26  																																																													|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																															| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.26  																																																															|
% 19.48/5.26  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.26  																																																														| (412)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																														|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															| Instantiating (412) with all_262_0_208 yields:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															| (413) (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208) | ( ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_208)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (348), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															| (417)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (380), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																| (421)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	| (425)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (400), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		| (429)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			| (433)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				| (437)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					| (441)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																					|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						| (445)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																						|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							| (449)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																							|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| Instantiating (449) with all_302_0_253 yields:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| (450) (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_253) | ( ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_253)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								| (454)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									| (458)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										| (462)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											| (466)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												| (470)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																												|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													| (474)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																													|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																														|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																															|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (364), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																| (486)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (372), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.48/5.27  																																																																																	| (490)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																	|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		| (494)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																		|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			| (498)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																			|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| Instantiating (498) with all_350_0_265 yields:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| (499) (all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_350_0_265 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_265)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (396), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				| (503)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																				|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					| (504) (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																					|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (504), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																						| (505) (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																						|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (505), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							| (506) all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (506) yields:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (507) all_262_0_208 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (508) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (516)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (520)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, 0, all_22_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							| (523) all_262_0_208 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																							|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (523) yields:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (507) all_262_0_208 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (525) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								| (529)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (404), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									| (533)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										| (537)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.48/5.28  																																																																																											| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																											| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																											| (541)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												| (545)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													| (549)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																						| (552)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (552) yields:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| (553)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| (554) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							| (558)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								| (562)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																										| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.28  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												| (516)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (376), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													| (582)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (450), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														| (583) (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_253)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															| (584) (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (584), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (585) all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (585) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (586) all_302_0_253 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (587) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (594) all_302_0_253 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (594) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (586) all_302_0_253 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (596) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (600)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, 0, all_20_0_28 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															| (603)  ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_253
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (603) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (604)  ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (605) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_253
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																| (520)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (614) (all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (614), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (615) all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (615) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (616) all_350_0_265 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (508) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, 0, all_22_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (620) all_350_0_265 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (620) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (616) all_350_0_265 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (587) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		| (625)  ~ (all_350_0_265 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_265
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (625) yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (626)  ~ (all_350_0_265 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (627) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_265
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_302_0_253, all_350_0_265 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_265, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_253, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (628) all_350_0_265 = all_302_0_253
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_262_0_208, all_350_0_265 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_265, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (629) all_350_0_265 = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Combining equations (629,628) yields a new equation:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (630) all_302_0_253 = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Equations (630) can reduce 604 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (553)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| From (630) and (605) follows:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (554) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (25) with all_27_0_35, all_262_0_208, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (633) all_262_0_208 = 0 | all_27_0_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_262_0_208, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_208, yields:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (634) all_262_0_208 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (634), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			| (635) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (633), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (507) all_262_0_208 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					| Equations (507) can reduce 553 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (553)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				| (639) all_27_0_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (639), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																						| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.29  																																																																																																					| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																					| (643)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, 0, all_27_0_35 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_27_0_35, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																			| (646)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																			| (507) all_262_0_208 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																				| Equations (507) can reduce 553 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																														| (649)  ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_253
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (649) yields:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| (604)  ~ (all_302_0_253 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| (651) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_253
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_302_0_253, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_253, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| (586) all_302_0_253 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| Equations (586) can reduce 604 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																					| (654)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (654) yields:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| (553)  ~ (all_262_0_208 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| (656) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_208
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_262_0_208, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_208, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| (507) all_262_0_208 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| Equations (507) can reduce 553 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  											| (659) all_0_1_1 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.30  											|
% 19.71/5.30  												| Applying alpha-rule on (659) yields:
% 19.71/5.30  												| (660) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  												| (661) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.30  												|
% 19.71/5.30  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  												|
% 19.71/5.30  													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.30  													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  													|
% 19.71/5.30  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  												| (212)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  												|
% 19.71/5.30  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  													|
% 19.71/5.30  														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.30  														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  														|
% 19.71/5.30  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  													| (216)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  													|
% 19.71/5.30  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  														| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  														|
% 19.71/5.30  															| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.30  															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  															|
% 19.71/5.30  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  														| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  														| (220)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  														|
% 19.71/5.30  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  															| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  															|
% 19.71/5.30  																| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																|
% 19.71/5.30  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  															| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  															| (224)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  															|
% 19.71/5.30  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																|
% 19.71/5.30  																	| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																	|
% 19.71/5.30  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																| (228)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																|
% 19.71/5.30  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																	| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																	|
% 19.71/5.30  																		| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																		|
% 19.71/5.30  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																	| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																	| (232)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																	|
% 19.71/5.30  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																		| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																		|
% 19.71/5.30  																			| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																			|
% 19.71/5.30  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																		| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																		| (236) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																		|
% 19.71/5.30  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																			| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																			|
% 19.71/5.30  																				| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																				|
% 19.71/5.30  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																			| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																			| (240) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																			|
% 19.71/5.30  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																				| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																				|
% 19.71/5.30  																					| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																					|
% 19.71/5.30  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																				| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																				| (244) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																				|
% 19.71/5.30  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																					| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																					|
% 19.71/5.30  																						| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																					| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																					| (248) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.30  																					|
% 19.71/5.30  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.30  																						|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.30  																						| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.30  																						|
% 19.71/5.30  																							| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.30  																							| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.30  																							|
% 19.71/5.30  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.30  																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.30  																						| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.30  																						| (252) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																						|
% 19.71/5.31  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																							| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																							|
% 19.71/5.31  																								| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																							| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																							| (256) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																							|
% 19.71/5.31  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																								| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																									| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																								| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																								| (260) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																									| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																										| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																									| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																									| (264) all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																											|
% 19.71/5.31  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																										| (268) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																											|
% 19.71/5.31  																												| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																												|
% 19.71/5.31  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																											| (272) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																											|
% 19.71/5.31  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																												|
% 19.71/5.31  																													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																													|
% 19.71/5.31  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																												| (276) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																												|
% 19.71/5.31  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																													| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																													|
% 19.71/5.31  																														| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																														|
% 19.71/5.31  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																													| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																													| (280) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																													|
% 19.71/5.31  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																														| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																														|
% 19.71/5.31  																															| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																															|
% 19.71/5.31  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																														| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																														| (284) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																														|
% 19.71/5.31  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																															| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																															|
% 19.71/5.31  																																| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																|
% 19.71/5.31  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																															| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																															| (288) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																															|
% 19.71/5.31  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																|
% 19.71/5.31  																																	| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																| (292) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																|
% 19.71/5.31  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																	| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|
% 19.71/5.31  																																		| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																	| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																	| (296) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																	|
% 19.71/5.31  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																		| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|
% 19.71/5.31  																																			| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																		| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																		| (300) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																		|
% 19.71/5.31  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																			| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|
% 19.71/5.31  																																				| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																			| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																			| (304) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																			|
% 19.71/5.31  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																				| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|
% 19.71/5.31  																																					| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																				| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																				| (308) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																				|
% 19.71/5.31  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																					| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|
% 19.71/5.31  																																						| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																					| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																					| (312) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																					|
% 19.71/5.31  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																						| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|
% 19.71/5.31  																																							| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																							| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																						| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																						| (316) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																						|
% 19.71/5.31  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																							| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|
% 19.71/5.31  																																								| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																							| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																							| (320) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																							|
% 19.71/5.31  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																								| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																																									| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																								| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																								| (324) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																								|
% 19.71/5.31  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																									| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																									| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																									| (328) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																									|
% 19.71/5.31  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																										| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																																											| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																											|
% 19.71/5.31  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																										| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.31  																																										| (332) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.31  																																										|
% 19.71/5.31  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.31  																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.31  																																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.31  																																											|
% 19.71/5.31  																																												| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.31  																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.31  																																												|
% 19.71/5.31  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.31  																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.31  																																											| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																											| (336) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																											|
% 19.71/5.32  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																												| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																												|
% 19.71/5.32  																																													| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																												| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																												| (340) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																												|
% 19.71/5.32  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																													| (344) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																														| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																															| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																														| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																														| (348) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																															| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																															| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																															| (352) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																															|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																| (356) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	| (360) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																	|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		| (364) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																		|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			| (368) all_22_0_30 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																			|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				| (372) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																				|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					| (221) all_27_0_35 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						| Equations (221) can reduce 87 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					| (87)  ~ (all_27_0_35 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					| (376) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																					|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						| (380) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																						|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							| (384) all_20_0_28 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																							|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								| (388) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																								|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									| (392) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																									|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										| (396) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																										|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											| (400) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																											|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												| (404) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																												|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													| (408)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																													|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																															| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.32  																																																															|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														| (412)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.32  																																																														|
% 19.71/5.32  																																																															| Instantiating (412) with all_262_0_640 yields:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															| (866) (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640) | ( ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_640)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (348), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															| (417)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (380), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																| (421)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	| (425)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (400), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		| (429)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			| (433)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				| (437)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					| (441)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						| (445)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							| (449)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| Instantiating (449) with all_302_0_685 yields:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| (903) (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_685) | ( ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_685)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								| (454)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									| (458)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										| (462)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											| (466)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												| (470)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													| (474)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														| (478)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															| (482)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (364), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																| (486)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (372), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	| (490)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		| (494)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			| (498)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| Instantiating (498) with all_350_0_697 yields:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| (952) (all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_350_0_697 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_697)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (396), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.33  																																																																																				| (503)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																				|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (866), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																					| (957) (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																					|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (957), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						| (958) (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (958), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (959) all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (959) yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (960) all_262_0_640 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (508) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (516)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (520)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, 0, all_22_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (976) all_262_0_640 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (976) yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (960) all_262_0_640 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (525) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (529)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (404), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (533)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (537)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (541)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (545)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (50)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (549)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = all_0_4_4, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (100) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| Equations (100) can reduce 50 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						| (1005)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																						|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1005) yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (1006)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (1007) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							| (1011)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																							|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								| (558)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																								|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									| (562)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																									|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										| (566)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																										|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											| (570)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																											|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																												|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													| (516)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																													|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (376), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														| (582)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																														|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (903), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															| (1040) (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_685)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																															|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1040), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																| (1041) (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1041), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																	| (1042) all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1042) yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| (1043) all_302_0_685 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| (587) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.34  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																	| (1051) all_302_0_685 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																	|
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1051) yields:
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| (1043) all_302_0_685 = 0
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| (596) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																			| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| (74)  ~ (all_20_0_28 = 0)
% 19.71/5.35  																																																																																																		| (600)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, 0, all_20_0_28 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_20_0_28, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| (213) all_20_0_28 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| Equations (213) can reduce 74 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| (1060)  ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_685
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (1060) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| (1061)  ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| (1062) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_685
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| (78)  ~ (all_22_0_30 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	| (520)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																	|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		| (20)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																		|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (952), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| (1071) (all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1071), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1072) all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1072) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (1073) all_350_0_697 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (508) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, 0, all_22_0_30 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_22_0_30, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (209) all_22_0_30 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Equations (209) can reduce 78 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1077) all_350_0_697 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1077) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (1073) all_350_0_697 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (587) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, 0, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (96) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Equations (96) can reduce 20 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			| (1082)  ~ (all_350_0_697 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_697
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																			|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1082) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1083)  ~ (all_350_0_697 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1084) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_697
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_302_0_685, all_350_0_697 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_697, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_302_0_685, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1085) all_350_0_697 = all_302_0_685
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_262_0_640, all_350_0_697 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_350_0_697, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1086) all_350_0_697 = all_262_0_640
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Combining equations (1086,1085) yields a new equation:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1087) all_302_0_685 = all_262_0_640
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Equations (1087) can reduce 1061 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1006)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| From (1087) and (1062) follows:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1007) distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (25) with all_25_0_33, all_262_0_640, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1090) all_262_0_640 = 0 | all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (32) with all_262_0_640, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_262_0_640, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1091) all_262_0_640 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1091), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1092) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1090), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (960) all_262_0_640 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						| Equations (960) can reduce 1006 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (1006)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (1096) all_25_0_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1096), into two cases.
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						| (83)  ~ (all_25_0_33 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						| (1100)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, 0, all_25_0_33 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_25_0_33, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| (225) all_25_0_33 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| Equations (225) can reduce 83 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (1103)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				| (960) all_262_0_640 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																				|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| Equations (960) can reduce 1006 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																															| (1106)  ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_685
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																															|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1106) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| (1061)  ~ (all_302_0_685 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| (1108) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_685
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_302_0_685, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_302_0_685, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| (1043) all_302_0_685 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| Equations (1043) can reduce 1061 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																					| (1111)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_640
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																					|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1111) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| (1006)  ~ (all_262_0_640 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| (1113) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_640
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_262_0_640, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_262_0_640, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| (960) all_262_0_640 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| Equations (960) can reduce 1006 to:
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						|
% 19.99/5.35  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  										|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  										| (1116)  ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_31_0_39
% 19.99/5.35  										|
% 19.99/5.35  											| Applying alpha-rule on (1116) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  											| (131)  ~ (all_31_0_39 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  											| (1118) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_31_0_39
% 19.99/5.35  											|
% 19.99/5.35  											| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_31_0_39, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_31_0_39, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  											| (1119) all_31_0_39 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  											|
% 19.99/5.35  											| Equations (1119) can reduce 131 to:
% 19.99/5.35  											| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  											|
% 19.99/5.35  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  							|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  							| (1121)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_24_0_32
% 19.99/5.35  							|
% 19.99/5.35  								| Applying alpha-rule on (1121) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  								| (120)  ~ (all_24_0_32 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  								| (1123) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_24_0_32
% 19.99/5.35  								|
% 19.99/5.35  								| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_24_0_32, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_24_0_32, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.35  								| (1124) all_24_0_32 = 0
% 19.99/5.35  								|
% 19.99/5.35  								| Equations (1124) can reduce 120 to:
% 19.99/5.35  								| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.35  								|
% 19.99/5.35  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.35  						|-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.35  						| (1126)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_29_0_37
% 19.99/5.35  						|
% 19.99/5.35  							| Applying alpha-rule on (1126) yields:
% 19.99/5.35  							| (117)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 19.99/5.35  							| (1128) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_29_0_37
% 19.99/5.35  							|
% 19.99/5.35  							| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_29_0_37, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_29_0_37, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.36  							| (1129) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 19.99/5.36  							|
% 19.99/5.36  							| Equations (1129) can reduce 117 to:
% 19.99/5.36  							| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.36  							|
% 19.99/5.36  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.36  |-Branch two:
% 19.99/5.36  | (1131)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_0_38
% 19.99/5.36  |
% 19.99/5.36  	| Applying alpha-rule on (1131) yields:
% 19.99/5.36  	| (94)  ~ (all_30_0_38 = 0)
% 19.99/5.36  	| (1133) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_0_38
% 19.99/5.36  	|
% 19.99/5.36  	| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_30_0_38, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_30_0_38, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 19.99/5.36  	| (1134) all_30_0_38 = 0
% 19.99/5.36  	|
% 19.99/5.36  	| Equations (1134) can reduce 94 to:
% 19.99/5.36  	| (97) $false
% 19.99/5.36  	|
% 19.99/5.36  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 19.99/5.36  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.99/5.36  
% 19.99/5.36  4749ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------