TSTP Solution File: GEO187+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.40s 9.67s
% Output : Refutation 9.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:54:13 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.36 Fri Jun 17 20:54:13 2022
% 0.11/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8556.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.11/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.11/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.36
% 0.11/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.11/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.11/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.11/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.11/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.11/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.11/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.11/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.11/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.11/0.40 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.11/0.40 distinct function count: 2
% 0.11/0.40 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.40
% 0.11/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 -------- PROOF --------
% 9.40/9.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.40/9.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Model 4 [ 2 1 538 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 9.28 sec ----> 1287 [binary,1286.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Length of proof is 20. Level of proof is 10.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 9.40/9.67 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.40/9.67 % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 9.40/9.67 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 9.40/9.67 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 9.40/9.67 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 9.40/9.67 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 9.40/9.67 13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 9.40/9.67 15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 9.40/9.67 16 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 9.40/9.67 17 [] {+} distinct_points($c4,$c3).
% 9.40/9.67 18 [] {+} distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 9.40/9.67 19 [] {-} apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 20 [hyper,17,4] {+} distinct_points($c4,A)|distinct_points($c3,A).
% 9.40/9.67 21 [hyper,18,4] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c1,A).
% 9.40/9.67 22 [hyper,19,13] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|distinct_lines(line_connecting($c4,$c3),A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,A).
% 9.40/9.67 27 [hyper,22,11,17] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A)|apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c4,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,A).
% 9.40/9.67 30 [hyper,20,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c4,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 9.40/9.67 31 [hyper,20,1] {+} distinct_points($c3,$c4).
% 9.40/9.67 36 [hyper,21,4] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 9.40/9.67 56 [hyper,27,7,18,unit_del,15,16] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 69 [hyper,56,7,20,unit_del,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 79 [hyper,69,8,20,unit_del,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 81 [hyper,79,13] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c4,$c3),A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 9.40/9.67 85 [hyper,30,1] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points(A,$c4).
% 9.40/9.67 88 [hyper,85,4] {+} distinct_points(A,$c4)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 9.40/9.67 91 [hyper,81,11,31] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c4,A).
% 9.40/9.67 138 [hyper,36,4] {-} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 9.40/9.67 139 [factor,138.1.3,unit_del,1] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c1).
% 9.40/9.67 326 [hyper,88,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c4)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 9.40/9.67 1265 [hyper,91,8,139,unit_del,16,15,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c4,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 1278 [hyper,1265,8,326,unit_del,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 9.40/9.67 1286 [hyper,1278,7,326] {-} distinct_points($c4,$c4).
% 9.40/9.67 1287 [binary,1286.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 % SZS output end Refutation
% 9.40/9.67 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 ============ end of search ============
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 true clauses given 20 (31.7%)
% 9.40/9.67 false clauses given 43
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 FALSE TRUE
% 9.40/9.67 5 0 1
% 9.40/9.67 9 3 0
% 9.40/9.67 12 11 0
% 9.40/9.67 15 7 0
% 9.40/9.67 17 0 13
% 9.40/9.67 20 0 14
% 9.40/9.67 23 0 19
% 9.40/9.67 25 0 3
% 9.40/9.67 26 0 76
% 9.40/9.67 28 0 14
% 9.40/9.67 29 0 159
% 9.40/9.67 31 0 46
% 9.40/9.67 32 0 174
% 9.40/9.67 34 0 92
% 9.40/9.67 35 0 80
% 9.40/9.67 37 0 85
% 9.40/9.67 40 0 24
% 9.40/9.67 tot: 21 800 (97.4% true)
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Model 4 [ 2 1 538 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 9.40/9.67
% 9.40/9.67 Process 8556 finished Fri Jun 17 20:54:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------