TSTP Solution File: GEO185+2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO185+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Zu8f3JsxZO true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:57:16 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 8 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 117 ( 19 ~; 8 |; 6 &; 80 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 ^; 17 !; 0 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(distinct_points_type,type,
distinct_points: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(apart_point_and_line_type,type,
apart_point_and_line: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(intersection_point_type,type,
intersection_point: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(convergent_lines_type,type,
convergent_lines: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__3_type,type,
sk__3: $i ).
thf(con2,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
( ( convergent_lines @ X @ Y )
=> ( ( ( apart_point_and_line @ Z @ X )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ Z @ Y ) )
=> ( distinct_points @ Z @ ( intersection_point @ X @ Y ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( convergent_lines @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( distinct_points @ X2 @ ( intersection_point @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[con2]) ).
thf(con,conjecture,
! [X: $i,Y: $i,U: $i,V: $i] :
( ( ( distinct_points @ X @ Y )
& ( convergent_lines @ U @ V )
& ~ ( distinct_points @ X @ ( intersection_point @ U @ V ) ) )
=> ( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X @ U )
& ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X @ V ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X: $i,Y: $i,U: $i,V: $i] :
( ( ( distinct_points @ X @ Y )
& ( convergent_lines @ U @ V )
& ~ ( distinct_points @ X @ ( intersection_point @ U @ V ) ) )
=> ( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X @ U )
& ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X @ V ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[con]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
~ ( distinct_points @ sk_ @ ( intersection_point @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl37,plain,
( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__3 )
| ~ ( convergent_lines @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl8,zip_derived_cl15]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl16,plain,
convergent_lines @ sk__2 @ sk__3,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl38,plain,
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__3 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl37,zip_derived_cl16]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
( ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__2 )
| ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( convergent_lines @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( distinct_points @ X2 @ ( intersection_point @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[con2]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15_001,plain,
~ ( distinct_points @ sk_ @ ( intersection_point @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl42,plain,
( ~ ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__2 )
| ~ ( convergent_lines @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl15]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl16_002,plain,
convergent_lines @ sk__2 @ sk__3,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl43,plain,
~ ( apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__2 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl42,zip_derived_cl16]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl44,plain,
apart_point_and_line @ sk_ @ sk__3,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl43]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl45,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl38,zip_derived_cl44]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO185+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Zu8f3JsxZO true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 00:17:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.72 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.55/0.72 % BCE start: 18
% 0.55/0.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.72 % PE start: 18
% 0.55/0.72 logic: neq
% 0.55/0.72 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.55/0.72 % done 23 iterations in 0.012s
% 0.55/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.55/0.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.72
% 0.55/0.72
% 0.55/0.72 % Terminating...
% 0.59/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.47/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------