TSTP Solution File: GEO184+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  10 unt;   4 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc7,skc6),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    incident_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    incident_point_and_line(skc6,skc4),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ~ equal_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( equal_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(u,v) ),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(34,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ distinct_points(w,x)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
    file('GEO184+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,28]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.0,28.0')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,28]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,28.0')] ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc6,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc6,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,51]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,51.0')] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,33]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,33.0')] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,34]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,34.0')] ).

cnf(69,plain,
    distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:18.1,8.0')] ).

cnf(862,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[69,63]),
    [iquote('0:Res:69.0,63.0')] ).

cnf(885,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[862,52,67,66,62]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:862.0,862.1,862.2,862.3,52.0,67.0,66.0,62.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:39:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.52  SPASS derived 822 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 600 clauses.
% 0.19/0.52  SPASS allocated 98158 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.52  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.52  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.52  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.52  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.52  		0:00:00.07 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 17 :
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.52  Formulae used in the proof : con ax2 a4 ci1 ci2 cu1
% 0.19/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------