TSTP Solution File: GEO184+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 8.18s 3.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  13 unt;  20 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  19   ~;  20   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (;  30   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_438,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & incident_point_and_line(X,U)
          & incident_point_and_line(Y,U) )
       => equal_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_420,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

tff(f_410,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    ! [X_103,Y_104] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_103,Y_104)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(X_103,Y_104) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_420]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_120]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_120]) ).

tff(c_156,plain,
    ! [X_117,Y_118] :
      ( equal_lines(X_117,Y_118)
      | distinct_lines(X_117,Y_118) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_410]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ equal_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_438]) ).

tff(c_164,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_94]) ).

tff(c_3459,plain,
    ! [Y_386,V_387,U_388,X_389] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_386,V_387)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_386,U_388)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_389,V_387)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_389,U_388)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_388,V_387)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_389,Y_386) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_4877,plain,
    ! [Y_453,X_454] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_453,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_453,'#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_454,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_454,'#skF_3')
      | ~ distinct_points(X_454,Y_453) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_3459]) ).

tff(c_4903,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_4877]) ).

tff(c_4938,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_132,c_4903]) ).

tff(c_5299,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_4938]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_5306,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5299,c_14]) ).

tff(c_5312,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_102,c_5306]) ).

tff(c_5313,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_4938]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_5321,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5313,c_16]) ).

tff(c_5327,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_102,c_5321]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO184+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:33:24 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.18/3.02  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.18/3.03  
% 8.18/3.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.89/3.06  
% 8.89/3.06  Inference rules
% 8.89/3.06  ----------------------
% 8.89/3.06  #Ref     : 0
% 8.89/3.06  #Sup     : 1200
% 8.89/3.06  #Fact    : 54
% 8.89/3.06  #Define  : 0
% 8.89/3.06  #Split   : 4
% 8.89/3.06  #Chain   : 0
% 8.89/3.06  #Close   : 0
% 8.89/3.06  
% 8.89/3.06  Ordering : KBO
% 8.89/3.06  
% 8.89/3.06  Simplification rules
% 8.89/3.06  ----------------------
% 8.89/3.06  #Subsume      : 118
% 8.89/3.06  #Demod        : 179
% 8.89/3.06  #Tautology    : 115
% 8.89/3.06  #SimpNegUnit  : 14
% 8.89/3.06  #BackRed      : 0
% 8.89/3.06  
% 8.89/3.06  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 8.89/3.06  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 8.89/3.06  
% 8.89/3.06  Timing (in seconds)
% 8.89/3.06  ----------------------
% 8.89/3.06  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 8.89/3.06  Parsing              : 0.31
% 8.89/3.06  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 8.89/3.06  Main loop            : 1.45
% 8.89/3.06  Inferencing          : 0.53
% 8.89/3.06  Reduction            : 0.38
% 8.89/3.06  Demodulation         : 0.24
% 8.89/3.06  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 8.89/3.06  Subsumption          : 0.39
% 8.89/3.06  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 8.89/3.06  MUC search           : 0.00
% 8.89/3.06  Cooper               : 0.00
% 8.89/3.06  Total                : 2.06
% 8.89/3.06  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 8.89/3.06  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 8.89/3.06  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 8.89/3.06  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------