TSTP Solution File: GEO183+2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:46:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.71s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 9 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 58 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 6 >; 6 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 0 sgn; 23 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& ~ distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(apart1,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).
fof(con1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& ~ distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X31,X32,X33] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X31,X32)
| distinct_lines(X32,X33)
| apart_point_and_line(X31,X33) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& ~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X18,X19,X20] :
( ( distinct_points(X20,X18)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X20,line_connecting(X18,X19))
| ~ distinct_points(X18,X19) )
& ( distinct_points(X20,X19)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X20,line_connecting(X18,X19))
| ~ distinct_points(X18,X19) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X6] : ~ distinct_points(X6,X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X3))
| ~ distinct_points(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2))
| ~ distinct_points(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : GEO183+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:14:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.69 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.71 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.71 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.71 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.71 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.71 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.72 % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.72 % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------