TSTP Solution File: GEO183+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:14:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  101 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  45   ~;  32   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  40   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f67,f100,f118]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ~ spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f114,f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) )
    & ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f20,f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
          | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
        & ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
   => ( ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
        | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) )
      & ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
      & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
      & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
          & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X3,X4] :
        ( ( ~ distinct_lines(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1))
          & convergent_lines(X3,X4)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X3) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ distinct_lines(X3,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & convergent_lines(X3,X4)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f110,f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,X0))
        | ~ distinct_points(sK0,X0) )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f102,f48]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci1) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
        | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f62,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
        | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ceq2) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f99]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f97,f43]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f82,f41]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ distinct_points(X0,sK1)
        | distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(X0,sK1)) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f80,f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ci2) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,X0)
        | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f56,f66]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f44,f64,f60]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:46:21 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % (23991)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.15/0.37  % (23995)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23996)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23993)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23998)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [3,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [3,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [4,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [4,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [3]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [5,2]
% 0.15/0.37  TRYING [5,2]
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Memory used [KB]: 787
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (23997)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (23991)Success in time 0.008 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------