TSTP Solution File: GEO183+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:58:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:51:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.56/0.77  # Version:  1.3
% 0.56/0.77  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/0.77  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.56/0.77  fof(con,conjecture,(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y))))=>((~apart_point_and_line(X,U))&(~apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))))),input).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y))))=>((~apart_point_and_line(X,U))&(~apart_point_and_line(Y,U))))))))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[con])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))=>(~apart_point_and_line(X,U)&~apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c0])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:(?[U]:(?[V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U))))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c1])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:(?[U]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&(?[V]:convergent_lines(U,V)))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c2])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(((distinct_points(X2,X3)&(?[X5]:convergent_lines(X4,X5)))&~distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X2,X3)))&(apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c3])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(((distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002)&convergent_lines(skolem0003,skolem0004))&~distinct_lines(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)))&(apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003))),inference(skolemize,status(esa),[c4])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(ci2,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>(~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)))))),input).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c36,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[ci2])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c37,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(~distinct_points(X,Y)|~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c36])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c38,axiom,(![X23]:(![X24]:(~distinct_points(X23,X24)|~apart_point_and_line(X24,line_connecting(X23,X24))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c37])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c39,axiom,~distinct_points(X46,X47)|~apart_point_and_line(X47,line_connecting(X46,X47)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c38])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,~distinct_lines(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(ceq2,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(apart_point_and_line(X,Y)=>(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),input).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c15,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(~apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ceq2])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c16,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(~apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|(![Z]:(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c15])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c18,axiom,(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(~apart_point_and_line(X9,X10)|(distinct_lines(X10,X11)|apart_point_and_line(X9,X11)))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c17,axiom,(![X9]:(![X10]:(~apart_point_and_line(X9,X10)|(![X11]:(distinct_lines(X10,X11)|apart_point_and_line(X9,X11)))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c16])).])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c19,axiom,~apart_point_and_line(X56,X55)|distinct_lines(X55,X54)|apart_point_and_line(X56,X54),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c18])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(ci1,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>(~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)))))),input).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c40,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[ci1])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c41,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(~distinct_points(X,Y)|~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c40])).
% 0.56/0.77  fof(c42,axiom,(![X25]:(![X26]:(~distinct_points(X25,X26)|~apart_point_and_line(X25,line_connecting(X25,X26))))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c41])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c43,axiom,~distinct_points(X49,X48)|~apart_point_and_line(X49,line_connecting(X49,X48)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c42])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c5])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c72,plain,distinct_lines(skolem0003,X84)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,X84)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c19, c9])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c136,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002))|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c72, c8])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c728,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003)|~distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c136, c43])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c737,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c728, c6])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c742,plain,distinct_lines(skolem0003,X265)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,X265),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c737, c19])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c747,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c742, c8])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c769,plain,~distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c747, c39])).
% 0.56/0.77  cnf(c774,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c769, c6])).
% 0.56/0.77  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.56/0.77  
% 0.56/0.77  # Initial clauses    : 18
% 0.56/0.77  # Processed clauses  : 95
% 0.56/0.77  # Factors computed   : 42
% 0.56/0.77  # Resolvents computed: 668
% 0.56/0.77  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.56/0.77  # Forward subsumed   : 137
% 0.56/0.77  # Backward subsumed  : 9
% 0.56/0.77  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.56/0.77  # User time          : 0.414 s
% 0.56/0.77  # System time        : 0.015 s
% 0.56/0.77  # Total time         : 0.429 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------