TSTP Solution File: GEO183+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 22:55:54 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.61  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.61  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.61  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.19/0.61  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.61  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  % File     : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.56/0.61  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.56/0.61  % Problem  : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.56/0.61  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.56/0.61  % English  : If X and Y are distinct points, then they are incident with
% 0.56/0.61  %            the line that is equal to the line connecting the points.
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.56/0.61  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.56/0.61  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.56/0.61  % Names    : Lemma 4.5.i [vPl95]
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.56/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Number of connectives :   35 (  10   ~;   9   |;   4   &)
% 0.56/0.62  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.62  %            Number of variables   :   37 (  37   !;   0   ?)
% 0.56/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.56/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.56/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.62      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.56/0.62        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.56/0.62          & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 0.56/0.62          & ~ distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
% 0.56/0.62       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 0.56/0.62          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) ) ).
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.62  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.62  %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.56/0.62  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.56/0.62  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.56/0.62  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.56/0.62  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.56/0.62  %goalClause: 1 2 6 7
% 0.56/0.62  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.56/0.62  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.56/0.62  [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.56/0.62  [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.56/0.62  [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.56/0.62  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.56/0.62  [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 0.56/0.62  [7]P3(a1,a3)+P3(a2,a3)
% 0.56/0.62  [14]~P1(x141,x142)+~P3(x142,f5(x141,x142))
% 0.56/0.62  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P3(x151,f5(x151,x152))
% 0.56/0.62  [16]~P2(x161,x162)+~P3(f6(x161,x162),x162)
% 0.56/0.62  [17]~P2(x171,x172)+~P3(f6(x171,x172),x171)
% 0.56/0.62  [8]~P1(x83,x81)+P1(x81,x82)+P1(x83,x82)
% 0.56/0.62  [9]~P3(x91,x93)+P1(x91,x92)+P3(x92,x93)
% 0.56/0.62  [10]~P4(x103,x101)+P4(x101,x102)+P4(x103,x102)
% 0.56/0.62  [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.56/0.62  [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 0.56/0.62  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 0.56/0.62  [18]P3(x184,x183)+~P1(x184,x181)+~P4(x183,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x183)+P3(x184,x182)
% 0.56/0.62  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.62  
% 0.56/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.62  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.56/0.62     (~P2(x201,x201)),
% 0.56/0.62     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.56/0.62  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.56/0.62     (~P3(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 0.56/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,20,2,13,11,10,8,17,16,15,14])).
% 0.56/0.62  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.56/0.62     (~P3(a1,a3)),
% 0.56/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,20,2,6,13,11,10,8,17,16,15,14,12])).
% 0.56/0.62  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.56/0.62     (P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.56/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,7])).
% 0.56/0.62  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.56/0.62     ($false),
% 0.56/0.62     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,35,39,12]),
% 0.56/0.62     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.62  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.62  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------