TSTP Solution File: GEO183+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.04s 1.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  15   ~;  10   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (   6   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_146,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & convergent_lines(U,V)
          & ~ distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X,U)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_124,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

tff(f_83,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_88,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [X_49,Z_50,Y_51] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_49,Z_50)
      | distinct_lines(Y_51,Z_50)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_49,Y_51) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [Z_55] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',Z_55)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_3',Z_55) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_59]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_146]) ).

tff(c_75,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_32]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_83]) ).

tff(c_82,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_14]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_82]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    ! [X_67,Z_68,Y_69] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_67,Z_68)
      | distinct_lines(Y_69,Z_68)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_67,Y_69) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ! [Z_71] :
      ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',Z_71)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_3',Z_71) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_98]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_32]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_88]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_16]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_36,c_127]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:28:28 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.04/1.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.04/1.75  
% 3.04/1.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.16/1.78  
% 3.16/1.78  Inference rules
% 3.16/1.78  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.78  #Ref     : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Sup     : 17
% 3.16/1.78  #Fact    : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Define  : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Split   : 1
% 3.16/1.78  #Chain   : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Close   : 0
% 3.16/1.78  
% 3.16/1.78  Ordering : KBO
% 3.16/1.78  
% 3.16/1.78  Simplification rules
% 3.16/1.78  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.78  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Demod        : 6
% 3.16/1.78  #Tautology    : 4
% 3.16/1.78  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.16/1.78  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.16/1.78  
% 3.16/1.78  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.16/1.78  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.16/1.78  
% 3.16/1.78  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.16/1.78  ----------------------
% 3.16/1.78  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 3.16/1.78  Parsing              : 0.26
% 3.16/1.78  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.16/1.78  Main loop            : 0.25
% 3.16/1.78  Inferencing          : 0.11
% 3.16/1.78  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.16/1.78  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.16/1.78  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.16/1.78  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.16/1.78  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.16/1.78  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.16/1.78  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.16/1.78  Total                : 0.76
% 3.16/1.78  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.16/1.78  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.78  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.16/1.78  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------