TSTP Solution File: GEO182+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GEO182+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:46:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 26
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 50 ( 15 unt; 19 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 20 ~; 17 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 30 ( 16 >; 14 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 13 ( 12 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 3 sgn; 37 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
point: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
line: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_34,type,
equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_35,type,
parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_36,type,
incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_37,type,
orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_38,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(apart2,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart2) ).
fof(apart5,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).
fof(cp1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).
fof(p1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).
fof(cp2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X38,X39,X40] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X38,X39)
| distinct_lines(X39,X40)
| apart_point_and_line(X38,X40) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X17,X18)
| distinct_lines(X17,X19)
| distinct_lines(X18,X19) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X12] : ~ distinct_lines(X12,X12),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X44,X45] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X44,X45)
| convergent_lines(X44,X45) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X2)
| distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X46,X47] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X47,X46),X47),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X48,X49] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X48,parallel_through_point(X49,X48)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO182+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:32:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.016000 s
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.020000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------