TSTP Solution File: GEO182+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO182+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.32s 2.58s
% Output : Refutation 2.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GEO182+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:59:31 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35 Sat Jun 18 00:59:31 2022
% 0.18/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 1254.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.18/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.18/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.37 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.37 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.37 number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.18/0.37 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.18/0.37 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.18/0.37 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.37 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.37 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.18/0.37 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.18/0.37 distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.37 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37
% 0.18/0.37 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.32/2.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.32/2.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 4 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 5 [ 1 1 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 6 [ 1 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 7 [ 2 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 8 [ 2 0 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 9 [ 2 0 82 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 10 [ 3 1 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 11 [ 3 1 100 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 12 [ 4 0 69 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 13 [ 4 0 81 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 14 [ 5 0 66 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 15 [ 5 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 16 [ 5 1 2228 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 17 [ 9 0 879 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.20 sec ----> 958 [binary,957.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Length of proof is 19. Level of proof is 9.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.32/2.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.32/2.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 2.32/2.58 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 2.32/2.58 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,A).
% 2.32/2.58 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,B).
% 2.32/2.58 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 2.32/2.58 13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 2.32/2.58 15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c3)).
% 2.32/2.58 16 [] {+} distinct_points($c3,$c2).
% 2.32/2.58 17 [] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 2.32/2.58 18 [hyper,16,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 2.32/2.58 19 [hyper,17,13] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 2.32/2.58 25 [hyper,18,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 2.32/2.58 26 [hyper,18,1] {+} distinct_points($c2,$c3).
% 2.32/2.58 30 [hyper,19,11,16] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A).
% 2.32/2.58 43 [hyper,25,1] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 2.32/2.58 45 [hyper,25,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 2.32/2.58 46 [factor,45.1.3,unit_del,1] {-} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 2.32/2.58 48 [hyper,43,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 2.32/2.58 50 [hyper,46,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 2.32/2.58 55 [hyper,48,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c2,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 2.32/2.58 56 [hyper,48,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 2.32/2.58 125 [hyper,30,7,56,unit_del,1,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A).
% 2.32/2.58 217 [hyper,50,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c3,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 2.32/2.58 361 [hyper,55,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c2).
% 2.32/2.58 393 [hyper,217,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c3).
% 2.32/2.58 593 [hyper,125,8,361,unit_del,1,1,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,A).
% 2.32/2.58 800 [hyper,593,8,26,unit_del,15,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c3)).
% 2.32/2.58 957 [hyper,800,7,393,unit_del,1,factor_simp] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 2.32/2.58 958 [binary,957.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.32/2.58 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 ============ end of search ============
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 true clauses given 3 (4.8%)
% 2.32/2.58 false clauses given 60
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 FALSE TRUE
% 2.32/2.58 5 0 1
% 2.32/2.58 10 8 0
% 2.32/2.58 12 6 16
% 2.32/2.58 13 33 3
% 2.32/2.58 14 4 0
% 2.32/2.58 15 24 0
% 2.32/2.58 16 48 4
% 2.32/2.58 18 2 0
% 2.32/2.58 19 29 7
% 2.32/2.58 22 1 0
% 2.32/2.58 23 6 0
% 2.32/2.58 25 21 0
% 2.32/2.58 26 24 0
% 2.32/2.58 28 49 0
% 2.32/2.58 29 32 0
% 2.32/2.58 31 28 0
% 2.32/2.58 32 6 0
% 2.32/2.58 33 3 0
% 2.32/2.58 36 8 0
% 2.32/2.58 39 6 0
% 2.32/2.58 41 1 0
% 2.32/2.58 42 6 0
% 2.32/2.58 44 2 0
% 2.32/2.58 tot: 347 31 (8.2% true)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Model 17 [ 9 0 879 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.32/2.58
% 2.32/2.58 Process 1254 finished Sat Jun 18 00:59:33 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------