TSTP Solution File: GEO181+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.04s 3.79s
% Output   : Proof 23.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : GEO181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:54:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.54/0.62          ____       _                          
% 0.54/0.62    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.54/0.62   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.54/0.62  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.54/0.62  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.54/0.62  
% 0.54/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.54/0.62  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.54/0.62  
% 0.54/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.54/0.62  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.54/0.62  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.54/0.62  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.54/0.62  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.54/0.62  
% 0.54/0.62  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.54/0.62  
% 0.54/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.70/0.97  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.02/1.11  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.02/1.13  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.68/1.33  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.68/1.34  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.68/1.36  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.45  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.38/1.51  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.38/1.51  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.48/1.53  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.91/1.64  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.91/1.65  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.84/1.89  Prover 2: gave up
% 4.84/1.89  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 5.23/1.90  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.23/1.92  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.23/1.92  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.23/1.96  Prover 3: gave up
% 5.23/1.96  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 5.23/1.98  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.63/2.04  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.63/2.05  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.44/3.17  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.44/3.19  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 11.01/3.27  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.04/3.79  Prover 5: proved (619ms)
% 13.04/3.79  Prover 4: stopped
% 13.04/3.79  
% 13.04/3.79  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 13.04/3.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 13.04/3.79  
% 13.04/3.79  Generating proof ... found it (size 426)
% 23.07/6.13  
% 23.07/6.13  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 23.07/6.13  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 23.07/6.13  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v2) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 23.07/6.18  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.18  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 23.07/6.18  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.18  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 23.07/6.18  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.18  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 23.07/6.18  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.18  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.18  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.18  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 23.07/6.18  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.18  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 23.07/6.19  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.19  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.19  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 23.07/6.19  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.19  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 23.07/6.19  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 23.07/6.19  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 23.07/6.19  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.19  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.19  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.19  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.19  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.19  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 23.07/6.19  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 23.07/6.19  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 23.07/6.19  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 23.07/6.19  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 23.07/6.19  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 23.07/6.19  | (37)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v2) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 23.07/6.19  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0))
% 23.07/6.19  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 23.07/6.20  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 23.07/6.20  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 23.07/6.20  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.20  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 23.07/6.20  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 23.07/6.20  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 23.07/6.20  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating (37) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (47)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0) & line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1 & line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (47) yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (48) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 23.07/6.20  | (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0
% 23.07/6.20  | (50) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 23.07/6.20  | (51) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1
% 23.07/6.20  | (52) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 23.07/6.20  | (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (54)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (19) with 0, 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (55)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (57) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (59)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating formula (7) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (60) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.07/6.20  |
% 23.07/6.20  | Instantiating (59) with all_16_0_6, all_16_1_7, all_16_2_8 yields:
% 23.07/6.20  | (61) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6 & ( ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (61) yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (62) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 23.07/6.21  | (63) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8
% 23.07/6.21  | (64) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 23.07/6.21  | (65)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Instantiating (58) with all_18_0_9, all_18_1_10, all_18_2_11 yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (66) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_18_1_10 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_9 & ( ~ (all_18_1_10 = 0) | all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (66) yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (67) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11
% 23.07/6.21  | (68) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_18_2_11) = all_18_1_10
% 23.07/6.21  | (69) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_9
% 23.07/6.21  | (70)  ~ (all_18_1_10 = 0) | all_18_0_9 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Instantiating (56) with all_20_0_12, all_20_1_13, all_20_2_14 yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (71) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_0_12 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_20_1_13 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14 & ( ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | (all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_20_1_13 = 0))
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (71) yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (72) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_0_12
% 23.07/6.21  | (73) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_20_1_13
% 23.07/6.21  | (74) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14
% 23.07/6.21  | (75)  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | (all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_20_1_13 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Instantiating (55) with all_22_0_15, all_22_1_16, all_22_2_17 yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (76) intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_22_2_17 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_22_1_16) = all_22_0_15 & ( ~ (all_22_2_17 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (76) yields:
% 23.07/6.21  | (77) intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16
% 23.07/6.21  | (78) convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_22_2_17
% 23.07/6.21  | (79) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_22_1_16) = all_22_0_15
% 23.07/6.21  | (80)  ~ (all_22_2_17 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (57), into two cases.
% 23.07/6.21  |-Branch one:
% 23.07/6.21  | (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  	| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.07/6.21  	| (82) $false
% 23.07/6.21  	|
% 23.07/6.21  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.07/6.21  |-Branch two:
% 23.07/6.21  | (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  | (84)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.07/6.21  |
% 23.07/6.21  	| Instantiating (84) with all_28_0_18, all_28_1_19, all_28_2_20, all_28_3_21 yields:
% 23.07/6.21  	| (85) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_0_18 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_1_19 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_28_2_20 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_28_3_21 & ( ~ (all_28_2_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_3_21 = 0) | all_28_0_18 = 0 | all_28_1_19 = 0)
% 23.07/6.21  	|
% 23.07/6.21  	| Applying alpha-rule on (85) yields:
% 23.07/6.21  	| (86) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_28_2_20
% 23.07/6.21  	| (87) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_1_19
% 23.07/6.21  	| (88)  ~ (all_28_2_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_3_21 = 0) | all_28_0_18 = 0 | all_28_1_19 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  	| (89) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_28_3_21
% 23.07/6.21  	| (90) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_0_18
% 23.07/6.21  	|
% 23.07/6.21  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (60), into two cases.
% 23.07/6.21  	|-Branch one:
% 23.07/6.21  	| (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.07/6.21  	|
% 23.07/6.21  		| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.07/6.21  		| (82) $false
% 23.07/6.21  		|
% 23.07/6.21  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.07/6.21  	|-Branch two:
% 23.07/6.21  	| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.54/6.21  	| (94)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.21  	|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Instantiating (94) with all_33_0_22, all_33_1_23, all_33_2_24 yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (95) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_0_22 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_1_23 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_33_2_24 & ( ~ (all_33_2_24 = 0) | all_33_0_22 = 0 | all_33_1_23 = 0)
% 23.54/6.21  		|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (96) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_0_22
% 23.54/6.21  		| (97) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.21  		| (98) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_33_2_24
% 23.54/6.21  		| (99)  ~ (all_33_2_24 = 0) | all_33_0_22 = 0 | all_33_1_23 = 0
% 23.54/6.21  		|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (100) all_18_2_11 = all_1_2_2
% 23.54/6.21  		|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_28_0_18, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_0_18, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (101) all_28_0_18 = all_1_0_0
% 23.54/6.21  		|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_28_1_19, all_28_0_18 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_0_18, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_28_1_19, yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (102) all_28_0_18 = all_28_1_19
% 23.54/6.21  		|
% 23.54/6.21  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_33_1_23, all_33_0_22 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_1_23, yields:
% 23.54/6.21  		| (103) all_33_0_22 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_16_1_7, all_18_1_10 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (104) all_18_1_10 = all_16_1_7 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_18_1_10)
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_4_4 yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (105)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_2_14, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (106) all_20_2_14 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_16_2_8, all_20_2_14 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (107) all_20_2_14 = all_16_2_8
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Using (69) and (54) yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (108)  ~ (all_18_0_9 = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_16_0_6, all_18_0_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_9, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (109) all_18_0_9 = all_16_0_6
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Combining equations (102,101) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (110) all_28_1_19 = all_1_0_0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Simplifying 110 yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (111) all_28_1_19 = all_1_0_0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Combining equations (107,106) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (112) all_16_2_8 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Simplifying 112 yields:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (113) all_16_2_8 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| Equations (109) can reduce 108 to:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (100) and (67) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (48) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (111) and (87) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (100) and (68) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_18_1_10
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (103) and (96) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (97) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (113) and (63) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (52) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		| From (109) and (69) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (64) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (104), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.22  		|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (121)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_18_1_10)
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  			| Using (117) and (121) yields:
% 23.54/6.22  			| (122) $false
% 23.54/6.22  			|
% 23.54/6.22  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.22  		|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.22  		| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_18_1_10
% 23.54/6.22  		| (124) all_18_1_10 = all_16_1_7
% 23.54/6.22  		|
% 23.54/6.22  			| From (124) and (117) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  			| (62) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 23.54/6.22  			|
% 23.54/6.22  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.22  			|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.22  			| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  			|
% 23.54/6.22  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (75), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.22  				|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.22  				| (127)  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  				|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Equations (106) can reduce 127 to:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.22  				|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.22  				| (106) all_20_2_14 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  				| (130) all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_20_1_13 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  				|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Applying alpha-rule on (130) yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (131) all_20_0_12 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  					| (132) all_20_1_13 = 0
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| From (131) and (72) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (133) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| From (132) and (73) follows:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (134) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Using (89) and (105) yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (135)  ~ (all_28_3_21 = 0)
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (136) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (137) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Instantiating formula (28) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (138) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.22  					|
% 23.54/6.22  					| Instantiating formula (28) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.22  					| (139) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (42) with all_16_1_7, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (140) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (33) with all_22_1_16, all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (141)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_22_1_16) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0))))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (142)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (143)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (144)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (43) with 0, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (145)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (7) with all_16_1_7, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (146) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with all_28_3_21, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_28_3_21, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (147)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with all_28_3_21, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_28_3_21, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (148)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (6) with all_28_3_21, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_28_3_21, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (149)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (3) with all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (150) all_16_0_6 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_16_0_6, 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (151) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (39) with all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (152)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_16_0_6, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (153) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating formula (43) with all_16_0_6, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (154)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.23  					|
% 23.54/6.23  					| Instantiating (154) with all_60_0_25, all_60_1_26, all_60_2_27 yields:
% 23.54/6.23  					| (155) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_60_1_26 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_0_25 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_2_27 & ( ~ (all_60_1_26 = 0) |  ~ (all_60_2_27 = 0) | (all_60_0_25 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (155) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (156) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_60_1_26
% 23.54/6.24  					| (157) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_0_25
% 23.54/6.24  					| (158) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.24  					| (159)  ~ (all_60_1_26 = 0) |  ~ (all_60_2_27 = 0) | (all_60_0_25 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (141) with all_62_0_28, all_62_1_29, all_62_2_30 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (160) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_62_1_29 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_62_2_30 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_22_1_16) = all_62_0_28 & ( ~ (all_62_2_30 = 0) | all_62_0_28 = 0 | ( ~ (all_62_1_29 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (160) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (161) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_62_1_29
% 23.54/6.24  					| (162) convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_62_2_30
% 23.54/6.24  					| (163) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_22_1_16) = all_62_0_28
% 23.54/6.24  					| (164)  ~ (all_62_2_30 = 0) | all_62_0_28 = 0 | ( ~ (all_62_1_29 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (152) with all_64_0_31, all_64_1_32, all_64_2_33 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (165) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_64_2_33 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_64_2_33) = all_64_1_32 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_64_0_31 & ( ~ (all_64_1_32 = 0) | (all_64_0_31 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (165) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (166) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_64_2_33
% 23.54/6.24  					| (167) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_64_2_33) = all_64_1_32
% 23.54/6.24  					| (168) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_64_0_31
% 23.54/6.24  					| (169)  ~ (all_64_1_32 = 0) | (all_64_0_31 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (149) with all_66_0_34, all_66_1_35, all_66_2_36 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (170) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_66_0_34 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_66_2_36 & ( ~ (all_66_1_35 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_2_36 = 0) | (all_66_0_34 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (170) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (171) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.24  					| (172) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_66_0_34
% 23.54/6.24  					| (173) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_66_2_36
% 23.54/6.24  					| (174)  ~ (all_66_1_35 = 0) |  ~ (all_66_2_36 = 0) | (all_66_0_34 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (145) with all_68_0_37, all_68_1_38, all_68_2_39 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (175) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_68_1_38 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_68_0_37 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_68_2_39 & ( ~ (all_68_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_68_2_39 = 0) | all_68_0_37 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (175) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (176) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_68_1_38
% 23.54/6.24  					| (177) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_68_0_37
% 23.54/6.24  					| (178) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_68_2_39
% 23.54/6.24  					| (179)  ~ (all_68_1_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_68_2_39 = 0) | all_68_0_37 = 0
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (144) with all_70_0_40, all_70_1_41, all_70_2_42 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (180) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_42 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_42) = all_70_1_41 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_40 & ( ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0) | all_70_0_40 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (180) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (181) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_42
% 23.54/6.24  					| (182) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_42) = all_70_1_41
% 23.54/6.24  					| (183) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_40
% 23.54/6.24  					| (184)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0) | all_70_0_40 = 0
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (148) with all_72_0_43, all_72_1_44, all_72_2_45 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (185) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_72_2_45 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_43 & ( ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0) | (all_72_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (185) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (186) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_72_2_45
% 23.54/6.24  					| (187) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44
% 23.54/6.24  					| (188) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_43
% 23.54/6.24  					| (189)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0) | (all_72_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (147) with all_74_0_46, all_74_1_47, all_74_2_48 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (190) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_74_2_48 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_74_2_48) = all_74_1_47 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_74_0_46 & ( ~ (all_74_1_47 = 0) | (all_74_0_46 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0))
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (190) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (191) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_74_2_48
% 23.54/6.24  					| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_74_2_48) = all_74_1_47
% 23.54/6.24  					| (193) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_74_0_46
% 23.54/6.24  					| (194)  ~ (all_74_1_47 = 0) | (all_74_0_46 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Instantiating (143) with all_76_0_49, all_76_1_50, all_76_2_51 yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (195) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_76_2_51 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_76_2_51) = all_76_1_50 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_49 & ( ~ (all_76_1_50 = 0) | all_76_0_49 = 0)
% 23.54/6.24  					|
% 23.54/6.24  					| Applying alpha-rule on (195) yields:
% 23.54/6.24  					| (196) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_76_2_51
% 23.54/6.25  					| (197) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_76_2_51) = all_76_1_50
% 23.54/6.25  					| (198) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_49
% 23.54/6.25  					| (199)  ~ (all_76_1_50 = 0) | all_76_0_49 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  					|
% 23.54/6.25  					| Instantiating (142) with all_78_0_52, all_78_1_53, all_78_2_54 yields:
% 23.54/6.25  					| (200) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_78_2_54 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_78_2_54) = all_78_1_53 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_78_0_52 & ( ~ (all_78_1_53 = 0) | all_78_0_52 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  					|
% 23.54/6.25  					| Applying alpha-rule on (200) yields:
% 23.54/6.25  					| (201) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_78_2_54
% 23.54/6.25  					| (202) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_78_2_54) = all_78_1_53
% 23.54/6.25  					| (203) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_78_0_52
% 23.54/6.25  					| (204)  ~ (all_78_1_53 = 0) | all_78_0_52 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  					|
% 23.54/6.25  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  					|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  					| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  					|
% 23.54/6.25  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (150), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  						|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  						| (206) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 23.54/6.25  						|
% 23.54/6.25  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  							|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  							| (207)  ~ (all_74_1_47 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  							|
% 23.54/6.25  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (146), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  								|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  								| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  								|
% 23.54/6.25  									| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.25  									| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.25  									|
% 23.54/6.25  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.25  								|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.25  								| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  								| (211)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.25  								|
% 23.54/6.25  									| Instantiating (211) with all_100_0_56, all_100_1_57, all_100_2_58 yields:
% 23.54/6.25  									| (212) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_0_56 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_57 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_100_2_58 & ( ~ (all_100_2_58 = 0) | all_100_0_56 = 0 | all_100_1_57 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  									|
% 23.54/6.25  									| Applying alpha-rule on (212) yields:
% 23.54/6.25  									| (213) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_0_56
% 23.54/6.25  									| (214) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_57
% 23.54/6.25  									| (215) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_100_2_58
% 23.54/6.25  									| (216)  ~ (all_100_2_58 = 0) | all_100_0_56 = 0 | all_100_1_57 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  									|
% 23.54/6.25  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  									|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  									| (217) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  									|
% 23.54/6.25  										| Equations (217) can reduce 114 to:
% 23.54/6.25  										| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.25  										|
% 23.54/6.25  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.25  									|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.25  									| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  									| (220)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.25  									|
% 23.54/6.25  										| Instantiating (220) with all_105_0_59, all_105_1_60, all_105_2_61 yields:
% 23.54/6.25  										| (221) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_105_1_60 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_105_1_60) = all_105_0_59 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_105_2_61 & ( ~ (all_105_0_59 = 0) |  ~ (all_105_2_61 = 0))
% 23.54/6.25  										|
% 23.54/6.25  										| Applying alpha-rule on (221) yields:
% 23.54/6.25  										| (222) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_105_1_60
% 23.54/6.25  										| (223) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_105_1_60) = all_105_0_59
% 23.54/6.25  										| (224) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_105_2_61
% 23.54/6.25  										| (225)  ~ (all_105_0_59 = 0) |  ~ (all_105_2_61 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  										|
% 23.54/6.25  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  										|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  										| (217) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  										|
% 23.54/6.25  											| Equations (217) can reduce 114 to:
% 23.54/6.25  											| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.25  											|
% 23.54/6.25  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.25  										|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.25  										| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  										| (229)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 23.54/6.25  										|
% 23.54/6.25  											| Instantiating (229) with all_114_0_62, all_114_1_63, all_114_2_64 yields:
% 23.54/6.25  											| (230) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_114_1_63 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_114_1_63) = all_114_0_62 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_114_2_64 & ( ~ (all_114_0_62 = 0) |  ~ (all_114_2_64 = 0))
% 23.54/6.25  											|
% 23.54/6.25  											| Applying alpha-rule on (230) yields:
% 23.54/6.25  											| (231) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_114_1_63
% 23.54/6.25  											| (232) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_114_1_63) = all_114_0_62
% 23.54/6.25  											| (233) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_114_2_64
% 23.54/6.25  											| (234)  ~ (all_114_0_62 = 0) |  ~ (all_114_2_64 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  											|
% 23.54/6.25  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.25  											|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.25  											| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.25  											|
% 23.54/6.25  												| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.25  												| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.25  												|
% 23.54/6.25  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.25  											|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.25  											| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.25  											| (238) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  											|
% 23.54/6.26  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  												|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  												| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  												|
% 23.54/6.26  													| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.26  													| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  													|
% 23.54/6.26  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  												|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  												| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  												| (242) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  												|
% 23.54/6.26  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (138), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  													|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  													| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  													|
% 23.54/6.26  														| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.26  														| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  														|
% 23.54/6.26  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  													|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  													| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  													| (246) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  													|
% 23.54/6.26  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (139), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  														|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  														| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  														|
% 23.54/6.26  															| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.26  															| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  															|
% 23.54/6.26  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  														|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  														| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  														| (250) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  														|
% 23.54/6.26  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  															|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  															| (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  															|
% 23.54/6.26  																| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.54/6.26  																| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  																|
% 23.54/6.26  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  															|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  															| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  															| (254)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  															|
% 23.54/6.26  																| Instantiating (254) with all_138_0_68, all_138_1_69, all_138_2_70, all_138_3_71 yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																| (255) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_138_1_69 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_138_0_68 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71 & ( ~ (all_138_2_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_138_3_71 = 0) | all_138_0_68 = 0 | all_138_1_69 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  																|
% 23.54/6.26  																| Applying alpha-rule on (255) yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																| (256) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70
% 23.54/6.26  																| (257)  ~ (all_138_2_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_138_3_71 = 0) | all_138_0_68 = 0 | all_138_1_69 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																| (258) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71
% 23.54/6.26  																| (259) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_138_1_69
% 23.54/6.26  																| (260) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.26  																|
% 23.54/6.26  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  																|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  																| (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																|
% 23.54/6.26  																	| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  																	|
% 23.54/6.26  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  																|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  																| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  																| (264)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  																|
% 23.54/6.26  																	| Instantiating (264) with all_143_0_72, all_143_1_73, all_143_2_74, all_143_3_75 yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (265) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_143_0_72 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_143_1_73 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_3_75 & ( ~ (all_143_2_74 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_3_75 = 0) | all_143_0_72 = 0 | all_143_1_73 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  																	|
% 23.54/6.26  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (265) yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (266) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_143_0_72
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (267)  ~ (all_143_2_74 = 0) |  ~ (all_143_3_75 = 0) | all_143_0_72 = 0 | all_143_1_73 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (268) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_143_3_75
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (269) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_143_1_73
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (270) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74
% 23.54/6.26  																	|
% 23.54/6.26  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  																	|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																	|
% 23.54/6.26  																		| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.26  																		|
% 23.54/6.26  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.26  																	|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  																	| (274)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.26  																	|
% 23.54/6.26  																		| Instantiating (274) with all_148_0_76, all_148_1_77, all_148_2_78, all_148_3_79 yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (275) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_148_1_77 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_148_0_76 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_148_2_78 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_148_3_79 & ( ~ (all_148_2_78 = 0) |  ~ (all_148_3_79 = 0) | all_148_0_76 = 0 | all_148_1_77 = 0)
% 23.54/6.26  																		|
% 23.54/6.26  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (275) yields:
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (276) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_148_2_78
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (277) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_148_3_79
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (278)  ~ (all_148_2_78 = 0) |  ~ (all_148_3_79 = 0) | all_148_0_76 = 0 | all_148_1_77 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (279) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_148_1_77
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (280) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_148_0_76
% 23.54/6.26  																		|
% 23.54/6.26  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.26  																		|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.26  																		| (81) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 23.54/6.26  																		|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Equations (81) can reduce 53 to:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.27  																		|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.27  																		| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 23.54/6.27  																		| (284)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.27  																		|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating (284) with all_153_0_80, all_153_1_81, all_153_2_82, all_153_3_83 yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (285) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_153_0_80 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_153_1_81 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_153_2_82 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_153_3_83 & ( ~ (all_153_2_82 = 0) |  ~ (all_153_3_83 = 0) | all_153_0_80 = 0 | all_153_1_81 = 0)
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (285) yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (286) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_153_1_81
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (287) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_153_0_80
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (288) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_153_3_83
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (289)  ~ (all_153_2_82 = 0) |  ~ (all_153_3_83 = 0) | all_153_0_80 = 0 | all_153_1_81 = 0
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (290) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_153_2_82
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_64_2_33, all_70_2_42 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_42, line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_64_2_33, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (291) all_70_2_42 = all_64_2_33
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_74_2_48, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_74_2_48, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (292) all_74_2_48 = all_1_2_2
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_100_0_56, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_0_56, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (293) all_100_0_56 = 0
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_100_1_57, all_100_0_56 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_0_56, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_100_1_57, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (294) all_100_0_56 = all_100_1_57
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_153_0_80, all_74_1_47 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_153_0_80, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (295) all_153_0_80 = all_74_1_47 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_47)
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_66_1_35, all_153_0_80 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_153_0_80, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (296) all_153_0_80 = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_148_0_76, all_153_1_81 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_153_1_81, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_148_0_76, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (297) all_153_1_81 = all_148_0_76
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_143_1_73, all_33_1_23 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_143_1_73, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_33_1_23, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (298) all_143_1_73 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_143_1_73, all_148_0_76 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_148_0_76, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_143_1_73, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (299) all_148_0_76 = all_143_1_73
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_138_0_68, all_153_1_81 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_153_1_81, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_138_0_68, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (300) all_153_1_81 = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_60_1_26, all_143_1_73 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_143_1_73, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_60_1_26, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (301) all_143_1_73 = all_60_1_26
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_62_1_29, all_16_1_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_62_1_29, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (302) all_62_1_29 = all_16_1_7
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_138_2_70, all_153_2_82 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_153_2_82, distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (303) all_153_2_82 = all_138_2_70
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_143_2_74, all_148_2_78 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_148_2_78, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (304) all_148_2_78 = all_143_2_74
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (305)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_3_3 yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (306)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_70_0_40, all_78_0_52 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_78_0_52, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_40, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (307) all_78_0_52 = all_70_0_40
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_68_0_37, all_78_0_52 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_78_0_52, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_68_0_37, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (308) all_78_0_52 = all_68_0_37
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_138_3_71, all_148_3_79 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_148_3_79, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (309) all_148_3_79 = all_138_3_71
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_105_2_61, all_148_3_79 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_148_3_79, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_105_2_61, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (310) all_148_3_79 = all_105_2_61
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_74_0_46, all_138_3_71 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_74_0_46, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (311) all_138_3_71 = all_74_0_46
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_66_0_34, all_138_3_71 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_66_0_34, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (312) all_138_3_71 = all_66_0_34
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, 0, all_138_3_71 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_138_3_71, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (313) all_138_3_71 = 0
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_68_2_39, all_76_0_49 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_49, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_68_2_39, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (314) all_76_0_49 = all_68_2_39
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_64_0_31, all_76_0_49 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_49, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_64_0_31, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (315) all_76_0_49 = all_64_0_31
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_60_0_25, all_68_2_39 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_68_2_39, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_0_25, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (316) all_68_2_39 = all_60_0_25
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_60_2_27, all_68_2_39 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_68_2_39, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_2_27, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (317) all_68_2_39 = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_153_3_83, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_153_3_83, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (318) all_153_3_83 = 0
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_114_2_64, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_114_2_64, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (319) all_114_2_64 = all_16_0_6
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Using (233) and (54) yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (320)  ~ (all_114_2_64 = 0)
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Combining equations (297,300) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (321) all_148_0_76 = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Simplifying 321 yields:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (322) all_148_0_76 = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.27  																			| Combining equations (299,322) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.27  																			| (323) all_143_1_73 = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.27  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 323 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (324) all_143_1_73 = all_138_0_68
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (309,310) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (325) all_138_3_71 = all_105_2_61
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 325 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (326) all_138_3_71 = all_105_2_61
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (301,324) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (327) all_138_0_68 = all_60_1_26
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (298,324) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (328) all_138_0_68 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (328,327) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (329) all_60_1_26 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (312,326) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (330) all_105_2_61 = all_66_0_34
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (311,326) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (331) all_105_2_61 = all_74_0_46
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (313,326) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (332) all_105_2_61 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (330,331) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (333) all_74_0_46 = all_66_0_34
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (332,331) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (334) all_74_0_46 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (294,293) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (335) all_100_1_57 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 335 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (336) all_100_1_57 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (307,308) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (337) all_70_0_40 = all_68_0_37
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 337 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (338) all_70_0_40 = all_68_0_37
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (314,315) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (339) all_68_2_39 = all_64_0_31
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 339 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (340) all_68_2_39 = all_64_0_31
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (334,333) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (341) all_66_0_34 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (317,340) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (342) all_64_0_31 = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (316,340) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (343) all_64_0_31 = all_60_0_25
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (343,342) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (344) all_60_0_25 = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Simplifying 344 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (345) all_60_0_25 = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (342,340) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (317) all_68_2_39 = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (329,327) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (328) all_138_0_68 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Combining equations (328,300) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (348) all_153_1_81 = all_33_1_23
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| Equations (319) can reduce 320 to:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (114)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (291) and (182) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (350) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (336) and (214) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (50) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (292) and (192) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (352) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_47
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (302) and (161) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (62) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (303) and (290) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (256) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (304) and (276) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (270) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (338) and (183) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (177) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_68_0_37
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (341) and (172) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (206) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			| From (345) and (157) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (158) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_2_27
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.28  																			|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (359)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_47)
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																				| Using (352) and (359) yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (122) $false
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.28  																			|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (352) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_47
% 23.54/6.28  																			| (362) all_153_0_80 = all_74_1_47
% 23.54/6.28  																			|
% 23.54/6.28  																				| Combining equations (362,296) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (363) all_74_1_47 = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																				| Simplifying 363 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (364) all_74_1_47 = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																				| Equations (364) can reduce 207 to:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (365)  ~ (all_66_1_35 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																				| From (364) and (352) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (171) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (140), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.28  																				|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Equations (208) can reduce 126 to:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (82) $false
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.54/6.28  																				|-Branch two:
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (126)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																				| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.28  																				|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Instantiating (370) with all_167_0_84, all_167_1_85, all_167_2_86 yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (371) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_0_84 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_1_85 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_167_2_86 & ( ~ (all_167_2_86 = 0) | all_167_0_84 = 0 | all_167_1_85 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (372) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_0_84
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (373) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_1_85
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (374) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_167_2_86
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (375)  ~ (all_167_2_86 = 0) | all_167_0_84 = 0 | all_167_1_85 = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_167_0_84, all_66_1_35 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_0_84, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (376) all_167_0_84 = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_167_1_85, all_167_0_84 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_0_84, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_167_1_85, yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (377) all_167_0_84 = all_167_1_85
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Using (177) and (306) yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (378)  ~ (all_68_0_37 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| Combining equations (376,377) yields a new equation:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (379) all_167_1_85 = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					| From (379) and (373) follows:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (171) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 23.54/6.28  																					|-Branch one:
% 23.54/6.28  																					| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.54/6.28  																					|
% 23.54/6.28  																						| Instantiating formula (17) with all_68_1_38, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_68_1_38, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																						| (382) all_68_1_38 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 23.54/6.28  																						|
% 23.54/6.28  																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_70_1_41, all_68_1_38, all_64_2_33, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_68_1_38, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																						| (383) all_70_1_41 = 0 | all_68_1_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_64_2_33) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.28  																						|
% 23.54/6.28  																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_72_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.28  																						| (384) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_1_0_0, all_72_1_44, all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (385) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_72_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (386) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_72_1_44, all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (387) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_72_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (388) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_1_0_0, all_72_1_44, all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (389) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_72_1_44, all_70_1_41, all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (390) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_70_1_41, all_72_1_44, all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (391) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_72_1_44, all_70_1_41, all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (392) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_70_1_41, all_72_1_44, all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (393) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_66_1_35, all_70_1_41, all_1_2_2, all_64_2_33, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (394) all_70_1_41 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (28) with all_70_1_41, all_66_1_35, all_1_2_2, all_64_2_33, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_64_2_33) = all_70_1_41, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (395) all_70_1_41 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_66_1_35, all_72_1_44, all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (396) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_72_1_44, all_66_1_35, all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (397) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_66_1_35, all_72_1_44, all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (398) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.54/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (2) with all_16_1_7, all_138_2_70, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70, yields:
% 23.54/6.29  																						| (399) all_138_2_70 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v0)
% 23.54/6.29  																						|
% 23.95/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (23) with all_138_2_70, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70, yields:
% 23.95/6.29  																						| (400) all_138_2_70 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0)
% 23.95/6.29  																						|
% 23.95/6.29  																						| Instantiating formula (2) with all_68_1_38, all_143_2_74, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_68_1_38, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (401) all_143_2_74 = 0 | all_68_1_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v0)
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_138_2_70, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_138_2_70,  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0), yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (402) all_138_2_70 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (23) with all_143_2_74, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_143_2_74, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (403) all_143_2_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0)
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_0_0, all_72_1_44, all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (404) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_72_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (405) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_72_1_44, all_66_1_35, all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (406) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_66_1_35, all_72_1_44, all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = all_72_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_66_1_35, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (407) all_72_1_44 = 0 | all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_60_2_27, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_60_2_27,  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0), yields:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (408) all_60_2_27 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						| Combining equations (408,317) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (409) all_68_2_39 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (396), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																						|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																							| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																							| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																							|
% 23.95/6.30  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																						|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																						| (413) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																						|
% 23.95/6.30  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (406), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																							|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																							| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																							|
% 23.95/6.30  																								| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																								| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																								|
% 23.95/6.30  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																							|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																							| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																							| (417) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																							|
% 23.95/6.30  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (397), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																								|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																								| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																								|
% 23.95/6.30  																									| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																									| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																									|
% 23.95/6.30  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																								|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																								| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																								| (421) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																								|
% 23.95/6.30  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (407), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																									|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																									| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																									|
% 23.95/6.30  																										| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																										| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																										|
% 23.95/6.30  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																									|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																									| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																									| (425) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																									|
% 23.95/6.30  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (398), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																										|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																										| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																										|
% 23.95/6.30  																											| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																											| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																											|
% 23.95/6.30  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																										|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																										| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																										| (429) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																										|
% 23.95/6.30  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (413), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																											|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																											| (430) all_66_1_35 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																											|
% 23.95/6.30  																												| Equations (430) can reduce 365 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																												| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																												|
% 23.95/6.30  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																											|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																											| (365)  ~ (all_66_1_35 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																											| (433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																											|
% 23.95/6.30  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (417), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																												|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																												| (430) all_66_1_35 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																												|
% 23.95/6.30  																													| Equations (430) can reduce 365 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																													| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																													|
% 23.95/6.30  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																												|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																												| (365)  ~ (all_66_1_35 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																												| (437)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																												|
% 23.95/6.30  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (394), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																													|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																													| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																													|
% 23.95/6.30  																														| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																														| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																														|
% 23.95/6.30  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																													|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																													| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																													| (441) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.30  																													|
% 23.95/6.30  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (395), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.30  																														|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.30  																														| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.30  																														|
% 23.95/6.30  																															| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.30  																															| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.30  																															|
% 23.95/6.30  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.30  																														|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.30  																														| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.30  																														| (445) all_66_1_35 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																														|
% 23.95/6.31  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																															|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																															| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																															|
% 23.95/6.31  																																| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																|
% 23.95/6.31  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																															|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																															| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																															| (449) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																															|
% 23.95/6.31  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (387), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																|
% 23.95/6.31  																																	| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																	| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																| (453) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																|
% 23.95/6.31  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																	| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|
% 23.95/6.31  																																		| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																		| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																	| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																	| (457) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																	|
% 23.95/6.31  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (389), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																		| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|
% 23.95/6.31  																																			| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																			| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																		| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																		| (461) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																		|
% 23.95/6.31  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (404), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																			| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|
% 23.95/6.31  																																				| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																			| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																			| (465) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																			|
% 23.95/6.31  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (385), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																				| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|
% 23.95/6.31  																																					| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																					| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																				| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																				| (469) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																				|
% 23.95/6.31  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (405), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																					| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|
% 23.95/6.31  																																						| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																						| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																					| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																					| (473) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																					|
% 23.95/6.31  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (386), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																						| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|
% 23.95/6.31  																																							| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																							| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																						| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																						| (477) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																						|
% 23.95/6.31  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (393), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																							| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|
% 23.95/6.31  																																								| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																								| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																							| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																							| (481) all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																							|
% 23.95/6.31  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (391), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																								| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|
% 23.95/6.31  																																									| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																									| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																								| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																								| (485) all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																								|
% 23.95/6.31  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (390), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																									| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|
% 23.95/6.31  																																										| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																										| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																									| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																									| (489) all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																									|
% 23.95/6.31  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																										| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|
% 23.95/6.31  																																											| Equations (410) can reduce 205 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																											| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																											|
% 23.95/6.31  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																										| (205)  ~ (all_72_1_44 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																										| (493) all_70_1_41 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																										|
% 23.95/6.31  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																											|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																											| (494)  ~ (all_60_1_26 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																											|
% 23.95/6.31  																																												| Equations (329) can reduce 494 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																												| (495)  ~ (all_33_1_23 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																												|
% 23.95/6.31  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																												|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																												| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.31  																																												|
% 23.95/6.31  																																													| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.31  																																													| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.31  																																													|
% 23.95/6.31  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.31  																																												|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.31  																																												| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.31  																																												| (499)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.31  																																												|
% 23.95/6.31  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (485), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.31  																																													|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.31  																																													| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																													|
% 23.95/6.32  																																														| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																														| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																													|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																													| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																													| (503)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.32  																																													|
% 23.95/6.32  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (489), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																														| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|
% 23.95/6.32  																																															| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																															| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																														| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																														| (507)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_64_2_33, all_72_2_45) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.32  																																														|
% 23.95/6.32  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (493), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																															| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																															| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																															| (511)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_72_2_45) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_72_2_45, all_64_2_33) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 23.95/6.32  																																															|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																| (512)  ~ (all_138_2_70 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (400), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	| (513) all_138_2_70 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		| Equations (513) can reduce 512 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	| (512)  ~ (all_138_2_70 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	| (516)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																	|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		| (517)  ~ (all_68_1_38 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (383), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				| Equations (438) can reduce 381 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			| (381)  ~ (all_70_1_41 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			| (521) all_68_1_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_64_2_33) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.32  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				| (522) all_68_1_38 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					| Equations (522) can reduce 517 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				| (517)  ~ (all_68_1_38 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				| (525)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_64_2_33) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_64_2_33) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 23.95/6.32  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					| (526)  ~ (all_148_2_78 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| Equations (304) can reduce 526 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (527)  ~ (all_143_2_74 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (403), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (528) all_143_2_74 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| Equations (528) can reduce 527 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (527)  ~ (all_143_2_74 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (531)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (399), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| (513) all_138_2_70 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								| Equations (513) can reduce 512 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| (512)  ~ (all_138_2_70 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| (535) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (401), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								| (528) all_143_2_74 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									| Equations (528) can reduce 527 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								| (527)  ~ (all_143_2_74 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								| (539) all_68_1_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																								|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									| (522) all_68_1_38 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										| Equations (522) can reduce 517 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									| (517)  ~ (all_68_1_38 = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									| (543)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																									|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (382), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										| (544) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (402), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											| (545)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												| Using (544) and (545) yields:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												| (122) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											| (544) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											| (513) all_138_2_70 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												| Equations (513) can reduce 512 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										| (545)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										| (522) all_68_1_38 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																										|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											| Equations (522) can reduce 517 to:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					| (553) all_148_2_78 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					| (554)  ~ (all_148_3_79 = 0) | all_148_0_76 = 0 | all_148_1_77 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																					|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| Combining equations (553,304) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (528) all_143_2_74 = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| From (528) and (270) follows:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (544) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (402), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						| (545)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 23.95/6.32  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| Using (544) and (545) yields:
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							| (122) $false
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|
% 23.95/6.32  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																						| (544) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																						| (513) all_138_2_70 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																						|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																							| Equations (513) can reduce 512 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																							| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																							|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (522) all_68_1_38 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (563)  ~ (all_68_2_39 = 0) | all_68_0_37 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (564)  ~ (all_68_2_39 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Equations (409) can reduce 564 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (409) all_68_2_39 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (567) all_68_0_37 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Equations (567) can reduce 378 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																| (513) all_138_2_70 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																| (570)  ~ (all_138_3_71 = 0) | all_138_0_68 = 0 | all_138_1_69 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	| Combining equations (513,303) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	| (571) all_153_2_82 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	| (572)  ~ (all_153_2_82 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| Equations (571) can reduce 572 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	| (571) all_153_2_82 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	| (575)  ~ (all_153_3_83 = 0) | all_153_0_80 = 0 | all_153_1_81 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																	|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (576)  ~ (all_153_3_83 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| Equations (318) can reduce 576 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (318) all_153_3_83 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		| (579) all_153_0_80 = 0 | all_153_1_81 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																		|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (579), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (580) all_153_0_80 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Combining equations (580,296) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (430) all_66_1_35 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Equations (430) can reduce 365 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (583)  ~ (all_153_0_80 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			| (584) all_153_1_81 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																			|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Combining equations (584,348) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (585) all_33_1_23 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| Equations (585) can reduce 495 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|
% 23.95/6.33  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																											|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																											| (587) all_60_1_26 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																											| (588)  ~ (all_60_2_27 = 0) | (all_60_0_25 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																											|
% 23.95/6.33  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (588), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.33  																																												|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.33  																																												| (589)  ~ (all_60_2_27 = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  																																												|
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| Equations (408) can reduce 589 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																													|
% 23.95/6.33  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																																												|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																																												| (408) all_60_2_27 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																												| (592) all_60_0_25 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																												|
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (592) yields:
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| (593) all_60_0_25 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| (217) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																																													|
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| Equations (217) can reduce 114 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																																													| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																																													|
% 23.95/6.33  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  																					|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  																					| (438) all_70_1_41 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																					| (597) all_70_0_40 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																					|
% 23.95/6.33  																						| Combining equations (338,597) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.33  																						| (598) all_68_0_37 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																						|
% 23.95/6.33  																						| Simplifying 598 yields:
% 23.95/6.33  																						| (567) all_68_0_37 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  																						|
% 23.95/6.33  																						| Equations (567) can reduce 378 to:
% 23.95/6.33  																						| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  																						|
% 23.95/6.33  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  							|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  							| (601) all_74_1_47 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  							| (602) all_74_0_46 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  							|
% 23.95/6.33  								| Applying alpha-rule on (602) yields:
% 23.95/6.33  								| (334) all_74_0_46 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  								| (604) all_28_3_21 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  								|
% 23.95/6.33  								| Equations (604) can reduce 135 to:
% 23.95/6.33  								| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  								|
% 23.95/6.33  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  						|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  						| (606)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 23.95/6.33  						| (217) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  						|
% 23.95/6.33  							| Equations (217) can reduce 114 to:
% 23.95/6.33  							| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  							|
% 23.95/6.33  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  					|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  					| (410) all_72_1_44 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  					| (610) all_72_0_43 = 0 & all_28_3_21 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  					|
% 23.95/6.33  						| Applying alpha-rule on (610) yields:
% 23.95/6.33  						| (611) all_72_0_43 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  						| (604) all_28_3_21 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  						|
% 23.95/6.33  						| Equations (604) can reduce 135 to:
% 23.95/6.33  						| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.33  						|
% 23.95/6.33  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.33  			|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.33  			| (208) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  			| (615)  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.33  			|
% 23.95/6.33  				| Combining equations (208,124) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.34  				| (616) all_18_1_10 = 0
% 23.95/6.34  				|
% 23.95/6.34  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (70), into two cases.
% 23.95/6.34  				|-Branch one:
% 23.95/6.34  				| (617)  ~ (all_18_1_10 = 0)
% 23.95/6.34  				|
% 23.95/6.34  					| Equations (616) can reduce 617 to:
% 23.95/6.34  					| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.34  					|
% 23.95/6.34  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.34  				|-Branch two:
% 23.95/6.34  				| (616) all_18_1_10 = 0
% 23.95/6.34  				| (620) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 23.95/6.34  				|
% 23.95/6.34  					| Combining equations (109,620) yields a new equation:
% 23.95/6.34  					| (621) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.34  					|
% 23.95/6.34  					| Simplifying 621 yields:
% 23.95/6.34  					| (217) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 23.95/6.34  					|
% 23.95/6.34  					| Equations (217) can reduce 114 to:
% 23.95/6.34  					| (82) $false
% 23.95/6.34  					|
% 23.95/6.34  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 23.95/6.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 23.95/6.34  
% 23.95/6.34  5707ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------