TSTP Solution File: GEO181+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.91s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : GEO181+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:50:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.91/1.11  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.91/1.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.91/1.11  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.91/1.11  SPASS derived 2190 clauses, backtracked 351 clauses, performed 6 splits and kept 1124 clauses.
% 0.91/1.11  SPASS allocated 86708 KBytes.
% 0.91/1.11  SPASS spent	0:00:00.74 on the problem.
% 0.91/1.11  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.91/1.11  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.91/1.11  		0:00:00.05 for inferences.
% 0.91/1.11  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.91/1.11  		0:00:00.61 for the reduction.
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  
% 0.91/1.11  Here is a proof with depth 9, length 65 :
% 0.91/1.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.91/1.11  1[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,skc4)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,u)* -> .
% 0.91/1.11  3[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,u)* -> .
% 0.91/1.11  5[0:Inp] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.91/1.11  6[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))* -> .
% 0.91/1.11  8[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v)*+ -> distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  9[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,v)*+ -> distinct_lines(v,w)* distinct_lines(u,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  11[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> apart_point_and_line(w,v)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  12[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> distinct_lines(v,w)* apart_point_and_line(u,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  13[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,u).
% 0.91/1.11  14[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,v).
% 0.91/1.11  17[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,v)*+ distinct_points(w,x)* -> apart_point_and_line(x,u)* apart_point_and_line(x,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  18[0:Res:1.0,17.0] || distinct_lines(u,v)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc3,v) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u).
% 0.91/1.11  19[0:Res:1.0,8.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc4,u) distinct_points(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  20[0:Res:1.0,13.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* -> distinct_points(u,skc3).
% 0.91/1.11  24[0:Res:5.0,11.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(skc5,u).
% 0.91/1.11  25[0:Res:5.0,12.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc4),u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  33[0:Res:17.5,6.0] || distinct_points(u,skc4) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc5),v)*+ -> apart_point_and_line(u,v)* apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))* apart_point_and_line(skc4,v).
% 0.91/1.11  37[0:Res:1.0,33.0] || distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc5),u)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc5)).
% 0.91/1.11  41[1:Spt:37.0,37.1,37.2] || distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc5),u)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u).
% 0.91/1.11  55[0:Res:24.0,20.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.91/1.11  58[0:Res:25.1,9.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) distinct_lines(u,v)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc4),v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  66[0:Res:19.1,8.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc4,u)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc3,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  67[0:Res:55.0,8.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc3)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc5,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  74[0:Res:24.0,11.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  91[0:Res:66.2,2.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc4,u)* distinct_points(u,skc3)*.
% 0.91/1.11  93[0:Res:91.0,8.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc3)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc4,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  105[0:Res:67.2,2.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc3)* distinct_points(u,skc5).
% 0.91/1.11  110[0:Res:105.0,2.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc3,skc5)*.
% 0.91/1.11  137[0:Res:93.2,2.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc3)* distinct_points(u,skc4).
% 0.91/1.11  143[0:Res:137.0,8.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(skc3,v)* distinct_points(u,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  182[0:Res:143.2,2.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  231[0:Res:74.0,8.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(v,u)* distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(skc5,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  251[0:Res:58.1,18.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc4),v)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc3,v) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  940[0:Res:231.1,2.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc5,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  959[0:Res:940.2,8.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(skc5,w)*.
% 0.91/1.11  1617[0:Fac:959.2,959.3] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,skc5) distinct_points(skc5,v)*.
% 0.91/1.11  1640[2:Spt:1617.2] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  1641[2:UnC:1640.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  1642[2:Spt:1641.0,1617.0,1617.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(u,skc5).
% 0.91/1.11  2475[3:Spt:251.1,251.3,251.4] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc3,skc4),u)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u).
% 0.91/1.11  2481[3:Res:2475.0,3.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4)) apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2487[4:Spt:2481.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2493[4:Res:2487.0,14.1] || distinct_points(skc3,skc4)* -> distinct_points(skc4,skc4).
% 0.91/1.11  2497[4:MRR:2493.0,2493.1,182.1,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  2498[4:Spt:2497.0,2481.0,2487.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* -> .
% 0.91/1.11  2499[4:Spt:2497.0,2481.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2547[4:Res:2499.0,13.1] || distinct_points(skc3,skc4) -> distinct_points(skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2552[4:MRR:2547.0,2547.1,182.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  2553[3:Spt:2552.0,251.0,251.2,251.5] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2559[3:Res:2553.2,12.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) distinct_lines(u,v)* apart_point_and_line(skc3,v).
% 0.91/1.11  2566[3:Res:2559.2,41.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))* apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2572[3:Obv:2566.2] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2573[3:MRR:2572.1,6.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))* apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2578[4:Spt:2573.1,2573.2] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2579[4:Res:2578.1,20.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))* distinct_points(skc3,skc3).
% 0.91/1.11  2586[4:MRR:2579.1,2.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc3,skc4))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2592[4:Res:2586.0,14.1] || distinct_points(skc3,skc4)* -> distinct_points(skc4,skc4).
% 0.91/1.11  2596[4:MRR:2592.0,2592.1,182.1,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  2597[4:Spt:2596.0,2573.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2600[4:Res:2597.0,14.1] || distinct_points(skc3,skc5)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.91/1.11  2603[4:MRR:2600.0,2600.1,110.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  2604[1:Spt:2603.0,37.3] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc3,skc5))*.
% 0.91/1.11  2606[1:Res:2604.0,13.1] || distinct_points(skc3,skc5) -> distinct_points(skc3,skc3)*.
% 0.91/1.11  2610[1:MRR:2606.0,2606.1,110.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.91/1.11  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.91/1.11  Formulae used in the proof : con apart1 apart2 apart4 apart5 ceq1 ceq2 con1 cu1
% 0.91/1.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------