TSTP Solution File: GEO180+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO180+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.44s 3.90s
% Output   : Proof 32.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO180+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:20:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.20/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.20/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.20/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.20/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.20/0.58  
% 0.20/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.20/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.20/0.58  
% 0.20/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.20/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.20/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.20/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.20/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.20/0.59  
% 0.20/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.74/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.68/0.94  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.90/1.07  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.05/1.09  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.80/1.31  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.80/1.31  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.80/1.33  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.05/1.42  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.35/1.48  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.35/1.48  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.46/1.50  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.67/1.60  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.02/1.61  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.39/1.74  Prover 2: gave up
% 4.39/1.74  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.39/1.76  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.39/1.78  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.83/1.78  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.06/1.84  Prover 3: gave up
% 5.06/1.84  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 5.06/1.85  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.49/1.92  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.49/1.93  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.00/3.05  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.00/3.09  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 10.37/3.17  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.44/3.90  Prover 5: proved (847ms)
% 13.44/3.90  Prover 4: stopped
% 13.44/3.90  
% 13.44/3.90  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 13.44/3.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 13.44/3.90  
% 13.44/3.90  Generating proof ... found it (size 779)
% 31.63/9.44  
% 31.63/9.44  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 31.63/9.44  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 31.63/9.44  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v1) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 31.95/9.49  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 31.95/9.49  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 31.95/9.50  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.95/9.50  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.95/9.50  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 31.95/9.50  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 31.95/9.50  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 31.95/9.50  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.95/9.50  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 31.95/9.50  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.95/9.50  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.95/9.50  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 31.95/9.50  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.51  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 32.08/9.51  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 32.08/9.51  | (22)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v1) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 32.08/9.51  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 32.08/9.51  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 32.08/9.51  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 32.08/9.51  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 32.08/9.51  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 32.08/9.51  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.51  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.51  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 32.08/9.51  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.51  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 32.08/9.51  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 32.08/9.51  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 32.08/9.51  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 32.08/9.51  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 32.08/9.51  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 32.08/9.51  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0))
% 32.08/9.52  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 32.08/9.52  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 32.08/9.52  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 32.08/9.52  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.52  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 32.08/9.52  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 32.08/9.52  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 32.08/9.52  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating (22) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (47)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0) & line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1 & line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Applying alpha-rule on (47) yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (48) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 32.08/9.52  | (49) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1
% 32.08/9.52  | (50) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 32.08/9.52  | (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0
% 32.08/9.52  | (52) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.08/9.52  | (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (54)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating formula (19) with 0, 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (55)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (57) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.08/9.52  |
% 32.08/9.52  | Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.08/9.52  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.52  |
% 32.17/9.52  | Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.52  | (59)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (60)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (61) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating (60) with all_16_0_6, all_16_1_7, all_16_2_8 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (62) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6 & ( ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Applying alpha-rule on (62) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (63) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.53  | (64) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8
% 32.17/9.53  | (65) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 32.17/9.53  | (66)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0) |  ~ (all_16_2_8 = 0) | all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating (56) with all_18_0_9, all_18_1_10, all_18_2_11 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (67) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_18_0_9 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_10 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11 & ( ~ (all_18_2_11 = 0) | (all_18_0_9 = 0 & all_18_1_10 = 0))
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Applying alpha-rule on (67) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (68) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_18_0_9
% 32.17/9.53  | (69) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_18_1_10
% 32.17/9.53  | (70) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11
% 32.17/9.53  | (71)  ~ (all_18_2_11 = 0) | (all_18_0_9 = 0 & all_18_1_10 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating (59) with all_20_0_12, all_20_1_13, all_20_2_14 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (72) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_20_1_13 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12 & ( ~ (all_20_1_13 = 0) |  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | all_20_0_12 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Applying alpha-rule on (72) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (73) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_20_1_13
% 32.17/9.53  | (74) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14
% 32.17/9.53  | (75) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12
% 32.17/9.53  | (76)  ~ (all_20_1_13 = 0) |  ~ (all_20_2_14 = 0) | all_20_0_12 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating (58) with all_22_0_15, all_22_1_16, all_22_2_17 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (77) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_22_2_17 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_22_2_17) = all_22_1_16 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_22_0_15 & ( ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (78) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_22_2_17
% 32.17/9.53  | (79) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_22_2_17) = all_22_1_16
% 32.17/9.53  | (80) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_22_0_15
% 32.17/9.53  | (81)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0) | all_22_0_15 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Instantiating (55) with all_24_0_18, all_24_1_19, all_24_2_20 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (82) intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_1_19 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_2_20 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_24_1_19) = all_24_0_18 & ( ~ (all_24_2_20 = 0) | all_24_0_18 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  | Applying alpha-rule on (82) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  | (83) intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_1_19
% 32.17/9.53  | (84) convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_2_20
% 32.17/9.53  | (85) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_24_1_19) = all_24_0_18
% 32.17/9.53  | (86)  ~ (all_24_2_20 = 0) | all_24_0_18 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (57), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.53  |-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.53  | (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  	| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.53  	| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.53  	|
% 32.17/9.53  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.53  |-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.53  | (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  | (90)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.53  |
% 32.17/9.53  	| Instantiating (90) with all_30_0_21, all_30_1_22, all_30_2_23, all_30_3_24 yields:
% 32.17/9.53  	| (91) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_0_21 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_1_22 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_30_2_23 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_30_3_24 & ( ~ (all_30_2_23 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_3_24 = 0) | all_30_0_21 = 0 | all_30_1_22 = 0)
% 32.17/9.53  	|
% 32.17/9.53  	| Applying alpha-rule on (91) yields:
% 32.17/9.53  	| (92) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_1_22
% 32.17/9.53  	| (93) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_30_3_24
% 32.17/9.53  	| (94)  ~ (all_30_2_23 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_3_24 = 0) | all_30_0_21 = 0 | all_30_1_22 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  	| (95) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_0_21
% 32.17/9.53  	| (96) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = all_30_2_23
% 32.17/9.53  	|
% 32.17/9.53  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (61), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.53  	|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.53  	| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.53  	|
% 32.17/9.53  		| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.53  		| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.53  		|
% 32.17/9.53  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.53  	|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.53  	| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.54  	| (100)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.54  	|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_22_2_17, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_22_2_17, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (101) all_22_2_17 = all_1_2_2
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_30_0_21, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_0_21, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (102) all_30_0_21 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_30_1_22, all_30_0_21 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_0_21, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_1_22, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (103) all_30_0_21 = all_30_1_22
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_20_1_13, all_30_1_22 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_30_1_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_20_1_13, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (104) all_30_1_22 = all_20_1_13
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_16_1_7, all_22_1_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (105) all_22_1_16 = all_16_1_7 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16)
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_18_0_9, all_20_2_14 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_2_14, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_18_0_9, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (106) all_20_2_14 = all_18_0_9
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_2_11, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (107) all_18_2_11 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_16_2_8, all_18_2_11 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_18_2_11, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_2_8, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (108) all_18_2_11 = all_16_2_8
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_22_0_15, all_30_3_24 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_30_3_24, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_22_0_15, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (109) all_30_3_24 = all_22_0_15
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Using (80) and (54) yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (110)  ~ (all_22_0_15 = 0)
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_16_0_6, all_30_3_24 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_30_3_24, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (111) all_30_3_24 = all_16_0_6
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Combining equations (103,102) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (112) all_30_1_22 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Simplifying 112 yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (113) all_30_1_22 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Combining equations (113,104) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (114) all_20_1_13 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Combining equations (109,111) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (115) all_22_0_15 = all_16_0_6
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Simplifying 115 yields:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (116) all_22_0_15 = all_16_0_6
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Combining equations (107,108) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (117) all_16_2_8 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Combining equations (117,108) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (107) all_18_2_11 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| Equations (116) can reduce 110 to:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (119)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (101) and (78) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (48) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (101) and (79) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (121) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (114) and (73) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (106) and (74) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (68) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_18_0_9
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (117) and (64) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (52) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		| From (116) and (80) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (65) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (81), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.54  		|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.54  		| (126)  ~ (all_22_1_16 = 0)
% 32.17/9.54  		|
% 32.17/9.54  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (71), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.54  			|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.54  			| (127)  ~ (all_18_2_11 = 0)
% 32.17/9.54  			|
% 32.17/9.54  				| Equations (107) can reduce 127 to:
% 32.17/9.54  				| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.54  				|
% 32.17/9.54  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.54  			|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.54  			| (107) all_18_2_11 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  			| (130) all_18_0_9 = 0 & all_18_1_10 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  			|
% 32.17/9.54  				| Applying alpha-rule on (130) yields:
% 32.17/9.54  				| (131) all_18_0_9 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  				| (132) all_18_1_10 = 0
% 32.17/9.54  				|
% 32.17/9.54  				| From (131) and (68) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  				| (133) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.17/9.54  				|
% 32.17/9.54  				| From (132) and (69) follows:
% 32.17/9.54  				| (134) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.17/9.54  				|
% 32.17/9.54  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (105), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.54  				|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.54  				| (135)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16)
% 32.17/9.55  				|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Using (121) and (135) yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (136) $false
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.55  				|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.55  				| (121) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_22_1_16
% 32.17/9.55  				| (138) all_22_1_16 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.55  				|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Equations (138) can reduce 126 to:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| From (138) and (121) follows:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (63) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_4_4 yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (141)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (42) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (142) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (143) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (144) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (145) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (146) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (147) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (42) with all_16_1_7, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (148) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (34) with all_24_1_19, all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_1_19, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (149)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_24_1_19) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0))))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (150)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (151)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (152)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (7) with all_1_0_0, all_16_1_7, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.55  					| (153) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.55  					|
% 32.17/9.55  					| Instantiating formula (7) with all_16_1_7, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (154) all_16_1_7 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_20_0_12, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (155) all_20_0_12 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (37) with all_20_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (156)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_20_0_12 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (157)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (37) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (158)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (3) with all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (159) all_16_0_6 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_16_0_6, 0, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (160) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (39) with all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (161)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (37) with all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (162)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_16_0_6, all_20_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (163)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))) | (all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_20_0_12, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (164)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))) | (all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating formula (38) with all_16_0_6, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (165) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating (161) with all_70_0_28, all_70_1_29, all_70_2_30 yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (166) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_30 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_28 & ( ~ (all_70_1_29 = 0) | (all_70_0_28 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Applying alpha-rule on (166) yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (167) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.56  					| (168) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29
% 32.17/9.56  					| (169) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_28
% 32.17/9.56  					| (170)  ~ (all_70_1_29 = 0) | (all_70_0_28 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating (151) with all_72_0_31, all_72_1_32, all_72_2_33 yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (171) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_31 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_72_2_33 & ( ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0) |  ~ (all_72_2_33 = 0) | all_72_0_31 = 0)
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Applying alpha-rule on (171) yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (172) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32
% 32.17/9.56  					| (173) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_31
% 32.17/9.56  					| (174) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_72_2_33
% 32.17/9.56  					| (175)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0) |  ~ (all_72_2_33 = 0) | all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Instantiating (149) with all_74_0_34, all_74_1_35, all_74_2_36 yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (176) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_35 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_74_2_36 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_24_1_19) = all_74_0_34 & ( ~ (all_74_2_36 = 0) | all_74_0_34 = 0 | ( ~ (all_74_1_35 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.56  					|
% 32.17/9.56  					| Applying alpha-rule on (176) yields:
% 32.17/9.56  					| (177) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.56  					| (178) convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_74_2_36
% 32.17/9.56  					| (179) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_24_1_19) = all_74_0_34
% 32.17/9.57  					| (180)  ~ (all_74_2_36 = 0) | all_74_0_34 = 0 | ( ~ (all_74_1_35 = 0) &  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0))
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Instantiating (150) with all_76_0_37, all_76_1_38, all_76_2_39 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (181) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_76_2_39 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_76_2_39) = all_76_1_38 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_37 & ( ~ (all_76_1_38 = 0) | all_76_0_37 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Applying alpha-rule on (181) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (182) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_76_2_39
% 32.17/9.57  					| (183) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_76_2_39) = all_76_1_38
% 32.17/9.57  					| (184) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_37
% 32.17/9.57  					| (185)  ~ (all_76_1_38 = 0) | all_76_0_37 = 0
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Instantiating (156) with all_78_0_40, all_78_1_41, all_78_2_42 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (186) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_78_2_42 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_78_1_41 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_78_0_40 & ( ~ (all_78_1_41 = 0) | (all_78_0_40 = 0 & all_20_0_12 = 0))
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Applying alpha-rule on (186) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (187) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_78_2_42
% 32.17/9.57  					| (188) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_78_1_41
% 32.17/9.57  					| (189) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_78_0_40
% 32.17/9.57  					| (190)  ~ (all_78_1_41 = 0) | (all_78_0_40 = 0 & all_20_0_12 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Instantiating (152) with all_80_0_43, all_80_1_44, all_80_2_45 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (191) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_80_2_45 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_80_2_45) = all_80_1_44 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_80_0_43 & ( ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0) | all_80_0_43 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					| Applying alpha-rule on (191) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (192) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_80_2_45
% 32.17/9.57  					| (193) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_80_2_45) = all_80_1_44
% 32.17/9.57  					| (194) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_80_0_43
% 32.17/9.57  					| (195)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0) | all_80_0_43 = 0
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  					|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  					| (196) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.17/9.57  					|
% 32.17/9.57  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  						|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  						| (197)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.57  						|
% 32.17/9.57  							| Instantiating (197) with all_88_0_46, all_88_1_47, all_88_2_48 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  							| (198) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_1_47 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_88_1_47) = all_88_0_46 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_2_48 & ( ~ (all_88_0_46 = 0) |  ~ (all_88_2_48 = 0))
% 32.17/9.57  							|
% 32.17/9.57  							| Applying alpha-rule on (198) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  							| (199) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_1_47
% 32.17/9.57  							| (200) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_88_1_47) = all_88_0_46
% 32.17/9.57  							| (201) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_2_48
% 32.17/9.57  							| (202)  ~ (all_88_0_46 = 0) |  ~ (all_88_2_48 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  							|
% 32.17/9.57  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  							|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  							| (203)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.57  							|
% 32.17/9.57  								| Instantiating (203) with all_92_0_49, all_92_1_50, all_92_2_51 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  								| (204) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_1_50 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_92_0_49 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_2_51 & ( ~ (all_92_0_49 = 0) |  ~ (all_92_2_51 = 0))
% 32.17/9.57  								|
% 32.17/9.57  								| Applying alpha-rule on (204) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  								| (205) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_1_50
% 32.17/9.57  								| (206) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_92_0_49
% 32.17/9.57  								| (207) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_2_51
% 32.17/9.57  								| (208)  ~ (all_92_0_49 = 0) |  ~ (all_92_2_51 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  								|
% 32.17/9.57  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  								|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  								| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.17/9.57  								|
% 32.17/9.57  									| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.17/9.57  									| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.57  									|
% 32.17/9.57  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.57  								|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.57  								| (119)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  								| (212)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.57  								|
% 32.17/9.57  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  									|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  									| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.17/9.57  									|
% 32.17/9.57  										| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.17/9.57  										| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.57  										|
% 32.17/9.57  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.57  									|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.57  									| (119)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  									| (216)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v1) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 32.17/9.57  									|
% 32.17/9.57  										| Instantiating (216) with all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_106_2_57 yields:
% 32.17/9.57  										| (217) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_1_56 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_2_57 & ( ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0) |  ~ (all_106_2_57 = 0))
% 32.17/9.57  										|
% 32.17/9.57  										| Applying alpha-rule on (217) yields:
% 32.17/9.57  										| (218) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_1_56
% 32.17/9.57  										| (219) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55
% 32.17/9.57  										| (220) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_2_57
% 32.17/9.57  										| (221)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0) |  ~ (all_106_2_57 = 0)
% 32.17/9.57  										|
% 32.17/9.57  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.57  										|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.57  										| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.57  										|
% 32.17/9.57  											| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.57  											| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.57  											|
% 32.17/9.57  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.57  										|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.57  										| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  										| (225)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  										|
% 32.17/9.58  											| Instantiating (225) with all_111_0_58, all_111_1_59, all_111_2_60 yields:
% 32.17/9.58  											| (226) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_0_58 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_111_2_60 & ( ~ (all_111_2_60 = 0) | all_111_0_58 = 0 | all_111_1_59 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  											|
% 32.17/9.58  											| Applying alpha-rule on (226) yields:
% 32.17/9.58  											| (227) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_0_58
% 32.17/9.58  											| (228) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.58  											| (229) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_111_2_60
% 32.17/9.58  											| (230)  ~ (all_111_2_60 = 0) | all_111_0_58 = 0 | all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  											|
% 32.17/9.58  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  											|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  											| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  											|
% 32.17/9.58  												| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  												| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  												|
% 32.17/9.58  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  											|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  											| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  											| (234) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  											|
% 32.17/9.58  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (143), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  												|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  												| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  												|
% 32.17/9.58  													| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  													| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  													|
% 32.17/9.58  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  												|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  												| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  												| (238) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  												|
% 32.17/9.58  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (144), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  													|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  													| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  													|
% 32.17/9.58  														| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  														| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  														|
% 32.17/9.58  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  													|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  													| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  													| (242) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  													|
% 32.17/9.58  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  														|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  														| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  														|
% 32.17/9.58  															| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  															| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  															|
% 32.17/9.58  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  														|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  														| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  														| (246) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  														|
% 32.17/9.58  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (145), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  															|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  															| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  															|
% 32.17/9.58  																| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  																| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  																|
% 32.17/9.58  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  															|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  															| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  															| (250) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  															|
% 32.17/9.58  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (146), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  																|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  																| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  																|
% 32.17/9.58  																	| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  																	| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  																	|
% 32.17/9.58  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  																|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  																| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  																| (254) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  																|
% 32.17/9.58  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  																	|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  																	| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  																	|
% 32.17/9.58  																		| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  																		| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  																		|
% 32.17/9.58  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  																	|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  																	| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  																	| (258) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.58  																	|
% 32.17/9.58  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.58  																		|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.58  																		| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.17/9.58  																		|
% 32.17/9.58  																			| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.17/9.58  																			| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.58  																			|
% 32.17/9.58  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.58  																		|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.58  																		| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.17/9.58  																		| (262) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																		|
% 32.17/9.59  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.59  																			|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.59  																			| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																			|
% 32.17/9.59  																				| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.59  																				|
% 32.17/9.59  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.59  																			|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.59  																			| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																			| (266)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																			|
% 32.17/9.59  																				| Instantiating (266) with all_146_0_62, all_146_1_63, all_146_2_64 yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (267) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_146_0_62 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_146_1_63 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_146_2_64 & ( ~ (all_146_2_64 = 0) | all_146_0_62 = 0 | all_146_1_63 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																				|
% 32.17/9.59  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (267) yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (268) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_146_0_62
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (269) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_146_1_63
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (270) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_146_2_64
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (271)  ~ (all_146_2_64 = 0) | all_146_0_62 = 0 | all_146_1_63 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																				|
% 32.17/9.59  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.59  																				|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																				|
% 32.17/9.59  																					| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.59  																					|
% 32.17/9.59  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.59  																				|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																				| (275)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																				|
% 32.17/9.59  																					| Instantiating (275) with all_151_0_65, all_151_1_66, all_151_2_67 yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (276) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_151_0_65 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_151_1_66 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_151_2_67 & ( ~ (all_151_2_67 = 0) | all_151_0_65 = 0 | all_151_1_66 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																					|
% 32.17/9.59  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (276) yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (277) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_151_0_65
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (278) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_151_1_66
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (279) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_151_2_67
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (280)  ~ (all_151_2_67 = 0) | all_151_0_65 = 0 | all_151_1_66 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																					|
% 32.17/9.59  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.59  																					|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																					|
% 32.17/9.59  																						| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.59  																						|
% 32.17/9.59  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.59  																					|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																					| (284)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																					|
% 32.17/9.59  																						| Instantiating (284) with all_156_0_68, all_156_1_69, all_156_2_70, all_156_3_71 yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (285) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_156_0_68 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_156_1_69 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_156_2_70 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_156_3_71 & ( ~ (all_156_2_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_156_3_71 = 0) | all_156_0_68 = 0 | all_156_1_69 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																						|
% 32.17/9.59  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (285) yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (286)  ~ (all_156_2_70 = 0) |  ~ (all_156_3_71 = 0) | all_156_0_68 = 0 | all_156_1_69 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (287) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_156_2_70
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (288) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_156_1_69
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (289) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_156_3_71
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (290) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.59  																						|
% 32.17/9.59  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (246), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.59  																						|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																						|
% 32.17/9.59  																							| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.59  																							|
% 32.17/9.59  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.59  																						|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																						| (294)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																						|
% 32.17/9.59  																							| Instantiating (294) with all_161_0_72, all_161_1_73, all_161_2_74 yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (295) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_161_1_73 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_161_0_72 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_161_2_74 & ( ~ (all_161_2_74 = 0) | all_161_0_72 = 0 | all_161_1_73 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																							|
% 32.17/9.59  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (295) yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (296) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_161_1_73
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (297) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_161_0_72
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (298) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_161_2_74
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (299)  ~ (all_161_2_74 = 0) | all_161_0_72 = 0 | all_161_1_73 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																							|
% 32.17/9.59  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.59  																							|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																							|
% 32.17/9.59  																								| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.59  																								| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.59  																								|
% 32.17/9.59  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.59  																							|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																							| (303)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.59  																							|
% 32.17/9.59  																								| Instantiating (303) with all_166_0_75, all_166_1_76, all_166_2_77, all_166_3_78 yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																								| (304) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_166_1_76 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_166_0_75 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_166_2_77 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_166_3_78 & ( ~ (all_166_2_77 = 0) |  ~ (all_166_3_78 = 0) | all_166_0_75 = 0 | all_166_1_76 = 0)
% 32.17/9.59  																								|
% 32.17/9.59  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (304) yields:
% 32.17/9.59  																								| (305)  ~ (all_166_2_77 = 0) |  ~ (all_166_3_78 = 0) | all_166_0_75 = 0 | all_166_1_76 = 0
% 32.17/9.59  																								| (306) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_166_3_78
% 32.17/9.59  																								| (307) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_166_1_76
% 32.17/9.60  																								| (308) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_166_0_75
% 32.17/9.60  																								| (309) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_166_2_77
% 32.17/9.60  																								|
% 32.17/9.60  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.60  																								|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.60  																								| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																								|
% 32.17/9.60  																									| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.60  																									|
% 32.17/9.60  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.60  																								|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.60  																								| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																								| (313)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.60  																								|
% 32.17/9.60  																									| Instantiating (313) with all_171_0_79, all_171_1_80, all_171_2_81, all_171_3_82 yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (314) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_171_0_79 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_171_1_80 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_171_2_81 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_171_3_82 & ( ~ (all_171_2_81 = 0) |  ~ (all_171_3_82 = 0) | all_171_0_79 = 0 | all_171_1_80 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																									|
% 32.17/9.60  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (314) yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (315) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_171_1_80
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (316) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_171_3_82
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (317) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_171_2_81
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (318)  ~ (all_171_2_81 = 0) |  ~ (all_171_3_82 = 0) | all_171_0_79 = 0 | all_171_1_80 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (319) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_171_0_79
% 32.17/9.60  																									|
% 32.17/9.60  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.60  																									|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																									|
% 32.17/9.60  																										| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.60  																										|
% 32.17/9.60  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.60  																									|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																									| (323)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.17/9.60  																									|
% 32.17/9.60  																										| Instantiating (323) with all_176_0_83, all_176_1_84, all_176_2_85 yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (324) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_176_1_84 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_176_0_83 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_176_2_85 & ( ~ (all_176_2_85 = 0) | all_176_0_83 = 0 | all_176_1_84 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																										|
% 32.17/9.60  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (324) yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (325) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_176_1_84
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (326) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_176_0_83
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (327) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_176_2_85
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (328)  ~ (all_176_2_85 = 0) | all_176_0_83 = 0 | all_176_1_84 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																										|
% 32.17/9.60  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.60  																										|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																										|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (88) $false
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.60  																										|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																										| (332)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.17/9.60  																										|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating (332) with all_181_0_86, all_181_1_87, all_181_2_88, all_181_3_89 yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (333) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_181_1_87 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_181_0_86 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_181_2_88 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_181_3_89 & ( ~ (all_181_2_88 = 0) |  ~ (all_181_3_89 = 0) | all_181_0_86 = 0 | all_181_1_87 = 0)
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (333) yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (334) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_181_3_89
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (335) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_181_2_88
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (336) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_181_0_86
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (337) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_181_1_87
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (338)  ~ (all_181_2_88 = 0) |  ~ (all_181_3_89 = 0) | all_181_0_86 = 0 | all_181_1_87 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_76_2_39, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_76_2_39, line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (339) all_76_2_39 = all_1_1_1
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_80_2_45, all_88_1_47 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_1_47, line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_80_2_45, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (340) all_88_1_47 = all_80_2_45
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42, all_80_2_45 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_80_2_45, line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_78_2_42, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (341) all_80_2_45 = all_78_2_42
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30, all_88_1_47 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_1_47, line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_70_2_30, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (342) all_88_1_47 = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_72_1_32, all_76_1_38 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (343) all_76_1_38 = all_72_1_32 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_76_1_38)
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_161_0_72, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_161_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (344) all_161_0_72 = 0
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_146_1_63, all_161_0_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_161_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = all_146_1_63, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (345) all_161_0_72 = all_146_1_63
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1, all_151_0_65, all_176_1_84 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_176_1_84, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_151_0_65, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (346) all_176_1_84 = all_151_0_65
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_151_1_66, all_176_0_83 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_176_0_83, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_151_1_66, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (347) all_176_0_83 = all_151_1_66
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_111_0_58, all_151_1_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_151_1_66, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_0_58, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (348) all_151_1_66 = all_111_0_58
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_111_1_59, all_176_0_83 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_176_0_83, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (349) all_176_0_83 = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42, all_78_1_41, all_88_0_46 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_78_1_41, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (350) all_88_0_46 = all_78_1_41 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_88_0_46)
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30, all_70_1_29, all_78_1_41 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (351) all_78_1_41 = all_70_1_29 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_78_1_41)
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_171_0_79, all_181_1_87 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_181_1_87, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_171_0_79, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (352) all_181_1_87 = all_171_0_79
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_166_1_76, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_166_1_76, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (353) all_166_1_76 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_166_1_76, all_171_0_79 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_171_0_79, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_166_1_76, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (354) all_171_0_79 = all_166_1_76
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1, all_156_0_68, all_181_1_87 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_181_1_87, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_156_0_68, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (355) all_181_1_87 = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_181_0_86, all_16_1_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_181_0_86, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (356) all_181_0_86 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_166_0_75, all_171_1_80 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_171_1_80, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_166_0_75, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (357) all_171_1_80 = all_166_0_75
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_156_1_69, all_181_0_86 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_181_0_86, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_156_1_69, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (358) all_181_0_86 = all_156_1_69
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_156_1_69, all_166_0_75 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_166_0_75, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_156_1_69, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (359) all_166_0_75 = all_156_1_69
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_74_1_35, all_171_1_80 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_171_1_80, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_74_1_35, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (360) all_171_1_80 = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_176_2_85, all_181_2_88 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_181_2_88, distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_176_2_85, yields:
% 32.17/9.60  																											| (361) all_181_2_88 = all_176_2_85
% 32.17/9.60  																											|
% 32.17/9.60  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_161_2_74, all_181_2_88 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_181_2_88, distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_161_2_74, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (362) all_181_2_88 = all_161_2_74
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_156_2_70, all_176_2_85 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_176_2_85, distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_156_2_70, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (363) all_176_2_85 = all_156_2_70
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_166_2_77, all_171_2_81 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_171_2_81, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_166_2_77, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (364) all_171_2_81 = all_166_2_77
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_151_2_67, all_171_2_81 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_171_2_81, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_151_2_67, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (365) all_171_2_81 = all_151_2_67
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_146_2_64, all_166_2_77 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_166_2_77, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_146_2_64, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (366) all_166_2_77 = all_146_2_64
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (367)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (46) with all_1_3_3 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (368)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_76_0_37, all_80_0_43 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_80_0_43, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_76_0_37, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (369) all_80_0_43 = all_76_0_37
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_72_0_31, all_80_0_43 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_80_0_43, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_31, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (370) all_80_0_43 = all_72_0_31
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_72_2_33, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_72_2_33, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (371) all_72_2_33 = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_88_2_48, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_88_2_48, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (372) all_88_2_48 = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, 0, all_106_2_57 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_2_57, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (373) all_106_2_57 = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_92_2_51, all_20_0_12 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_2_51, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (374) all_92_2_51 = all_20_0_12
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_70_0_28, all_92_2_51 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_2_51, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_70_0_28, yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (375) all_92_2_51 = all_70_0_28
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (358,356) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (376) all_156_1_69 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 376 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (377) all_156_1_69 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (352,355) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (378) all_171_0_79 = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 378 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (379) all_171_0_79 = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (361,362) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (380) all_176_2_85 = all_161_2_74
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 380 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (381) all_176_2_85 = all_161_2_74
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (347,349) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (382) all_151_1_66 = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 382 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (383) all_151_1_66 = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (381,363) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (384) all_161_2_74 = all_156_2_70
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 384 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (385) all_161_2_74 = all_156_2_70
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (354,379) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (386) all_166_1_76 = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 386 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (387) all_166_1_76 = all_156_0_68
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (357,360) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (388) all_166_0_75 = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 388 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (389) all_166_0_75 = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (364,365) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (390) all_166_2_77 = all_151_2_67
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 390 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (391) all_166_2_77 = all_151_2_67
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (359,389) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (392) all_156_1_69 = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 392 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (393) all_156_1_69 = all_74_1_35
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (353,387) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (394) all_156_0_68 = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (366,391) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (395) all_151_2_67 = all_146_2_64
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (345,344) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (396) all_146_1_63 = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 396 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (397) all_146_1_63 = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (393,377) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (398) all_74_1_35 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 398 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (399) all_74_1_35 = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (383,348) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (400) all_111_0_58 = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (375,374) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (401) all_70_0_28 = all_20_0_12
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 401 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (402) all_70_0_28 = all_20_0_12
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (340,342) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (403) all_80_2_45 = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 403 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (404) all_80_2_45 = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (369,370) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (405) all_76_0_37 = all_72_0_31
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 405 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (406) all_76_0_37 = all_72_0_31
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Combining equations (341,404) yields a new equation:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (407) all_78_2_42 = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| Simplifying 407 yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (408) all_78_2_42 = all_70_2_30
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (339) and (182) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (49) line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (404) and (193) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (410) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (339) and (183) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (411) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_76_1_38
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (397) and (269) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (50) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (346) and (325) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (277) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_151_0_65
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (400) and (227) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (228) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (342) and (200) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (415) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_88_0_46
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (394) and (290) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (399) and (177) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (63) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (385) and (298) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (287) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_156_2_70
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (395) and (279) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (270) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_146_2_64
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (406) and (184) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (173) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_31
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (371) and (174) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (133) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (372) and (201) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (134) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (373) and (220) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (196) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											| From (402) and (169) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (75) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_12
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.61  																											|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.61  																											| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.17/9.61  																											|
% 32.17/9.61  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (350), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.61  																												|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.61  																												| (426)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_88_0_46)
% 32.17/9.61  																												|
% 32.17/9.61  																													| From (408) and (426) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																													| (427)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_88_0_46)
% 32.17/9.61  																													|
% 32.17/9.61  																													| Using (415) and (427) yields:
% 32.17/9.61  																													| (136) $false
% 32.17/9.61  																													|
% 32.17/9.61  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.61  																												|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.61  																												| (429) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_78_2_42) = all_88_0_46
% 32.17/9.61  																												| (430) all_88_0_46 = all_78_1_41
% 32.17/9.61  																												|
% 32.17/9.61  																													| From (430) and (415) follows:
% 32.17/9.61  																													| (431) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_78_1_41
% 32.17/9.62  																													|
% 32.17/9.62  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (343), into two cases.
% 32.17/9.62  																													|-Branch one:
% 32.17/9.62  																													| (432)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_76_1_38)
% 32.17/9.62  																													|
% 32.17/9.62  																														| Using (411) and (432) yields:
% 32.17/9.62  																														| (136) $false
% 32.17/9.62  																														|
% 32.17/9.62  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.17/9.62  																													|-Branch two:
% 32.17/9.62  																													| (411) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_76_1_38
% 32.17/9.62  																													| (435) all_76_1_38 = all_72_1_32
% 32.17/9.62  																													|
% 32.17/9.62  																														| From (435) and (411) follows:
% 32.17/9.62  																														| (172) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32
% 32.62/9.62  																														|
% 32.62/9.62  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (351), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																														|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																														| (437)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_78_1_41)
% 32.62/9.62  																														|
% 32.62/9.62  																															| Using (431) and (437) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																															| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.62  																															|
% 32.62/9.62  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.62  																														|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.62  																														| (431) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_78_1_41
% 32.62/9.62  																														| (440) all_78_1_41 = all_70_1_29
% 32.62/9.62  																														|
% 32.62/9.62  																															| From (440) and (431) follows:
% 32.62/9.62  																															| (168) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29
% 32.62/9.62  																															|
% 32.62/9.62  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																															|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																															| (442) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																															|
% 32.62/9.62  																																| Using (442) and (368) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.62  																																|
% 32.62/9.62  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.62  																															|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.62  																															| (368)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																															| (445) all_20_0_12 = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																															|
% 32.62/9.62  																																| From (445) and (75) follows:
% 32.62/9.62  																																| (446) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																|
% 32.62/9.62  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																| (447)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																|
% 32.62/9.62  																																	| Using (446) and (447) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																	| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.62  																																|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.62  																																| (446) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																| (450)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																|
% 32.62/9.62  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																	| (447)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| Using (446) and (447) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.62  																																	| (446) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																	| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)))
% 32.62/9.62  																																	|
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| Instantiating (454) with all_217_0_93, all_217_1_94, all_217_2_95 yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (455) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_217_2_95 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_217_2_95) = all_217_1_94 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_217_0_93 & ( ~ (all_217_1_94 = 0) | (all_217_0_93 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (455) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (456) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_217_2_95
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (457) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_217_2_95) = all_217_1_94
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (458) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_217_0_93
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (459)  ~ (all_217_1_94 = 0) | (all_217_0_93 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|
% 32.62/9.62  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (447)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Using (446) and (447) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (446) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																		| (463)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																		|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Instantiating (463) with all_226_0_96, all_226_1_97, all_226_2_98 yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (464) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_226_2_98 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_226_2_98) = all_226_1_97 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_226_0_96 & ( ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0) | all_226_0_96 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (464) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (465) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_226_2_98
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (466) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_226_2_98) = all_226_1_97
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (467) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_226_0_96
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (468)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0) | all_226_0_96 = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_226_2_98, all_92_1_50 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_226_2_98, line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_92_1_50, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (469) all_226_2_98 = all_92_1_50
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_226_0_96, all_72_0_31 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_226_0_96, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_72_0_31, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (470) all_226_0_96 = all_72_0_31
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, 0, all_217_0_93 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_217_0_93, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (471) all_217_0_93 = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Using (467) and (368) yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (472)  ~ (all_226_0_96 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| Equations (470) can reduce 472 to:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (473)  ~ (all_72_0_31 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| From (469) and (466) follows:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (474) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| From (471) and (458) follows:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (446) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																			| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																			|
% 32.62/9.62  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																				| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																				|
% 32.62/9.62  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (468), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.62  																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.62  																																					| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.62/9.62  																																					|
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_1_56, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| (479)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																						|
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_226_1_97, all_1_0_0, all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| (480) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																						|
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_226_1_97, all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| (481) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																						|
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_226_1_97, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| (482) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.62  																																						|
% 32.62/9.62  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_226_1_97, all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (483) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_226_1_97, all_16_1_7, all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (484) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_1_7, all_226_1_97, all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (485) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_226_1_97, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (486) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_1_7, all_226_1_97, all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (487) all_226_1_97 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_226_1_97, all_226_1_97, all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (488) all_226_1_97 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_92_1_50) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_226_1_97, all_226_1_97, all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (489) all_226_1_97 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_80_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (490) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_80_1_44, all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (491) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_80_1_44, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (492) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (493) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_80_1_44, all_16_1_7, all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (494) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_1_7, all_80_1_44, all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (495) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_80_1_44, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (496) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_1_7, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (497) all_80_1_44 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_80_1_44, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (498) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_80_1_44, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (499) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_151_0_65, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = all_151_0_65, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (500) all_151_0_65 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (32) with all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (501)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_111_1_59, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (502) all_111_1_59 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (34) with all_24_1_19, all_111_1_59, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_24_1_19, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (503)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_24_1_19) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0))))
% 32.62/9.63  																																						|
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_1_0_0, all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.63  																																						| (504) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_0_0, all_106_0_55, all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (505) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_106_0_55, all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (506) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_1_0_0, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (507) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_16_1_7, all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (508) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_1_7, all_106_0_55, all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (509) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_106_0_55, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (510) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_16_1_7, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (511) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_80_1_44, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (512) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_80_1_44, all_106_0_55, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (513) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_106_0_55, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (514) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_80_1_44, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (515) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_72_1_32, all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (516) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_72_1_32, all_106_0_55, all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (517) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_106_0_55, all_72_1_32, all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (518) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_72_1_32, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (519) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (520) all_106_0_55 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_70_1_29, all_72_1_32, all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (521) all_72_1_32 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_72_1_32, all_70_1_29, all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (522) all_72_1_32 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_70_1_29, all_111_1_59, all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (523) all_111_1_59 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_70_1_29, all_106_0_55, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (524) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_106_0_55, all_70_1_29, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (525) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.64  																																						|
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_70_1_29, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.64  																																						| (526) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (29) with all_106_0_55, all_70_1_29, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (527) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (31) with all_111_1_59, all_16_1_7, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (528) all_111_1_59 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_146_2_64, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = 0, distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = all_146_2_64, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (529) all_146_2_64 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_156_2_70, all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = all_156_2_70,  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0), yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (530) all_156_2_70 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (37) with 0, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (531)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (532)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (43) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (6) with 0, all_106_1_56, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_106_1_56, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (534)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_16_1_7, all_106_0_55, all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (535) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_106_0_55, all_16_1_7, all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (536) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_106_0_55, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (537) all_106_0_55 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_106_0_55, all_70_1_29, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (538) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_70_1_29, all_106_0_55, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (539) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (39) with 0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (540)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_16_1_7, all_106_0_55, all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (541) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_226_1_97, all_226_1_97, all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = all_226_1_97, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (542) all_226_1_97 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (7) with all_80_1_44, all_80_1_44, all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = all_80_1_44, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (543) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_106_0_55, all_16_1_7, all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = all_16_1_7, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (544) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_106_0_55, all_106_0_55, all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (545) all_106_0_55 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_106_0_55, all_70_1_29, all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (546) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating formula (42) with all_70_1_29, all_106_0_55, all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = all_106_0_55, apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_70_1_29, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (547) all_106_0_55 = 0 | all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating (503) with all_271_0_102, all_271_1_103, all_271_2_104 yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (548) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_271_1_103 & convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_271_2_104 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_24_1_19) = all_271_0_102 & ( ~ (all_271_2_104 = 0) | all_271_0_102 = 0 | ( ~ (all_271_1_103 = 0) &  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0)))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (548) yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (549) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_271_1_103
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (550) convergent_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_271_2_104
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (551) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_24_1_19) = all_271_0_102
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (552)  ~ (all_271_2_104 = 0) | all_271_0_102 = 0 | ( ~ (all_271_1_103 = 0) &  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0))
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating (540) with all_283_0_120, all_283_1_121, all_283_2_122 yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (553) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_283_2_122 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_283_2_122) = all_283_1_121 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_283_0_120 & ( ~ (all_283_1_121 = 0) | all_283_0_120 = 0)
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (553) yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (554) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_283_2_122
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (555) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_283_2_122) = all_283_1_121
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (556) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_283_0_120
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (557)  ~ (all_283_1_121 = 0) | all_283_0_120 = 0
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating (534) with all_287_0_126, all_287_1_127, all_287_2_128 yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (558) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = all_287_1_127 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_287_0_126 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_287_2_128 & ( ~ (all_287_1_127 = 0) |  ~ (all_287_2_128 = 0) | all_287_0_126 = 0)
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (558) yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (559) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = all_287_1_127
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (560) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_287_0_126
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (561) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_287_2_128
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (562)  ~ (all_287_1_127 = 0) |  ~ (all_287_2_128 = 0) | all_287_0_126 = 0
% 32.62/9.65  																																						|
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| Instantiating (533) with all_289_0_129, all_289_1_130, all_289_2_131 yields:
% 32.62/9.65  																																						| (563) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_289_1_130 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_289_0_129 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_289_2_131 & ( ~ (all_289_1_130 = 0) |  ~ (all_289_2_131 = 0) | all_289_0_129 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (563) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (564) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_289_1_130
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (565) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_289_0_129
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (566) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_289_2_131
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (567)  ~ (all_289_1_130 = 0) |  ~ (all_289_2_131 = 0) | all_289_0_129 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Instantiating (532) with all_291_0_132, all_291_1_133, all_291_2_134 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (568) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_291_2_134 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_291_2_134) = all_291_1_133 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_291_0_132 & ( ~ (all_291_1_133 = 0) | all_291_0_132 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (568) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (569) line_connecting(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_291_2_134
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (570) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_291_2_134) = all_291_1_133
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (571) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_291_0_132
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (572)  ~ (all_291_1_133 = 0) | all_291_0_132 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Instantiating (531) with all_295_0_138, all_295_1_139, all_295_2_140 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (573) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_295_2_140 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_295_2_140) = all_295_1_139 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_295_0_138 & ( ~ (all_295_1_139 = 0) | all_295_0_138 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (573) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (574) line_connecting(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_295_2_140
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (575) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_295_2_140) = all_295_1_139
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (576) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_295_0_138
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (577)  ~ (all_295_1_139 = 0) | all_295_0_138 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Instantiating (479) with all_303_0_150, all_303_1_151, all_303_2_152 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (578) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = all_303_1_151 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_303_0_150 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_303_2_152 & ( ~ (all_303_1_151 = 0) |  ~ (all_303_2_152 = 0) | all_303_0_150 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (578) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (579) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = all_303_1_151
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (580) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_303_0_150
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (581) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_303_2_152
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (582)  ~ (all_303_1_151 = 0) |  ~ (all_303_2_152 = 0) | all_303_0_150 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																							| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																							| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																						| (586) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																						|
% 32.62/9.66  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																							| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|
% 32.62/9.66  																																								| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																								| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																							| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																							| (590) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																							|
% 32.62/9.66  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (492), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																								| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|
% 32.62/9.66  																																									| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																									| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																								| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																								| (594) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																								|
% 32.62/9.66  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (493), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																									| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|
% 32.62/9.66  																																										| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																										| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																									| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																									| (598) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																									|
% 32.62/9.66  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																										| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|
% 32.62/9.66  																																											| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																											| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																										| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																										| (602) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																										|
% 32.62/9.66  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																											| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|
% 32.62/9.66  																																												| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																												| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																											| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																											| (606) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																											|
% 32.62/9.66  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (482), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																												| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|
% 32.62/9.66  																																													| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																													| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																												| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																												| (610) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																												|
% 32.62/9.66  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (483), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																													| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|
% 32.62/9.66  																																														| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																														| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																														|
% 32.62/9.66  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																													| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																													| (614) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																													|
% 32.62/9.66  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (529), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																														| (615) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																														|
% 32.62/9.66  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (590), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																															| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																															|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																															| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																															| (619)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																															|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| Instantiating (619) with all_358_0_168, all_358_1_169, all_358_2_170, all_358_3_171 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (620) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_358_1_169 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_358_0_168 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = all_358_2_170 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_358_3_171 & ( ~ (all_358_2_170 = 0) |  ~ (all_358_3_171 = 0) | all_358_0_168 = 0 | all_358_1_169 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (620) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (621)  ~ (all_358_2_170 = 0) |  ~ (all_358_3_171 = 0) | all_358_0_168 = 0 | all_358_1_169 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (622) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_358_3_171
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (623) distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = all_358_2_170
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (624) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_358_0_168
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (625) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_358_1_169
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (594), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																| (629)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																																|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| Instantiating (629) with all_363_0_172, all_363_1_173, all_363_2_174, all_363_3_175 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (630) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_363_0_172 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_363_1_173 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = all_363_2_174 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_363_3_175 & ( ~ (all_363_2_174 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_175 = 0) | all_363_0_172 = 0 | all_363_1_173 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (630) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (631) distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_1_1) = all_363_2_174
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (632) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_363_3_175
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (633) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (634)  ~ (all_363_2_174 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_175 = 0) | all_363_0_172 = 0 | all_363_1_173 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (635) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_363_1_173
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (606), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	| (639)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.66  																																																	|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| Instantiating (639) with all_465_0_206, all_465_1_207, all_465_2_208, all_465_3_209 yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (640) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_465_1_207 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_465_0_206 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = all_465_2_208 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_465_3_209 & ( ~ (all_465_2_208 = 0) |  ~ (all_465_3_209 = 0) | all_465_0_206 = 0 | all_465_1_207 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (640) yields:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (641) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_465_3_209
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (642) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_465_1_207
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (643) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_465_0_206
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (644) distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = all_465_2_208
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (645)  ~ (all_465_2_208 = 0) |  ~ (all_465_3_209 = 0) | all_465_0_206 = 0 | all_465_1_207 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (610), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																			| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.66  																																																			|
% 32.62/9.66  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.66  																																																		| (649)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																		|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| Instantiating (649) with all_470_0_210, all_470_1_211, all_470_2_212, all_470_3_213 yields:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (650) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_470_0_210 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_470_1_211 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = all_470_2_212 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_470_3_213 & ( ~ (all_470_2_212 = 0) |  ~ (all_470_3_213 = 0) | all_470_0_210 = 0 | all_470_1_211 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (650) yields:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (651) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_470_0_210
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (652) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_470_1_211
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (653) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_470_3_213
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (654)  ~ (all_470_2_212 = 0) |  ~ (all_470_3_213 = 0) | all_470_0_210 = 0 | all_470_1_211 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (655) distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_1_1) = all_470_2_212
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			| (659)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				| (663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					| (667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																					|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						| (671) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																						|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							| (675) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																							|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (526), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								| (679) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																								|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (546), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									| (683) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																									|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										| (687) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																										|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (508), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											| (691) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																											|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												| (695) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																												|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (524), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													| (699) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																													|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (527), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														| (703) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																														|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															| (707) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																															|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																| (711) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	| (715) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (522), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		| (719) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			| (723) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				| (727) all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																				|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (517), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																						| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																						| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																						|
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.67  																																																																					| (731) all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																					|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						| (735) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																						|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (513), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							| (739) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																							|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								| (743) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																								|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									| (747) all_80_1_44 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																									|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										| (751) all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																										|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											| (755) all_72_1_32 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																											|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (598), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												| (759)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																												|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| Instantiating (759) with all_762_0_224, all_762_1_225, all_762_2_226, all_762_3_227 yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (760) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_762_1_225 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_762_0_224 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = all_762_2_226 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_762_3_227 & ( ~ (all_762_2_226 = 0) |  ~ (all_762_3_227 = 0) | all_762_0_224 = 0 | all_762_1_225 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (760) yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (761) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_762_3_227
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (762) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = all_762_0_224
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (763) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_70_2_30) = all_762_2_226
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (764) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_762_1_225
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (765)  ~ (all_762_2_226 = 0) |  ~ (all_762_3_227 = 0) | all_762_0_224 = 0 | all_762_1_225 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (602), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													| (769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																													|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| Instantiating (769) with all_767_0_228, all_767_1_229, all_767_2_230, all_767_3_231 yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (770) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_767_0_228 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_767_1_229 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = all_767_2_230 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_767_3_231 & ( ~ (all_767_2_230 = 0) |  ~ (all_767_3_231 = 0) | all_767_0_228 = 0 | all_767_1_229 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (770) yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (771) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_767_1_229
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (772) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_767_0_228
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (773) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = all_767_2_230
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (774)  ~ (all_767_2_230 = 0) |  ~ (all_767_3_231 = 0) | all_767_0_228 = 0 | all_767_1_229 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (775) distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_767_3_231
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (614), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (87) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| Equations (87) can reduce 53 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (53)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														| (779)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																														|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| Instantiating (779) with all_772_0_232, all_772_1_233, all_772_2_234, all_772_3_235 yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (780) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_772_1_233 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_772_0_232 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = all_772_2_234 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_772_3_235 & ( ~ (all_772_2_234 = 0) |  ~ (all_772_3_235 = 0) | all_772_0_232 = 0 | all_772_1_233 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (780) yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (781) apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = all_772_0_232
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (782) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_92_1_50) = all_772_2_234
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (783) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_772_3_235
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (784)  ~ (all_772_2_234 = 0) |  ~ (all_772_3_235 = 0) | all_772_0_232 = 0 | all_772_1_233 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (785) apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_772_1_233
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (727), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															| (789)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																															|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (731), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																| (793)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (751), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	| (797)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																	|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (755), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		| (476)  ~ (all_72_1_32 = 0)
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		| (801)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																		|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_762_1_225, all_772_1_233 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_772_1_233, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_762_1_225, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (802) all_772_1_233 = all_762_1_225
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_762_1_225, all_767_0_228 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_767_0_228, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_762_1_225, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (803) all_767_0_228 = all_762_1_225
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_470_0_210, all_772_1_233 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_772_1_233, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_470_0_210, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (804) all_772_1_233 = all_470_0_210
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_465_1_207, all_72_1_32 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_465_1_207, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_72_1_32, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (805) all_465_1_207 = all_72_1_32
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_465_1_207, all_762_1_225 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_762_1_225, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_465_1_207, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (806) all_762_1_225 = all_465_1_207
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_363_0_172, all_767_0_228 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_767_0_228, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_363_0_172, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (807) all_767_0_228 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_358_1_169, all_465_1_207 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_465_1_207, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_358_1_169, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (808) all_465_1_207 = all_358_1_169
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, 0, all_358_1_169 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = all_358_1_169, apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (809) all_358_1_169 = 0
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Combining equations (802,804) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (810) all_762_1_225 = all_470_0_210
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Simplifying 810 yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (811) all_762_1_225 = all_470_0_210
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Combining equations (803,807) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (812) all_762_1_225 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Simplifying 812 yields:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (813) all_762_1_225 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Combining equations (813,811) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (814) all_470_0_210 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Combining equations (806,811) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| (815) all_470_0_210 = all_465_1_207
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.68  																																																																																			| Combining equations (815,814) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (816) all_465_1_207 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Simplifying 816 yields:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (817) all_465_1_207 = all_363_0_172
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Combining equations (805,817) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (818) all_363_0_172 = all_72_1_32
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Combining equations (808,817) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (819) all_363_0_172 = all_358_1_169
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Combining equations (819,818) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (820) all_358_1_169 = all_72_1_32
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Simplifying 820 yields:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (821) all_358_1_169 = all_72_1_32
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Combining equations (809,821) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| Equations (712) can reduce 476 to:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.69  																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.69  																																														| (824)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 32.62/9.69  																																														| (825) all_146_2_64 = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																														|
% 32.62/9.69  																																															| From (825) and (270) follows:
% 32.62/9.69  																																															| (826) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																															|
% 32.62/9.69  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (530), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.69  																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.69  																																															| (827)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 32.62/9.69  																																															|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| Using (826) and (827) yields:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| (136) $false
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.62/9.69  																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.62/9.69  																																															| (826) distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																															| (830) all_156_2_70 = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																															|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| Combining equations (830,363) yields a new equation:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| (831) all_176_2_85 = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| From (830) and (287) follows:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| (832) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.62/9.69  																																																|
% 32.62/9.69  																																																	| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.62/9.69  																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.62/9.69  																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																| (836)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	| (840)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		| (844)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																		|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			| (848)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_92_1_50) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																			|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				| (852)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																				|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (489), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					| (856)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																					|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (487), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						| (860) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																						|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (494), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							| (864) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																							|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								| (868) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																								|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (484), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									| (872) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																									|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (485), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										| (876) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																										|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (486), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												| Equations (599) can reduce 478 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											| (478)  ~ (all_226_1_97 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											| (880) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																											|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (496), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												| (884) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																												|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														| Equations (583) can reduce 477 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													| (477)  ~ (all_80_1_44 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													| (888) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																													|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														| (659)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																														|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															| (663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																															|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																| (667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (504), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	| (904) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (505), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																			| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.69  																																																																		| (908) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			| (912) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				| (916) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_106_1_56) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_106_1_56) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					| (920) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						| (924) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_106_1_56) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (541), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							| (928) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									| Equations (656) can reduce 425 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								| (425)  ~ (all_106_0_55 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								| (932) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (860), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									| (936)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (864), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										| (940)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (868), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											| (944)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (872), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												| (948)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_92_1_50) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																												|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (876), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													| (952)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																													|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (880), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														| (956)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_92_1_50) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_92_1_50, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																														|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (884), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															| (960)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_70_2_30, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																															|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (888), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																| (964)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_70_2_30) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (928), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	| (968)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																	|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (932), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		| (222) all_16_1_7 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Equations (222) can reduce 139 to:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		| (139)  ~ (all_16_1_7 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		| (972)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																		|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating (972) with all_870_0_553, all_870_1_554, all_870_2_555 yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (973) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = all_870_1_554 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_870_0_553 & distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = all_870_2_555 & ( ~ (all_870_2_555 = 0) | all_870_0_553 = 0 | all_870_1_554 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (973) yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (974) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_106_1_56) = all_870_1_554
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (975) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_870_0_553
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (976) distinct_lines(all_106_1_56, all_1_2_2) = all_870_2_555
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (977)  ~ (all_870_2_555 = 0) | all_870_0_553 = 0 | all_870_1_554 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_289_1_130, all_111_1_59 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_289_1_130, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_111_1_59, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (978) all_289_1_130 = all_111_1_59
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_289_1_130, all_870_0_553 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_870_0_553, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_289_1_130, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (979) all_870_0_553 = all_289_1_130
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_271_1_103, all_870_0_553 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_870_0_553, apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = all_271_1_103, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (980) all_870_0_553 = all_271_1_103
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_303_0_150, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_303_0_150, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (981) all_303_0_150 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_283_0_120, all_303_0_150 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_303_0_150, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_283_0_120, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (982) all_303_0_150 = all_283_0_120
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_291_0_132, all_295_0_138 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_295_0_138, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_291_0_132, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (983) all_295_0_138 = all_291_0_132
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_289_0_129, all_295_0_138 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_295_0_138, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_289_0_129, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (984) all_295_0_138 = all_289_0_129
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Using (565) and (141) yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (985)  ~ (all_289_0_129 = 0)
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_287_0_126, all_295_0_138 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_295_0_138, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_287_0_126, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (986) all_295_0_138 = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_289_2_131, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_289_2_131, distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (987) all_289_2_131 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Combining equations (979,980) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (988) all_289_1_130 = all_271_1_103
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Simplifying 988 yields:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (989) all_289_1_130 = all_271_1_103
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Combining equations (981,982) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (990) all_283_0_120 = 0
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| Combining equations (984,983) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			| (991) all_291_0_132 = all_289_0_129
% 32.95/9.70  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Combining equations (986,983) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (992) all_291_0_132 = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Combining equations (991,992) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (993) all_289_0_129 = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Simplifying 993 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (994) all_289_0_129 = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Combining equations (978,989) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (995) all_271_1_103 = all_111_1_59
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Combining equations (995,989) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (978) all_289_1_130 = all_111_1_59
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| Equations (994) can reduce 985 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (997)  ~ (all_287_0_126 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| From (990) and (556) follows:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (133) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| From (994) and (565) follows:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (560) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (1000)  ~ (all_289_1_130 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| Equations (978) can reduce 1000 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1001)  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (523), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1002) all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| Equations (1002) can reduce 1001 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1001)  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1005) all_70_1_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_70_2_30) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_70_2_30) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (1002) all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						| Equations (1002) can reduce 1001 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (1001)  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (1009) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_2_2, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (528), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						| (1010)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							| Using (832) and (1010) yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							| (136) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						| (832) distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						| (1013) all_111_1_59 = 0 | all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																						|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1013), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							| (1002) all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								| Equations (1002) can reduce 1001 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							| (1001)  ~ (all_111_1_59 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							| (1017) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																							|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								| (1018) all_151_0_65 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| From (1018) and (277) follows:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1019) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1020)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Using (1019) and (1020) yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (136) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1019) apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_1_1) = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1023)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Instantiating (1023) with all_1026_0_620, all_1026_1_621, all_1026_2_622 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1024) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_2_622 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1026_1_621 & distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_0_620 & ( ~ (all_1026_2_622 = 0) | (all_1026_0_620 = 0 & all_1026_1_621 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1024) yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1025) distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_2_622
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1026) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1026_1_621
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1027) distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_0_620
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1028)  ~ (all_1026_2_622 = 0) | (all_1026_0_620 = 0 & all_1026_1_621 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1026_2_622, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_2_622, distinct_points(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1029) all_1026_2_622 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (33) with all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1026_0_620, all_287_0_126 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_1026_0_620, distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_287_0_126, yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1030) all_1026_0_620 = all_287_0_126
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Using (1027) and (141) yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1031)  ~ (all_1026_0_620 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Equations (1030) can reduce 1031 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (997)  ~ (all_287_0_126 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1028), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1033)  ~ (all_1026_2_622 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Equations (1029) can reduce 1033 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1029) all_1026_2_622 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1036) all_1026_0_620 = 0 & all_1026_1_621 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1036) yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1037) all_1026_0_620 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1038) all_1026_1_621 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Combining equations (1037,1030) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1039) all_287_0_126 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Equations (1039) can reduce 997 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								| (1041)  ~ (all_151_0_65 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								| (1042) all_16_1_7 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_5_5, all_1_1_1) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																								|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1043)  ~ (all_176_2_85 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| Equations (831) can reduce 1043 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (831) all_176_2_85 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									| (1046) all_176_0_83 = 0 | all_176_1_84 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																									|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1046), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1047) all_176_0_83 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Combining equations (349,1047) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1048) all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Simplifying 1048 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1002) all_111_1_59 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Equations (1002) can reduce 1001 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1051)  ~ (all_176_0_83 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										| (1052) all_176_1_84 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																										|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Combining equations (346,1052) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1053) all_151_0_65 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Simplifying 1053 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (1018) all_151_0_65 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| Equations (1018) can reduce 1041 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (1056) all_289_1_130 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			| (1057)  ~ (all_289_2_131 = 0) | all_289_0_129 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																			|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1057), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1058)  ~ (all_289_2_131 = 0)
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| Equations (987) can reduce 1058 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (987) all_289_2_131 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				| (1061) all_289_0_129 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| Combining equations (994,1061) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (1062) all_287_0_126 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| Simplifying 1062 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (1039) all_287_0_126 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| Equations (1039) can reduce 997 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| (599) all_226_1_97 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| (1066) all_226_0_96 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																						| Combining equations (1066,470) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																						| (1067) all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																						|
% 32.95/9.71  																																						| Equations (1067) can reduce 473 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																						| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																						|
% 32.95/9.71  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																				| (583) all_80_1_44 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																				| (1070) all_80_0_43 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																				|
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| Combining equations (370,1070) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| (1071) all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| Simplifying 1071 yields:
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| (1067) all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| Equations (1067) can reduce 473 to:
% 32.95/9.71  																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|
% 32.95/9.71  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.71  																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.71  																																			| (712) all_72_1_32 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																			| (1075)  ~ (all_72_2_33 = 0) | all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.95/9.71  																																			|
% 32.95/9.72  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1075), into two cases.
% 32.95/9.72  																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.95/9.72  																																				| (1076)  ~ (all_72_2_33 = 0)
% 32.95/9.72  																																				|
% 32.95/9.72  																																					| Equations (371) can reduce 1076 to:
% 32.95/9.72  																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  																																					|
% 32.95/9.72  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  																																				| (371) all_72_2_33 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  																																				| (1067) all_72_0_31 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  																																				|
% 32.95/9.72  																																					| Equations (1067) can reduce 473 to:
% 32.95/9.72  																																					| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  																																					|
% 32.95/9.72  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  																											|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  																											| (656) all_106_0_55 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  																											| (1082)  ~ (all_106_2_57 = 0)
% 32.95/9.72  																											|
% 32.95/9.72  																												| Equations (373) can reduce 1082 to:
% 32.95/9.72  																												| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  																												|
% 32.95/9.72  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  							|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  							| (1084) all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  							|
% 32.95/9.72  								| Applying alpha-rule on (1084) yields:
% 32.95/9.72  								| (445) all_20_0_12 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  								| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  								|
% 32.95/9.72  								| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.95/9.72  								| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  								|
% 32.95/9.72  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  						|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  						| (1084) all_20_0_12 = 0 & all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  						|
% 32.95/9.72  							| Applying alpha-rule on (1084) yields:
% 32.95/9.72  							| (445) all_20_0_12 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  							| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  							|
% 32.95/9.72  							| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.95/9.72  							| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  							|
% 32.95/9.72  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  					|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  					| (1092)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 32.95/9.72  					| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  					|
% 32.95/9.72  						| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.95/9.72  						| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  						|
% 32.95/9.72  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  		|-Branch two:
% 32.95/9.72  		| (1095) all_22_1_16 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  		| (1096) all_22_0_15 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  		|
% 32.95/9.72  			| Combining equations (116,1096) yields a new equation:
% 32.95/9.72  			| (1097) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  			|
% 32.95/9.72  			| Simplifying 1097 yields:
% 32.95/9.72  			| (209) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.95/9.72  			|
% 32.95/9.72  			| Equations (209) can reduce 119 to:
% 32.95/9.72  			| (88) $false
% 32.95/9.72  			|
% 32.95/9.72  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.95/9.72  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 32.95/9.72  
% 32.95/9.72  9121ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------