TSTP Solution File: GEO180+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  27   ~;  50   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (   0 sgn  42   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
       => apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(apart4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        | distinct_points(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).

fof(cu1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & distinct_lines(X4,X5) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

fof(apart1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).

fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(ceq1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
       => ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
         => apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
      | distinct_lines(X5,X6)
      | apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
      | distinct_points(X4,X6)
      | distinct_points(X5,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X6,X7)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X8,X9)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X9)
      | apart_point_and_line(X7,X8)
      | apart_point_and_line(X7,X9) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cu1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
      | distinct_points(X4,X6)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X5) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X1)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | distinct_points(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_34]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_37]),c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GEO180+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 04:12:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 39
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 22
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 18
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 15
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.21/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.21/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 140
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 68
% 0.21/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 72
% 0.21/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 608
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 470
% 0.21/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 0.21/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 498
% 0.21/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 110
% 0.21/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 66
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.21/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 54
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 322
% 0.21/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1855
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.21/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1372
% 0.21/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 592
% 0.21/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 94
% 0.21/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.21/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9997
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.21/1.40  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3080 pages
% 0.21/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.21/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------