TSTP Solution File: GEO179+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO179+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.33s 1.45s
% Output   : Proof 5.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO179+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 00:55:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.49/0.57          ____       _                          
% 0.49/0.57    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.49/0.57   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.49/0.57  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.49/0.57  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.49/0.57  
% 0.49/0.57  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.49/0.57  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.49/0.57  
% 0.49/0.57  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.49/0.57  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.49/0.57  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.49/0.57  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.49/0.57  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.49/0.57  
% 0.49/0.57  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.49/0.57  
% 0.49/0.57  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.49/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.51/0.89  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.90/1.01  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.90/1.03  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.66/1.25  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.66/1.25  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.78/1.28  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.04/1.36  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.33/1.45  Prover 1: proved (199ms)
% 3.33/1.45  
% 3.33/1.45  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 3.33/1.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.33/1.45  
% 3.33/1.45  Generating proof ... found it (size 85)
% 5.23/1.89  
% 5.23/1.89  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 5.23/1.89  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 5.23/1.89  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v2, v1) = v6 & line_connecting(v2, v0) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_lines(v3, v6) = v7 & distinct_lines(v3, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : (apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = v15 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v8) = v14 & convergent_lines(v8, v9) = v13 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) &  ~ (v14 = 0))))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v9, v10) = v11) | apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v9) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | convergent_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v10) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_points(v9, v10) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (intersection_point(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (intersection_point(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (line_connecting(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (line_connecting(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v10) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v10) = v8)) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v8, v9) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (distinct_points(v10, v9) = v14 & distinct_points(v10, v8) = v13 & distinct_points(v8, v9) = v12 & ( ~ (v12 = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0)))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v9) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : (apart_point_and_line(v9, v11) = v15 & apart_point_and_line(v9, v10) = v14 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v11) = v13 & apart_point_and_line(v8, v10) = v12 & (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 | v12 = 0))) &  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v9) = 0) | distinct_lines(v8, v9) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v8) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v8) = 0) &  ! [v8] :  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v8) = 0) & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))
% 5.23/1.92  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 yields:
% 5.23/1.92  | (1) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1 & line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3 & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_4_4 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0 & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0 & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0))
% 5.23/1.93  |
% 5.23/1.93  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 5.23/1.93  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.23/1.93  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.23/1.93  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.23/1.93  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 5.23/1.93  | (6) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3
% 5.23/1.93  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 5.23/1.93  | (8)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.23/1.93  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 5.23/1.93  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 5.23/1.93  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 5.23/1.93  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 5.23/1.93  | (13) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 5.23/1.93  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.23/1.94  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.23/1.94  | (16) line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1
% 5.23/1.94  | (17) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.23/1.94  | (18) distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0
% 5.23/1.94  | (19) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_4_4
% 5.23/1.94  | (20) distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2
% 5.23/1.94  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 5.23/1.94  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 5.23/1.94  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 5.23/1.94  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 5.62/1.94  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 5.62/1.94  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 5.62/1.94  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (28) all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2 |  ~ (distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_0_0)
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_4_4, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (29)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v1 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating formula (26) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_1_1) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (30) all_0_0_0 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating formula (26) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_4_4) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (31) all_0_2_2 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating (29) with all_16_0_8, all_16_1_9, all_16_2_10 yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (32) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_16_0_8 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_16_1_9 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_16_2_10 & ( ~ (all_16_2_10 = 0) | (all_16_0_8 = 0 & all_16_1_9 = 0))
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Applying alpha-rule on (32) yields:
% 5.62/1.94  | (33) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_16_0_8
% 5.62/1.94  | (34) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_16_1_9
% 5.62/1.94  | (35) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_16_2_10
% 5.62/1.94  | (36)  ~ (all_16_2_10 = 0) | (all_16_0_8 = 0 & all_16_1_9 = 0)
% 5.62/1.94  |
% 5.62/1.94  | Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_16_2_10, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_16_2_10, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.95  | (37) all_16_2_10 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  |
% 5.62/1.95  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (36), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.95  |-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.95  | (38)  ~ (all_16_2_10 = 0)
% 5.62/1.95  |
% 5.62/1.95  	| Equations (37) can reduce 38 to:
% 5.62/1.95  	| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.95  	|
% 5.62/1.95  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.95  |-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.95  | (37) all_16_2_10 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  | (41) all_16_0_8 = 0 & all_16_1_9 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  |
% 5.62/1.95  	| Applying alpha-rule on (41) yields:
% 5.62/1.95  	| (42) all_16_0_8 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  	| (43) all_16_1_9 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  	|
% 5.62/1.95  	| From (42) and (33) follows:
% 5.62/1.95  	| (44) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 5.62/1.95  	|
% 5.62/1.95  	| From (43) and (34) follows:
% 5.62/1.95  	| (45) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 5.62/1.95  	|
% 5.62/1.95  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (28), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.95  	|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.95  	| (46)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_0_0)
% 5.62/1.95  	|
% 5.62/1.95  		| Using (20) and (46) yields:
% 5.62/1.95  		| (47)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2)
% 5.62/1.95  		|
% 5.62/1.95  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (8), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.95  		|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.95  		| (48)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 5.62/1.95  		|
% 5.62/1.95  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (30), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.95  			|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.95  			| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0
% 5.62/1.95  			|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (50)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Instantiating (50) with all_61_0_11, all_61_1_12, all_61_2_13 yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (51) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_61_1_12 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_0_11 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_2_13 & ( ~ (all_61_2_13 = 0) | (all_61_0_11 = 0 & all_61_1_12 = 0))
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Applying alpha-rule on (51) yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (52) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_61_1_12
% 5.62/1.95  				| (53) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_0_11
% 5.62/1.95  				| (54) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_2_13
% 5.62/1.95  				| (55)  ~ (all_61_2_13 = 0) | (all_61_0_11 = 0 & all_61_1_12 = 0)
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_5_5 yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (56)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_61_0_11, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_0_11, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (57) all_61_0_11 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_61_2_13, all_61_0_11 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_0_11, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_61_2_13, yields:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (58) all_61_0_11 = all_61_2_13
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				| Combining equations (57,58) yields a new equation:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (59) all_61_2_13 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (55), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.95  				|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (60)  ~ (all_61_2_13 = 0)
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  					| Equations (59) can reduce 60 to:
% 5.62/1.95  					| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.95  					|
% 5.62/1.95  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.95  				|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.95  				| (59) all_61_2_13 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  				| (63) all_61_0_11 = 0 & all_61_1_12 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  				|
% 5.62/1.95  					| Applying alpha-rule on (63) yields:
% 5.62/1.95  					| (57) all_61_0_11 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  					| (65) all_61_1_12 = 0
% 5.62/1.95  					|
% 5.62/1.95  					| From (65) and (52) follows:
% 5.62/1.95  					| (66) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.62/1.95  					|
% 5.62/1.95  					| Using (66) and (56) yields:
% 5.62/1.95  					| (67) $false
% 5.62/1.95  					|
% 5.62/1.95  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.96  			|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (68)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  			| (69) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Equations (69) can reduce 48 to:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.96  		|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.96  		| (69) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  		| (72)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  		|
% 5.62/1.96  			| Equations (69) can reduce 47 to:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (73)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  			| Simplifying 73 yields:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (72)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (31), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.96  			|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (75) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (76)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Instantiating (76) with all_85_0_38, all_85_1_39, all_85_2_40 yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (77) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_85_1_39 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_0_38 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_2_40 & ( ~ (all_85_2_40 = 0) | (all_85_0_38 = 0 & all_85_1_39 = 0))
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Applying alpha-rule on (77) yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (78) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_85_1_39
% 5.62/1.96  				| (79) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_0_38
% 5.62/1.96  				| (80) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_2_40
% 5.62/1.96  				| (81)  ~ (all_85_2_40 = 0) | (all_85_0_38 = 0 & all_85_1_39 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_5_5 yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (56)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_85_0_38, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_0_38, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (83) all_85_0_38 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_85_2_40, all_85_0_38 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_0_38, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_85_2_40, yields:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (84) all_85_0_38 = all_85_2_40
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Combining equations (83,84) yields a new equation:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (85) all_85_2_40 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (81), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.96  				|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (86)  ~ (all_85_2_40 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  					| Equations (85) can reduce 86 to:
% 5.62/1.96  					| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.96  					|
% 5.62/1.96  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.96  				|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (85) all_85_2_40 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  				| (89) all_85_0_38 = 0 & all_85_1_39 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  					| Applying alpha-rule on (89) yields:
% 5.62/1.96  					| (83) all_85_0_38 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  					| (91) all_85_1_39 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  					|
% 5.62/1.96  					| From (91) and (78) follows:
% 5.62/1.96  					| (66) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.62/1.96  					|
% 5.62/1.96  					| Using (66) and (56) yields:
% 5.62/1.96  					| (67) $false
% 5.62/1.96  					|
% 5.62/1.96  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.96  			|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (94)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  			| (95) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  				| Equations (95) can reduce 72 to:
% 5.62/1.96  				| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.96  				|
% 5.62/1.96  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.96  	|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.96  	| (97) distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_0_0_0
% 5.62/1.96  	| (98) all_0_0_0 = all_0_2_2
% 5.62/1.96  	|
% 5.62/1.96  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (8), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.96  		|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.96  		| (48)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  		|
% 5.62/1.96  			| Equations (98) can reduce 48 to:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (72)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.62/1.96  			|
% 5.62/1.96  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (31), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.96  			|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.96  			| (75) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 5.62/1.97  			|
% 5.62/1.97  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (30), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.97  				|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.97  				| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0
% 5.62/1.97  				|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (50)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_3_3, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (76)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v2 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating (76) with all_58_0_41, all_58_1_42, all_58_2_43 yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (105) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_58_1_42 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_0_41 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_2_43 & ( ~ (all_58_2_43 = 0) | (all_58_0_41 = 0 & all_58_1_42 = 0))
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Applying alpha-rule on (105) yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (106) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_58_1_42
% 5.62/1.97  					| (107) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_0_41
% 5.62/1.97  					| (108) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_2_43
% 5.62/1.97  					| (109)  ~ (all_58_2_43 = 0) | (all_58_0_41 = 0 & all_58_1_42 = 0)
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating (50) with all_60_0_44, all_60_1_45, all_60_2_46 yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (110) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_60_1_45 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_60_0_44 & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_60_2_46 & ( ~ (all_60_2_46 = 0) | (all_60_0_44 = 0 & all_60_1_45 = 0))
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Applying alpha-rule on (110) yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (111) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_60_1_45
% 5.62/1.97  					| (112) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_60_0_44
% 5.62/1.97  					| (113) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = all_60_2_46
% 5.62/1.97  					| (114)  ~ (all_60_2_46 = 0) | (all_60_0_44 = 0 & all_60_1_45 = 0)
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_5_5 yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (56)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_58_1_42, all_60_1_45 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_60_1_45, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_58_1_42, yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (116) all_60_1_45 = all_58_1_42
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_58_0_41, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_0_41, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (117) all_58_0_41 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_58_2_43, all_58_0_41 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_0_41, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = all_58_2_43, yields:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (118) all_58_0_41 = all_58_2_43
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| Combining equations (117,118) yields a new equation:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (119) all_58_2_43 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					| From (116) and (111) follows:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (106) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = all_58_1_42
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (109), into two cases.
% 5.62/1.97  					|-Branch one:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (121)  ~ (all_58_2_43 = 0)
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  						| Equations (119) can reduce 121 to:
% 5.62/1.97  						| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.97  						|
% 5.62/1.97  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.97  					|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.97  					| (119) all_58_2_43 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  					| (124) all_58_0_41 = 0 & all_58_1_42 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  					|
% 5.62/1.97  						| Applying alpha-rule on (124) yields:
% 5.62/1.97  						| (117) all_58_0_41 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  						| (126) all_58_1_42 = 0
% 5.62/1.97  						|
% 5.62/1.97  						| From (126) and (106) follows:
% 5.62/1.97  						| (66) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 5.62/1.97  						|
% 5.62/1.97  						| Using (66) and (56) yields:
% 5.62/1.97  						| (67) $false
% 5.62/1.97  						|
% 5.62/1.97  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.97  				|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.97  				| (68)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_1_1) = 0)
% 5.62/1.98  				| (69) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 5.62/1.98  				|
% 5.62/1.98  					| Combining equations (69,98) yields a new equation:
% 5.62/1.98  					| (95) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 5.62/1.98  					|
% 5.62/1.98  					| Equations (95) can reduce 72 to:
% 5.62/1.98  					| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.98  					|
% 5.62/1.98  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.98  			|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.98  			| (94)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 5.62/1.98  			| (95) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 5.62/1.98  			|
% 5.62/1.98  				| Equations (95) can reduce 72 to:
% 5.62/1.98  				| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.98  				|
% 5.62/1.98  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.98  		|-Branch two:
% 5.62/1.98  		| (69) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 5.62/1.98  		| (72)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 5.62/1.98  		|
% 5.62/1.98  			| Combining equations (69,98) yields a new equation:
% 5.62/1.98  			| (95) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 5.62/1.98  			|
% 5.62/1.98  			| Equations (95) can reduce 72 to:
% 5.62/1.98  			| (39) $false
% 5.62/1.98  			|
% 5.62/1.98  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 5.62/1.98  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 5.62/1.98  
% 5.62/1.98  1395ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------