TSTP Solution File: GEO179+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO179+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.51s 1.75s
% Output : Refutation 1.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO179+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:02:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 18 01:02:09 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4215.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.51/1.75 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.51/1.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 4 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 5 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 6 [ 1 0 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 7 [ 2 1 127 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 8 [ 2 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 9 [ 2 0 133 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 10 [ 3 1 229 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 11 [ 3 0 220 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 12 [ 3 1 2288 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 13 [ 4 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 14 [ 4 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 15 [ 5 1 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 16 [ 4 1 82 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 17 [ 5 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 18 [ 5 1 140 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 19 [ 39 1 468 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.37 sec ----> 98 [hyper,92,7,87,unit_del,1,1] {-} $F.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Length of proof is 15. Level of proof is 7.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.51/1.75 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.51/1.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 1.51/1.75 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 1.51/1.75 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,A).
% 1.51/1.75 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,B).
% 1.51/1.75 13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 1.51/1.75 15 [] {+} -distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c1,$c3))| -distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c1,$c2)).
% 1.51/1.75 16 [] {+} distinct_points($c3,$c2).
% 1.51/1.75 17 [] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 1.51/1.75 19 [hyper,17,13] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 1.51/1.75 21 [hyper,17,8,16] {+} distinct_points($c1,$c2).
% 1.51/1.75 22 [hyper,17,7,16] {+} distinct_points($c1,$c3).
% 1.51/1.75 23 [hyper,22,4] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c3,A).
% 1.51/1.75 24 [hyper,21,4] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 1.51/1.75 25 [hyper,23,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 1.51/1.75 31 [hyper,24,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 1.51/1.75 34 [hyper,19,15,19] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c1,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c1,$c3)).
% 1.51/1.75 52 [hyper,31,1] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c1).
% 1.51/1.75 57 [hyper,25,1] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points(A,$c1).
% 1.51/1.75 61 [hyper,52,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c1)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 1.51/1.75 63 [hyper,57,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c1)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 1.51/1.75 74 [hyper,61,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c1)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 1.51/1.75 87 [hyper,63,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c1)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 1.51/1.75 92 [hyper,34,7,74,unit_del,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c1,$c3)).
% 1.51/1.75 98 [hyper,92,7,87,unit_del,1,1] {-} $F.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.51/1.75 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 ============ end of search ============
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 true clauses given 2 (6.2%)
% 1.51/1.75 false clauses given 30
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 FALSE TRUE
% 1.51/1.75 5 1 0
% 1.51/1.75 9 3 0
% 1.51/1.75 11 0 2
% 1.51/1.75 12 18 0
% 1.51/1.75 19 0 1
% 1.51/1.75 22 0 6
% 1.51/1.75 25 0 13
% 1.51/1.75 tot: 22 22 (50.0% true)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Model 19 [ 39 1 468 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.51/1.75
% 1.51/1.75 Process 4215 finished Sat Jun 18 01:02:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------