TSTP Solution File: GEO179+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO179+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 08:46:01 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 96 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 33 ~; 37 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmplYNhRn/sel_GEO179+2.p_1',con1) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmplYNhRn/sel_GEO179+2.p_1',ceq2) ).
fof(5,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/tmp/tmplYNhRn/sel_GEO179+2.p_1',apart1) ).
fof(9,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X1))
& distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmplYNhRn/sel_GEO179+2.p_1',con) ).
fof(10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X1))
& distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[9]) ).
fof(11,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[5,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(13,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
| ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(14,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ( distinct_points(X6,X4)
& distinct_points(X6,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( distinct_points(X6,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) )
& ( distinct_points(X6,X5)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
( distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
cnf(17,plain,
( distinct_points(X3,X1)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(21,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| distinct_lines(X5,X6)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
fof(27,plain,
! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
fof(37,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& ( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X1))
| ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(38,negated_conjecture,
? [X4,X5,X6] :
( distinct_points(X4,X5)
& apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
& ( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X4,X5),line_connecting(X6,X4))
| ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X4,X5),line_connecting(X6,X5)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
fof(39,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0))
| ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[38]) ).
cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
| ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
cnf(42,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
cnf(45,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,41,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16,41,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(47,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[46,42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(48,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[47,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(49,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,41,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(50,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[49,42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[50,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(81,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0))
| ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[40,45,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(84,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[81,45,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(88,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,84,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(92,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[88,51,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(93,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[92,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(94,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[93,28,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(98,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[17,94,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(103,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[98,48,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(104,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[103,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(105,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[104,28,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(106,negated_conjecture,
$false,
105,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO179+2.p
% --creating new selector for [GEO008+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmplYNhRn/sel_GEO179+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem GEO179+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO179+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO179+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------