TSTP Solution File: GEO178+3 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 05:10:13 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  31   ~;  21   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (  30   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f79,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f68,f76,f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f72,f70]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f52,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.M1UDVB2AK9/Vampire---4.8_22516',ci1) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
      | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) )
    & apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f43,f50]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
          | ~ distinct_points(X2,X0) )
        & apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
   => ( ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
        | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) )
      & apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
      & distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
        | ~ distinct_points(X2,X0) )
      & apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
        | ~ distinct_points(X2,X0) )
      & apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
          & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
        & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.M1UDVB2AK9/Vampire---4.8_22516',con) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f63,f53,f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | apart_point_and_line(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
        | distinct_points(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.M1UDVB2AK9/Vampire---4.8_22516',ceq1) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0)
    | spl3_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    spl3_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f74,f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> distinct_points(sK2,sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    distinct_points(sK2,sK1),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f69,f53,f57]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f52,f55]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ~ distinct_points(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.M1UDVB2AK9/Vampire---4.8_22516',ci2) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( ~ spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f54,f65,f61]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 21:53:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.31  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.10/0.31  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.M1UDVB2AK9/Vampire---4.8_22516
% 0.61/0.79  % (22625)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22624)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22626)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22628)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22630)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22631)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22629)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.79  
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Memory used [KB]: 1101
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79  % (22629)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79  % (22628)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22631)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22624)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22626)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-22623"
% 0.61/0.79  % (22625)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.79  
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Memory used [KB]: 1107
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.79  % (22627)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.61/0.79  % (22623)Success in time 0.477 s
% 0.61/0.79  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------