TSTP Solution File: GEO178+3 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : GEO178+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:01:22 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.10s
% Output : Solution 1.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2633/GEO178+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2633/GEO178+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2633/GEO178+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 2729
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci1)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci2)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)=>(distinct_points(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ceq1)).
% fof(36, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)))=>(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(37, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)))=>(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[36])).
% fof(39, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)])).
% fof(40, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)])).
% fof(62, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[39])).
% fof(63, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[62])).
% cnf(64,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))|~distinct_points(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[63])).
% fof(65, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[40])).
% fof(66, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[65])).
% cnf(67,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))|~distinct_points(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% fof(68, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))|(distinct_points(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(69, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X4,X5))|(distinct_points(X4,X6)|apart_point_and_line(X6,X5))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[68])).
% cnf(70,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X1)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69])).
% fof(167, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)))&(~(distinct_points(X3,X1))|~(distinct_points(X3,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(168, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((distinct_points(X4,X5)&apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5)))&(~(distinct_points(X6,X4))|~(distinct_points(X6,X5)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[167])).
% fof(169, negated_conjecture,((distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)&apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)))&(~(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0))|~(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[168])).
% cnf(170,negated_conjecture,(~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)|~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(171,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(172,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(180,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|distinct_points(esk3_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[70,171,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(243,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[67,180,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(244,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[64,180,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(245,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[243,172,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(246,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[245,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(247,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[244,172,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(248,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[247,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(256,negated_conjecture,(~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[170,246,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(257,negated_conjecture,(~distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[256,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(259,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[257,248,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(260,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[259,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(261,negated_conjecture,($false),260,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 66
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 5
% # ...remaining for further processing: 61
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 1
% # Generated clauses : 72
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 58
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% # Paramodulations : 72
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 59
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 9
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 7
% # Non-unit-clauses : 43
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
% # ...number of literals in the above : 138
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index: 49 leaves, 1.71+/-1.498 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 24 leaves, 1.08+/-0.276 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 43 leaves, 1.49+/-0.973 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.017 s
% # System time : 0.003 s
% # Total time : 0.020 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.22 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.22 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2633/GEO178+3.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------