TSTP Solution File: GEO178+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.57s 2.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_17,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_28,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-j2ip4a_3/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X3,X1)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| distinct_points(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 19:10:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.57/2.28 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.57/2.28 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.57/2.28 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 6.57/2.28
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof found!
% 6.57/2.28 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.57/2.28 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object total steps : 16
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 6.57/2.28 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 6.57/2.28 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.57/2.28 # Parsed axioms : 49
% 6.57/2.28 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Initial clauses : 49
% 6.57/2.28 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 6.57/2.28 # Processed clauses : 54
% 6.57/2.28 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # ...subsumed : 4
% 6.57/2.28 # ...remaining for further processing : 49
% 6.57/2.28 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 6.57/2.28 # Generated clauses : 25
% 6.57/2.28 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 15
% 6.57/2.28 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 6.57/2.28 # Paramodulations : 25
% 6.57/2.28 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 6.57/2.28 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 6.57/2.28 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 6.57/2.28 # Non-unit-clauses : 36
% 6.57/2.28 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 6.57/2.28 # ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 6.57/2.28 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 6.57/2.28 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 265
% 6.57/2.28 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 143
% 6.57/2.28 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 6.57/2.28 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 6.57/2.28 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 6.57/2.28 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 6.57/2.28 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.57/2.28 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1268
% 6.57/2.28
% 6.57/2.28 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.57/2.28 # User time : 0.008 s
% 6.57/2.28 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.57/2.28 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 6.57/2.28 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 6.57/2.28 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 6.57/2.28 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 6.57/2.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------