TSTP Solution File: GEO178+3 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:46:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 5 unt; 19 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 20 ~; 12 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 30 ( 16 >; 14 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 13 ( 12 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn; 24 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_30,type,
orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
point: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_32,type,
line: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_34,type,
equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_35,type,
parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_36,type,
incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_37,type,
orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_38,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_40,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(ci1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
fof(ceq1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).
fof(ci2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X35,X36,X37] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X35,X36)
| distinct_points(X35,X37)
| apart_point_and_line(X37,X36) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq1])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ~ distinct_points(X23,X24)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X23,line_connecting(X23,X24)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| distinct_points(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X25,X26] :
( ~ distinct_points(X25,X26)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X26,line_connecting(X25,X26)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO178+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 19:49:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.011000 s
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59 % Total time : 0.014000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------