TSTP Solution File: GEO177+3 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO177+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 17.01s 4.63s
% Output   : Proof 34.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO177+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:48:19 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.61/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.61/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.61/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.61/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.61/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.61/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.61/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.61/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.61/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.61/0.59  
% 0.61/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.93/1.02  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.54/1.24  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.54/1.27  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.27/4.05  Prover 0: gave up
% 14.27/4.05  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 14.62/4.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 15.21/4.22  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.31/4.26  Prover 1: gave up
% 15.31/4.26  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 15.31/4.29  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 16.06/4.45  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 16.06/4.46  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.01/4.63  Prover 2: proved (374ms)
% 17.01/4.63  
% 17.01/4.63  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 17.01/4.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 17.01/4.63  
% 17.01/4.63  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 33.35/9.05  found it (size 1025)
% 33.35/9.05  
% 33.35/9.05  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 33.35/9.05  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 33.35/9.05  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v9 = 0) &  ~ (v8 = 0) & line_connecting(v2, v3) = v4 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v7) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v7) = v8 & distinct_points(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (equal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (equal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (equal_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (equal_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v10, v11) = v12) | distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12) | incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | parallel_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | equal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = v12) | equal_points(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (point(v12) = v11) |  ~ (point(v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line(v12) = v11) |  ~ (line(v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & point(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (equal_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & point(v12) = 0 & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & line(v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & line(v10) = v12))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & parallel_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & equal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0 & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & point(v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & point(v10) = v12))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & equal_points(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v10) = 0) &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : orthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : incident_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : parallel_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : equal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : equal_points(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : unorthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : intersection_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : line_connecting(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_points(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : point(v10) = v11 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : line(v10) = v11 & ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v4) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v4) = 0)))
% 33.76/9.14  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 yields:
% 33.76/9.14  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5 & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1 & ((all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0))
% 33.76/9.18  |
% 33.76/9.18  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 33.76/9.18  | (2)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 33.76/9.18  | (3) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5
% 33.76/9.18  | (4)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 33.76/9.18  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 33.76/9.18  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 33.76/9.18  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 33.76/9.18  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 33.76/9.19  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 33.76/9.19  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 33.76/9.19  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 33.76/9.19  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 33.76/9.19  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 33.76/9.19  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.19  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.19  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.19  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.19  | (25) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 34.13/9.19  | (26) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 34.13/9.19  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.19  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2)))
% 34.13/9.19  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.19  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 34.13/9.19  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (37) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 34.13/9.20  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.20  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))
% 34.13/9.20  | (40)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.20  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.20  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.20  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.20  | (45)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.20  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.20  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.20  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.20  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.20  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.20  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.20  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.21  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (60) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2
% 34.13/9.21  | (61)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.21  | (62)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1
% 34.13/9.21  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.21  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.21  | (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.21  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.21  | (70)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.21  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.21  | (73)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 34.13/9.21  | (75)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (78)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.21  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.21  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.21  | (82)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.21  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (84)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 34.13/9.21  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.21  | (87)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.21  | (88)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.21  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 34.13/9.21  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (91)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.22  | (93)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.22  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (95)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (97)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.22  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (103)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (104)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (105)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (106)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 34.13/9.22  | (108)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 34.13/9.22  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.22  | (110)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (113)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (114)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 34.13/9.22  | (115) (all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (116) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 34.13/9.22  | (117)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.22  | (118)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.22  | (119)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 34.13/9.22  | (120)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (121)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (122)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 34.13/9.22  | (124)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (125)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (126)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (127)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 34.13/9.22  | (128)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1
% 34.13/9.22  | (129)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (130)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (131)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 34.13/9.22  | (132)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.22  | (133)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (134)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.22  | (135)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.23  | (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (137)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 34.13/9.23  | (138)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  | (139)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (140)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.23  | (142)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 34.13/9.23  | (143)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 34.13/9.23  | (144)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 34.13/9.23  | (145)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (146)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (147)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.23  | (148)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (75) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (149)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (98) with all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (150)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (75) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (151)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (98) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (152)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (73) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (153) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (154) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (155) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (73) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (156) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (157) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (158) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (159)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, v0) = v1)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (137) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (160)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, v0) = v1)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (6) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (161)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, v0) = v1)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating formula (137) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (162)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, v0) = v1)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (152) with all_42_0_57 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (163) ( ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57) | ( ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_42_0_57)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (151) with all_43_0_58 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (164) ( ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58) | ( ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_0_58)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (150) with all_45_0_60 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (165) ( ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60) | ( ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_45_0_60)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (149) with all_47_0_62 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (166) ( ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62) | ( ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_62)
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (162) with all_49_0_65, all_49_1_66 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (167)  ~ (all_49_0_65 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_49_1_66 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_49_1_66) = all_49_0_65
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Applying alpha-rule on (167) yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (168)  ~ (all_49_0_65 = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (169) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_49_1_66
% 34.13/9.23  | (170) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_49_1_66) = all_49_0_65
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (159) with all_52_0_69, all_52_1_70 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (171)  ~ (all_52_0_69 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_52_1_70 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_52_1_70) = all_52_0_69
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Applying alpha-rule on (171) yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (172)  ~ (all_52_0_69 = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (173) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_52_1_70
% 34.13/9.23  | (174) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_52_1_70) = all_52_0_69
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Instantiating (160) with all_54_0_71, all_54_1_72 yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (175)  ~ (all_54_0_71 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_72 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_54_1_72) = all_54_0_71
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.23  | Applying alpha-rule on (175) yields:
% 34.13/9.23  | (176)  ~ (all_54_0_71 = 0)
% 34.13/9.23  | (177) line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_72
% 34.13/9.23  | (178) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_54_1_72) = all_54_0_71
% 34.13/9.23  |
% 34.13/9.24  | Instantiating (161) with all_56_0_73, all_56_1_74 yields:
% 34.13/9.24  | (179)  ~ (all_56_0_73 = 0) & line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_56_1_74 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_56_1_74) = all_56_0_73
% 34.13/9.24  |
% 34.13/9.24  | Applying alpha-rule on (179) yields:
% 34.13/9.24  | (180)  ~ (all_56_0_73 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  | (181) line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_56_1_74
% 34.13/9.24  | (182) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_56_1_74) = all_56_0_73
% 34.13/9.24  |
% 34.13/9.24  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  |-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  | (183)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60
% 34.13/9.24  |
% 34.13/9.24  	| Applying alpha-rule on (183) yields:
% 34.13/9.24  	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  	| (185) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60
% 34.13/9.24  	|
% 34.13/9.24  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  	|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  	| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  	|
% 34.13/9.24  		| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.13/9.24  		| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  		|
% 34.13/9.24  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  	|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  	| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  	| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  	|
% 34.13/9.24  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  		|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  		| (190)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58
% 34.13/9.24  		|
% 34.13/9.24  			| Applying alpha-rule on (190) yields:
% 34.13/9.24  			| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  			| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58
% 34.13/9.24  			|
% 34.13/9.24  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  			|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  			| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  			|
% 34.13/9.24  				| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.13/9.24  				| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  				|
% 34.13/9.24  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  			|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  			| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  			| (196)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  			|
% 34.13/9.24  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  				|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  				|
% 34.13/9.24  					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.13/9.24  					| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  					|
% 34.13/9.24  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  				|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  				| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  				|
% 34.13/9.24  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  					|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  					| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  					|
% 34.13/9.24  						| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.13/9.24  						| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  						|
% 34.13/9.24  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  					|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  					| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  					| (204)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  					|
% 34.13/9.24  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  						|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  						| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  						|
% 34.13/9.24  							| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.13/9.24  							| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  							|
% 34.13/9.24  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  						|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  						| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  						| (208)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  						|
% 34.13/9.24  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  							|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  							| (209)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57
% 34.13/9.24  							|
% 34.13/9.24  								| Applying alpha-rule on (209) yields:
% 34.13/9.24  								| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  								| (211) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57
% 34.13/9.24  								|
% 34.13/9.24  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  								|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  								| (212)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62
% 34.13/9.24  								|
% 34.13/9.24  									| Applying alpha-rule on (212) yields:
% 34.13/9.24  									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  									| (214) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62
% 34.13/9.24  									|
% 34.13/9.24  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  									|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  									| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  									|
% 34.13/9.24  										| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.13/9.24  										| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  										|
% 34.13/9.24  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  									|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  									| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  									| (218) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  									|
% 34.13/9.24  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.24  										|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.24  										| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.13/9.24  										|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.24  										|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.24  										| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  										| (222)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.24  										|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_54_1_72, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_72, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (223) all_54_1_72 = all_0_5_5
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_52_1_70, all_54_1_72 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_72, line_connecting(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_52_1_70, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (224) all_54_1_72 = all_52_1_70
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_56_1_74, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_56_1_74, line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (225) all_56_1_74 = all_0_2_2
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_49_1_66, all_56_1_74 and discharging atoms line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_56_1_74, line_connecting(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_49_1_66, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (226) all_56_1_74 = all_49_1_66
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Combining equations (225,226) yields a new equation:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (227) all_49_1_66 = all_0_2_2
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Combining equations (224,223) yields a new equation:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (228) all_52_1_70 = all_0_5_5
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Simplifying 228 yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (229) all_52_1_70 = all_0_5_5
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Combining equations (227,226) yields a new equation:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (225) all_56_1_74 = all_0_2_2
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| From (229) and (174) follows:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (231) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_52_0_69
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| From (223) and (178) follows:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (232) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_54_0_71
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| From (225) and (182) follows:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (233) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_73
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| From (227) and (170) follows:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (234) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_49_0_65
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_52_0_69, all_47_0_62 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_52_0_69, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (235) all_52_0_69 = all_47_0_62
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_54_0_71, all_45_0_60 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_54_0_71, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (236) all_54_0_71 = all_45_0_60
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_56_0_73, all_43_0_58 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_56_0_73, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (237) all_56_0_73 = all_43_0_58
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_49_0_65, all_42_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_49_0_65, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (238) all_49_0_65 = all_42_0_57
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Equations (237) can reduce 180 to:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.24  											| Equations (236) can reduce 176 to:
% 34.13/9.24  											| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.24  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Equations (235) can reduce 172 to:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Equations (238) can reduce 168 to:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| From (235) and (231) follows:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (214) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| From (236) and (232) follows:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (185) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| From (237) and (233) follows:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (192) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| From (238) and (234) follows:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (211) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (71) with all_0_0_0, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (247) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_47_0_62, all_0_0_0, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (248) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_0_0_0, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (249) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_47_0_62, all_0_0_0, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (250) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_0_0, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (251) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (252) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_47_0_62, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (253) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_0_1_1, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (254) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (71) with all_47_0_62, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (255) all_47_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_47_0_62, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (256) all_47_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_47_0_62, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (257) all_47_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_0_0_0, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (258) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_0_0, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (259) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_45_0_60, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (260) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_0_0_0, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (261) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (63) with all_45_0_60, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (262) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (63) with all_0_1_1, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (263) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_45_0_60, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (264) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_0_1_1, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (265) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_0_1_1, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (266) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (267) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (268) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_47_0_62, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (269) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.25  											| Instantiating formula (63) with all_45_0_60, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.13/9.25  											| (270) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.25  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_45_0_60, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (271) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (272) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_43_0_58, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (273) all_43_0_58 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_0_0, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (274) all_43_0_58 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_43_0_58, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (275) all_43_0_58 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (276) all_43_0_58 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_43_0_58, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (277) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_47_0_62, all_43_0_58, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (278) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_43_0_58, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (279) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_47_0_62, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (280) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_43_0_58, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (281) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_43_0_58, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (282) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_43_0_58, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (283) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_45_0_60, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (284) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_43_0_58, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (285) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_43_0_58, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (286) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (287) all_42_0_57 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_0_0, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (288) all_42_0_57 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (289) all_42_0_57 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_0_1_1, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (290) all_42_0_57 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_47_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (291) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_47_0_62, all_42_0_57, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (292) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_42_0_57, all_47_0_62, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (293) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_47_0_62, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (294) all_47_0_62 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_45_0_60, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (295) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_45_0_60, all_42_0_57, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (296) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.26  											|
% 34.13/9.26  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_42_0_57, all_45_0_60, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.26  											| (297) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  											| Instantiating formula (14) with all_45_0_60, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.27  											| (298) all_45_0_60 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_43_0_58, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.27  											| (299) all_43_0_58 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  											| Instantiating formula (73) with all_42_0_57, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.27  											| (300) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  											| Instantiating formula (84) with all_42_0_57, all_42_0_57, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, yields:
% 34.13/9.27  											| (301) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (115), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  											|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  											| (302) all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.13/9.27  											|
% 34.13/9.27  												| Applying alpha-rule on (302) yields:
% 34.13/9.27  												| (303) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  												| (304) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.13/9.27  												|
% 34.13/9.27  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  												|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  												|
% 34.13/9.27  													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  													| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  													|
% 34.13/9.27  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  												|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  												| (308)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  												|
% 34.13/9.27  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  													|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  													| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  													|
% 34.13/9.27  														| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.13/9.27  														| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  														|
% 34.13/9.27  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  													|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  													| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  													| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  													|
% 34.13/9.27  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  														|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  														|
% 34.13/9.27  															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  															| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  															|
% 34.13/9.27  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  														|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  														| (316) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  														|
% 34.13/9.27  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  															|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  															|
% 34.13/9.27  																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																|
% 34.13/9.27  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  															|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  															| (320) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  															|
% 34.13/9.27  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																|
% 34.13/9.27  																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																	| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																	|
% 34.13/9.27  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																| (324) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																|
% 34.13/9.27  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																	|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																	| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																	|
% 34.13/9.27  																		| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																		| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																		|
% 34.13/9.27  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																	|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																	| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																	| (328) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																	|
% 34.13/9.27  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																		|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																		| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																		|
% 34.13/9.27  																			| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																			| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																			|
% 34.13/9.27  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																		|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																		| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																		| (332) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																		|
% 34.13/9.27  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																			|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																			| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																			|
% 34.13/9.27  																				| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																				| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																				|
% 34.13/9.27  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																			|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																			| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																			| (336) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																			|
% 34.13/9.27  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																				|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																				| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																				|
% 34.13/9.27  																					| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																					| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																					|
% 34.13/9.27  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																				|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																				| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																				| (340) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																				|
% 34.13/9.27  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																					|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																					| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																					|
% 34.13/9.27  																						| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																						| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																						|
% 34.13/9.27  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																					|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																					| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.13/9.27  																					| (344) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.13/9.27  																					|
% 34.13/9.27  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 34.13/9.27  																						|-Branch one:
% 34.13/9.27  																						| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.13/9.27  																						|
% 34.13/9.27  																							| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.13/9.27  																							| (187) $false
% 34.13/9.27  																							|
% 34.13/9.27  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.13/9.27  																						|-Branch two:
% 34.13/9.27  																						| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																						| (348) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																						|
% 34.53/9.27  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																							|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																							| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																							|
% 34.53/9.27  																								| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																								| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																								|
% 34.53/9.27  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																							|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																							| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																							| (352) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																							|
% 34.53/9.27  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																								|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																								| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																								|
% 34.53/9.27  																									| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																									| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																									|
% 34.53/9.27  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																								|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																								| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																								| (356) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																								|
% 34.53/9.27  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																									|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																									| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																									|
% 34.53/9.27  																										| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																										| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																										|
% 34.53/9.27  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																									|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																									| (360) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																									|
% 34.53/9.27  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																										|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																										| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																										|
% 34.53/9.27  																											| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																											| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																											|
% 34.53/9.27  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																										|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																										| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																										| (364) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																										|
% 34.53/9.27  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																											|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																											| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																											|
% 34.53/9.27  																												| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																												| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																												|
% 34.53/9.27  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																											|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																											| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																											| (368) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.27  																											|
% 34.53/9.27  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.27  																												|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.27  																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.53/9.27  																												|
% 34.53/9.27  																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.53/9.27  																													| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.27  																													|
% 34.53/9.27  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.27  																												|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.27  																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.27  																												| (372) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																												|
% 34.53/9.28  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																													|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																													|
% 34.53/9.28  																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																														| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																														|
% 34.53/9.28  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																													|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																													| (376) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																													|
% 34.53/9.28  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																														|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																														| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																														|
% 34.53/9.28  																															| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																															| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																															|
% 34.53/9.28  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																														|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																														| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																														| (380) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																														|
% 34.53/9.28  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																															|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																															|
% 34.53/9.28  																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																|
% 34.53/9.28  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																															|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																															| (384) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																															|
% 34.53/9.28  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																|
% 34.53/9.28  																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																	| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																| (388) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																|
% 34.53/9.28  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|
% 34.53/9.28  																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																		| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																	| (392) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																	|
% 34.53/9.28  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																		| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|
% 34.53/9.28  																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																			| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																		| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																		| (308)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																		|
% 34.53/9.28  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																			| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|
% 34.53/9.28  																																				| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																				| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																			| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																			| (400)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																			|
% 34.53/9.28  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|
% 34.53/9.28  																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																					| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																				| (404)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																				|
% 34.53/9.28  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																					| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|
% 34.53/9.28  																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																						| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																					| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																					| (408)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																					|
% 34.53/9.28  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (336), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																						| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|
% 34.53/9.28  																																							| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																							| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																						| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																						| (412)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																						|
% 34.53/9.28  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																							| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|
% 34.53/9.28  																																								| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																								| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																							| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																							| (416)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																							|
% 34.53/9.28  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																								| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|
% 34.53/9.28  																																									| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																									| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																								| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																								| (420)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																								|
% 34.53/9.28  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.53/9.28  																																									| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|
% 34.53/9.28  																																										| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.53/9.28  																																										| (187) $false
% 34.53/9.28  																																										|
% 34.53/9.28  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.53/9.28  																																									| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.53/9.28  																																									| (424)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.53/9.28  																																									|
% 34.57/9.28  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (364), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																										| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																										|
% 34.57/9.28  																																											| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																											| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																										| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																										| (428)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																										|
% 34.57/9.28  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (372), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																											| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|
% 34.57/9.28  																																												| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																												| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																											| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																											| (432)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																											|
% 34.57/9.28  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (376), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																												| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|
% 34.57/9.28  																																													| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																												| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																												| (436)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																												|
% 34.57/9.28  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|
% 34.57/9.28  																																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																													| (440)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																													|
% 34.57/9.28  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																														| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|
% 34.57/9.28  																																															| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																														| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																														| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																														|
% 34.57/9.28  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (380), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																															| (448)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																															|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																																| (452)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																																|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	| (456) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																																	|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		| (460) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.28  																																																		|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.28  																																																			|
% 34.57/9.28  																																																				| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.28  																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																			| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																			| (464) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																			|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				| (468) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					| (472) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						| (476) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							| (480) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								| (484) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																								|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									| (488) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																									|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										| (492) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											| (496)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																											|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												| (500)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																												|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													| (504)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																													|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (492), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														| (508)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																														|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																															|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (456), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																| (400)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (460), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	| (404)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (464), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		| (524)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| Instantiating (524) with all_349_0_878 yields:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| (525) (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878) | ( ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_878)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (468), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			| (529)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																			|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| Instantiating (529) with all_353_0_879 yields:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| (530) (all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_353_0_879 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_879)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (472), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																				|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					| (538)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																					|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| Instantiating (538) with all_361_0_881 yields:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| (539) (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881) | ( ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_881)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (484), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						| (543)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																						|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							| (547)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																							|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (530), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								| (548) (all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																								|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																									| (549) all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																									|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (549) yields:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| (550) all_353_0_879 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| (551) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.29  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (348), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (571)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (579)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									| (586) all_353_0_879 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (586) yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (550) all_353_0_879 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (592)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (596)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (600) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (604) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (608) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (612) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (616)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, 0, all_45_0_60 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																								| (619)  ~ (all_353_0_879 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_879
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																								|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (619) yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									| (620)  ~ (all_353_0_879 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									| (621) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_879
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									| (622) (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																									|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (622), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										| (623) (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																										|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (623), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (624) all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (624) yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (625) all_361_0_881 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (626) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (630) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (634) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (638) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (642) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, 0, all_47_0_62 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											| (645) all_361_0_881 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																											|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (645) yields:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (625) all_361_0_881 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (551) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																												|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																													|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																														|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.30  																																																																															| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (348), into two cases.
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																		| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.57/9.31  																																																																																	| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (571)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (579)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																										| (682)  ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																										|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (682) yields:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											| (683)  ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											| (684) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											| (685) (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																											|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (685), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																												| (686) (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																												|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (686), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													| (687) all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (687) yields:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (688) all_349_0_878 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (476), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (701)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			| (713) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					| (721) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																							|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								| (733) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																								|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (713), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									| (737)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																									|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										| (741)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																										|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (721), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											| (745)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																											|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (733), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												| (749)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																												|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													| (752) all_349_0_878 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (752) yields:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (688) all_349_0_878 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														| (596)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															| (600) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.31  																																																																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| (604) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (608) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (612) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (616)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, 0, all_45_0_60 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																												| (781)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																												|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (781) yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| (782)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| (783) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																													|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																														|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															| (713) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																															|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																| (721) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	| (803) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																	|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		| (807)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																		|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (43) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_353_0_879, all_361_0_881 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_879, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (808) all_361_0_881 = all_353_0_879
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (43) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_349_0_878, all_361_0_881 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_881, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (809) all_361_0_881 = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Combining equations (808,809) yields a new equation:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (810) all_353_0_879 = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Simplifying 810 yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (811) all_353_0_879 = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Equations (811) can reduce 620 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (782)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| From (811) and (621) follows:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (783) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (100) with all_43_0_58, all_349_0_878, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (814) all_349_0_878 = 0 | all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (139) with all_349_0_878, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_878, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (815) all_349_0_878 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (815), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (816) apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (814), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (688) all_349_0_878 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					| Equations (688) can reduce 782 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (782)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (820) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (820), into two cases.
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					| (824)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																					|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, 0, all_43_0_58 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = all_43_0_58, apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (827)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			| (688) all_349_0_878 = 0
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																			|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| Equations (688) can reduce 782 to:
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|
% 34.67/9.32  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																											| (830)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_878
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (830) yields:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| (782)  ~ (all_349_0_878 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| (832) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_878
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_349_0_878, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_878, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| (688) all_349_0_878 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| Equations (688) can reduce 782 to:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																									| (835)  ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_881
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (835) yields:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| (683)  ~ (all_361_0_881 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| (837) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_881
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_361_0_881, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_881, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| (625) all_361_0_881 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| Equations (625) can reduce 683 to:
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.32  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  											| (840) all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.32  											|
% 34.74/9.32  												| Applying alpha-rule on (840) yields:
% 34.74/9.32  												| (841) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  												| (842) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.32  												|
% 34.74/9.32  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.32  												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.32  												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  												|
% 34.74/9.32  													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.32  													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  													|
% 34.74/9.32  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  												| (308)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.32  												|
% 34.74/9.32  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.32  													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.32  													| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  													|
% 34.74/9.32  														| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.32  														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  														|
% 34.74/9.32  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  													| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  													| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.32  													|
% 34.74/9.32  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (264), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.32  														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.32  														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  														|
% 34.74/9.32  															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.32  															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  															|
% 34.74/9.32  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  														| (316) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.32  														|
% 34.74/9.32  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (265), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.32  															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.32  															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.32  															|
% 34.74/9.32  																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.32  																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.32  																|
% 34.74/9.32  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.32  															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.32  															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.32  															| (320) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  															|
% 34.74/9.33  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (266), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																|
% 34.74/9.33  																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																| (324) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																|
% 34.74/9.33  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (268), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																	| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																		| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																	| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																	| (328) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (260), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																		| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																			| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																		| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																		| (332) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																			| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																				| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																			| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																			| (336) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (267), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																				| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																					| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																				| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																				| (340) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																					| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																						| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																					| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																					| (344) all_45_0_60 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																						| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																							| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																						| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																						| (348) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																							| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																								| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																							| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																							| (352) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																								| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																									| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																								| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																								| (356) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																									| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																										| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																									| (360) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																										| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																											| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																											|
% 34.74/9.33  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																										| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																										| (364) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																											| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																											|
% 34.74/9.33  																												| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																												|
% 34.74/9.33  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																											| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																											| (368) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																											|
% 34.74/9.33  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																												|
% 34.74/9.33  																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																													|
% 34.74/9.33  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																												| (372) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																												|
% 34.74/9.33  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																													|
% 34.74/9.33  																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																														|
% 34.74/9.33  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																													| (376) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																													|
% 34.74/9.33  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																														| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																														|
% 34.74/9.33  																															| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																															|
% 34.74/9.33  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																														| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																														| (380) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																														|
% 34.74/9.33  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																															|
% 34.74/9.33  																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																|
% 34.74/9.33  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																															| (384) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																															|
% 34.74/9.33  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																|
% 34.74/9.33  																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																| (388) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																|
% 34.74/9.33  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																	| (392) all_43_0_58 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																	|
% 34.74/9.33  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (256), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																		| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																		| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																		| (308)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																		|
% 34.74/9.33  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																			| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																																				| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																			| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																			| (400)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																			|
% 34.74/9.33  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																				| (404)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																				|
% 34.74/9.33  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																					| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																					| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																					| (408)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																					|
% 34.74/9.33  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (336), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																						| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																																							| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																						| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																						| (412)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																						|
% 34.74/9.33  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																							| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																																								| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																							| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																							| (416)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																							|
% 34.74/9.33  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																								| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																																									| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																								| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																								| (420)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																								|
% 34.74/9.33  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																									| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																																										| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																									| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																									| (424)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																									|
% 34.74/9.33  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (364), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																										| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																																											| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																											|
% 34.74/9.33  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																										| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																										| (428)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.33  																																										|
% 34.74/9.33  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (372), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.33  																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.33  																																											| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.33  																																											|
% 34.74/9.33  																																												| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.33  																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.33  																																												|
% 34.74/9.33  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.33  																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.33  																																											| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.33  																																											| (432)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																											|
% 34.74/9.34  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (376), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																												| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																												|
% 34.74/9.34  																																													| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																												| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																												| (436)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																												|
% 34.74/9.34  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (255), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																													| (440)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																														| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																															| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																														| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																														| (444)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (380), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																															| (448)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (384), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																| (452)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	| (456) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		| (460) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			| (464) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (247), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				| (468) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (254), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					| (472) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						| (476) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							| (480) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (250), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								| (484) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																								|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (251), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									| (488) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																									|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (252), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										| (492) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																										|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											| (496)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																											|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												| (500)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																												|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													| (504)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																													|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (492), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														| (508)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																														|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (368), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															| (512)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																															|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (456), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																| (400)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (460), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	| (404)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (464), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		| (524)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| Instantiating (524) with all_349_0_1982 yields:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| (1063) (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982) | ( ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_1982)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (468), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			| (529)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| Instantiating (529) with all_353_0_1983 yields:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| (1068) (all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_353_0_1983 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_1983)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (472), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				| (534)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					| (538)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| Instantiating (538) with all_361_0_1985 yields:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| (1077) (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985) | ( ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_1985)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (484), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						| (543)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							| (547)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1063), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								| (1086) (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982)
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1086), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.34  																																																																									| (1087) (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1087), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (1088) all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1088) yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (1089) all_349_0_1982 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (689) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (476), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (701)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (733) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (713) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			| (721) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (733), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				| (749)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					| (741)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (713), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						| (737)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (721), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							| (136)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							| (745)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| (186) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| Equations (186) can reduce 136 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (1145) all_349_0_1982 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1145) yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (1089) all_349_0_1982 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (592)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (596)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (600) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (604) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (608) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (612) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	| (616)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, 0, all_45_0_60 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																									| (1178)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1178) yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (1179)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (1180) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										| (189)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1077), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												| (1189) (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1189), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													| (1190) (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1190), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														| (1191) all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1191) yields:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (1192) all_361_0_1985 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (626) apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.35  																																																																															| (630) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (634) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (638) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (642) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, 0, all_47_0_62 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = all_47_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| (1212) all_361_0_1985 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1212) yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (1192) all_361_0_1985 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (551) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (733) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (579)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																													| (1245)  ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1245) yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| (1246)  ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| (1247) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1068), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| (1248) (all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1248), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (1249) all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1249) yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (1250) all_353_0_1983 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (551) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (575), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (17)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (579)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (193) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (193) can reduce 17 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (1278) all_353_0_1983 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1278) yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (1250) all_353_0_1983 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (588) apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																| (596)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	| (600) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		| (604) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			| (608) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				| (612) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					| (616)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, 0, all_45_0_60 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = all_45_0_60, apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														| (1307)  ~ (all_353_0_1983 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_1983
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1307) yields:
% 34.74/9.36  																																																																															| (1308)  ~ (all_353_0_1983 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															| (1309) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_1983
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															| (596)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	| (559)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		| (563) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			| (713) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				| (600) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					| (721) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							| (575) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								| (630) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									| (733) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										| (634) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											| (638) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												| (604) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													| (642) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														| (608) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																														|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															| (612) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																															|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																| (803) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (630), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	| (1385)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																	|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (634), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		| (1389)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																		|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (638), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			| (1393)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																			|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (604), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				| (1397)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																				|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (642), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					| (1401)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																					|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (608), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						| (1405)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																						|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (612), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							| (1409)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																							|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (803), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								| (1413)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (600), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.37  																																																																																																									| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																									| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																									| (1417)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (43) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_353_0_1983, all_361_0_1985 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_353_0_1983, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1418) all_361_0_1985 = all_353_0_1983
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (43) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_349_0_1982, all_361_0_1985 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_361_0_1985, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1419) all_361_0_1985 = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Combining equations (1418,1419) yields a new equation:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1420) all_353_0_1983 = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Simplifying 1420 yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1421) all_353_0_1983 = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Equations (1421) can reduce 1308 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1179)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| From (1421) and (1309) follows:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1180) distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (100) with all_42_0_57, all_349_0_1982, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1424) all_349_0_1982 = 0 | all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (139) with all_349_0_1982, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_349_0_1982, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1425) all_349_0_1982 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1425), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1426) apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1424), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											| (1089) all_349_0_1982 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												| Equations (1089) can reduce 1179 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											| (1179)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											| (1430) all_42_0_57 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1430), into two cases.
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												| (1434)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5) = v0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (19) with all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, 0, all_42_0_57 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = all_42_0_57, apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1437)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										| (1089) all_349_0_1982 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																										|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											| Equations (1089) can reduce 1179 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																												| (1440)  ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_1985
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																												|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1440) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| (1246)  ~ (all_361_0_1985 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| (1442) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_1985
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_361_0_1985, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_361_0_1985, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| (1192) all_361_0_1985 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| Equations (1192) can reduce 1246 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																								| (1445)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																								|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1445) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| (1179)  ~ (all_349_0_1982 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| (1447) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_1982
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_349_0_1982, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_349_0_1982, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| (1089) all_349_0_1982 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| Equations (1089) can reduce 1179 to:
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									|
% 34.74/9.38  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  								|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  								| (1450)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_62
% 34.74/9.38  								|
% 34.74/9.38  									| Applying alpha-rule on (1450) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  									| (213)  ~ (all_47_0_62 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  									| (1452) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_62
% 34.74/9.38  									|
% 34.74/9.38  									| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_47_0_62, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_62, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  									| (325) all_47_0_62 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  									|
% 34.74/9.38  									| Equations (325) can reduce 213 to:
% 34.74/9.38  									| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  									|
% 34.74/9.38  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  							|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  							| (1455)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_42_0_57
% 34.74/9.38  							|
% 34.74/9.38  								| Applying alpha-rule on (1455) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  								| (210)  ~ (all_42_0_57 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  								| (1457) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_42_0_57
% 34.74/9.38  								|
% 34.74/9.38  								| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_42_0_57, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_42_0_57, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  								| (552) all_42_0_57 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  								|
% 34.74/9.38  								| Equations (552) can reduce 210 to:
% 34.74/9.38  								| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  								|
% 34.74/9.38  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  		|-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  		| (1460)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_0_58
% 34.74/9.38  		|
% 34.74/9.38  			| Applying alpha-rule on (1460) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  			| (191)  ~ (all_43_0_58 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  			| (1462) distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_0_58
% 34.74/9.38  			|
% 34.74/9.38  			| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_43_0_58, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_0_58, distinct_points(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  			| (309) all_43_0_58 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  			|
% 34.74/9.38  			| Equations (309) can reduce 191 to:
% 34.74/9.38  			| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  			|
% 34.74/9.38  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  |-Branch two:
% 34.74/9.38  | (1465)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_45_0_60
% 34.74/9.38  |
% 34.74/9.38  	| Applying alpha-rule on (1465) yields:
% 34.74/9.38  	| (184)  ~ (all_45_0_60 = 0)
% 34.74/9.38  	| (1467) distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_45_0_60
% 34.74/9.38  	|
% 34.74/9.38  	| Instantiating formula (138) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_45_0_60, 0 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_45_0_60, distinct_points(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 34.74/9.38  	| (305) all_45_0_60 = 0
% 34.74/9.38  	|
% 34.74/9.38  	| Equations (305) can reduce 184 to:
% 34.74/9.38  	| (187) $false
% 34.74/9.38  	|
% 34.74/9.38  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 34.74/9.38  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 34.74/9.38  
% 34.74/9.38  8772ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------