TSTP Solution File: GEO177+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO177+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s 0.68s
% Output   : Refutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO177+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 17:55:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.50/0.68  
% 0.50/0.68  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.50/0.68  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.50/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.50/0.68  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.50/0.68  SPASS derived 1396 clauses, backtracked 85 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 522 clauses.
% 0.50/0.68  SPASS allocated 85796 KBytes.
% 0.50/0.68  SPASS spent	0:00:00.33 on the problem.
% 0.50/0.68  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.50/0.68  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.50/0.68  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 0.50/0.68  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.50/0.68  		0:00:00.21 for the reduction.
% 0.50/0.68  
% 0.50/0.68  
% 0.50/0.68  Here is a proof with depth 10, length 59 :
% 0.50/0.68  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.50/0.68  1[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc7,skc6)*.
% 0.50/0.68  2[0:Inp] ||  -> distinct_points(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.50/0.68  3[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,u)* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  6[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  7[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  9[0:Inp] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc4,skc5)).
% 0.50/0.68  10[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v)*+ -> distinct_points(v,w)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.50/0.68  13[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> apart_point_and_line(w,v)* distinct_points(u,w)*.
% 0.50/0.68  14[0:Inp] || apart_point_and_line(u,v)*+ -> distinct_lines(v,w)* apart_point_and_line(u,w)*.
% 0.50/0.68  15[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,u).
% 0.50/0.68  16[0:Inp] || distinct_points(u,v) apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))* -> distinct_points(w,v).
% 0.50/0.68  19[0:Inp] || distinct_lines(u,v)*+ distinct_points(w,x)* -> apart_point_and_line(x,u)* apart_point_and_line(x,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,v)* apart_point_and_line(w,u)*.
% 0.50/0.68  20[0:Res:2.0,19.0] || distinct_lines(u,v)* -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) apart_point_and_line(skc5,v) apart_point_and_line(skc4,v) apart_point_and_line(skc4,u).
% 0.50/0.68  21[0:Res:2.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u) distinct_points(skc4,u)*.
% 0.50/0.68  22[0:Res:2.0,15.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* -> distinct_points(u,skc4).
% 0.50/0.68  25[0:Res:1.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc6,u)* distinct_points(skc7,u).
% 0.50/0.68  26[0:Res:1.0,15.1] || apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))* -> distinct_points(u,skc7).
% 0.50/0.68  47[0:Res:9.0,22.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* distinct_points(skc6,skc4).
% 0.50/0.68  49[1:Spt:47.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  59[0:Res:21.1,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc4,v)*.
% 0.50/0.68  64[1:Res:49.0,13.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* distinct_points(skc7,u).
% 0.50/0.68  76[1:Res:64.0,14.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc7,u) distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc4,skc5),v)* apart_point_and_line(u,v)*.
% 0.50/0.68  93[0:Res:59.2,3.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc5,u)* distinct_points(u,skc4)*.
% 0.50/0.68  97[0:Res:93.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(u,v)* distinct_points(skc5,v)*.
% 0.50/0.68  170[0:Res:97.2,3.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc4)* distinct_points(u,skc5).
% 0.50/0.68  176[0:Res:170.0,10.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc5)* distinct_points(skc4,v)* distinct_points(u,v)*.
% 0.50/0.68  230[0:Res:176.2,3.0] ||  -> distinct_points(u,skc5)* distinct_points(skc4,u)*.
% 0.50/0.68  302[1:Res:76.2,26.0] ||  -> distinct_points(skc7,u)* distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc4,skc5),line_connecting(skc7,skc6))* distinct_points(u,skc7)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1119[2:Spt:302.0,302.2] ||  -> distinct_points(skc7,u)* distinct_points(u,skc7)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1120[2:Fac:1119.0,1119.1] ||  -> distinct_points(skc7,skc7)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1123[2:MRR:1120.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1125[2:Spt:1123.0,302.1] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc4,skc5),line_connecting(skc7,skc6))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1126[2:Res:1125.0,20.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1134[2:MRR:1126.1,1126.2,7.0,6.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1202[3:Spt:1134.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1206[3:Res:1202.0,16.1] || distinct_points(skc4,skc5)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.50/0.68  1213[3:MRR:1206.0,1206.1,230.1,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1214[3:Spt:1213.0,1134.0,1202.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1215[3:Spt:1213.0,1134.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1220[3:Res:1215.0,15.1] || distinct_points(skc4,skc5) -> distinct_points(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1228[3:MRR:1220.0,1220.1,230.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1229[1:Spt:1228.0,47.0,49.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1230[1:Spt:1228.0,47.1] ||  -> distinct_points(skc6,skc4)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1232[1:MRR:9.1,1229.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1239[1:Res:1232.0,14.0] ||  -> distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc4,skc5),u)* apart_point_and_line(skc6,u).
% 0.50/0.68  1242[1:Res:1239.0,20.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,u) apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)* apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1542[2:Spt:1242.0,1242.2,1242.3] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,u) apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) apart_point_and_line(skc4,u)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1543[2:Res:1542.2,6.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1557[2:MRR:1543.1,7.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1566[2:Res:1557.0,16.1] || distinct_points(skc7,skc6) -> distinct_points(skc6,skc6)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1570[2:MRR:1566.0,1566.1,25.1,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1571[2:Spt:1570.0,1242.1,1242.4] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5)) apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1572[3:Spt:1571.0] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1576[3:Res:1572.0,16.1] || distinct_points(skc4,skc5)* -> distinct_points(skc5,skc5).
% 0.50/0.68  1583[3:MRR:1576.0,1576.1,230.1,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1584[3:Spt:1583.0,1571.0,1572.0] || apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))* -> .
% 0.50/0.68  1585[3:Spt:1583.0,1571.1] ||  -> apart_point_and_line(skc4,line_connecting(skc4,skc5))*.
% 0.50/0.68  1594[3:Res:1585.0,15.1] || distinct_points(skc4,skc5) -> distinct_points(skc4,skc4)*.
% 0.50/0.68  1602[3:MRR:1594.0,1594.1,230.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.50/0.68  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.50/0.68  Formulae used in the proof : con apart1 apart4 ceq1 ceq2 con1 cu1
% 0.50/0.68  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------