TSTP Solution File: GEO177+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO177+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 108.13s 108.34s
% Output : Refutation 108.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO177+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 23:35:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Fri Jun 17 23:35:58 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11018.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Changing weight limit from 60 to 40.
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 69.81/70.07
% 69.81/70.07 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 115 givens.
% 69.81/70.07
% 91.33/91.59
% 91.33/91.59
% 91.33/91.59 Changing weight limit from 40 to 37.
% 91.33/91.59
% 91.33/91.59 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 120 givens.
% 91.33/91.59
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Model 4 [ 4 1 538 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 107.94 sec ----> 4241 [binary,4240.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Length of proof is 26. Level of proof is 13.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 108.13/108.34 % SZS status Theorem
% 108.13/108.34 % SZS output start Refutation
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 108.13/108.34 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 108.13/108.34 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 108.13/108.34 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 108.13/108.34 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 108.13/108.34 13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 108.13/108.34 15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 108.13/108.34 16 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c4,$c3)).
% 108.13/108.34 17 [] {+} distinct_points($c4,$c3).
% 108.13/108.34 18 [] {+} distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 108.13/108.34 19 [] {-} apart_point_and_line($c4,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 20 [hyper,17,4] {+} distinct_points($c4,A)|distinct_points($c3,A).
% 108.13/108.34 21 [hyper,18,4] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c1,A).
% 108.13/108.34 22 [hyper,20,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c4,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 108.13/108.34 25 [hyper,19,13] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A)|apart_point_and_line($c4,A).
% 108.13/108.34 29 [hyper,21,4] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 108.13/108.34 30 [hyper,21,1] {+} distinct_points($c1,$c2).
% 108.13/108.34 34 [hyper,25,11,18] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c4,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 108.13/108.34 48 [hyper,22,1] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points(A,$c4).
% 108.13/108.34 49 [hyper,22,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c4,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 108.13/108.34 50 [factor,49.1.3,unit_del,1] {+} distinct_points($c4,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 108.13/108.34 53 [hyper,48,4] {+} distinct_points(A,$c4)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 108.13/108.34 112 [hyper,29,1] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 108.13/108.34 119 [hyper,29,4] {+} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 108.13/108.34 136 [factor,119.1.3,unit_del,1] {+} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c1).
% 108.13/108.34 147 [hyper,112,4] {+} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 108.13/108.34 368 [hyper,53,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c4)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 108.13/108.34 511 [hyper,34,7,368,unit_del,15,16,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 527 [hyper,511,7,136,unit_del,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 538 [hyper,527,8,136,unit_del,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 540 [hyper,538,13] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c1),A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,A).
% 108.13/108.34 549 [hyper,540,11,30] {-} apart_point_and_line($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A).
% 108.13/108.34 717 [hyper,147,4] {+} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c1,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 108.13/108.34 3424 [hyper,717,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c1).
% 108.13/108.34 4221 [hyper,549,8,50,unit_del,16,15,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 4233 [hyper,4221,8,3424,unit_del,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c1)).
% 108.13/108.34 4240 [hyper,4233,7,3424,factor_simp] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 108.13/108.34 4241 [binary,4240.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 % SZS output end Refutation
% 108.13/108.34 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 ============ end of search ============
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 true clauses given 39 (30.2%)
% 108.13/108.34 false clauses given 90
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 FALSE TRUE
% 108.13/108.34 5 0 1
% 108.13/108.34 12 8 0
% 108.13/108.34 15 28 0
% 108.13/108.34 20 0 46
% 108.13/108.34 23 0 20
% 108.13/108.34 25 0 3
% 108.13/108.34 26 0 109
% 108.13/108.34 28 0 19
% 108.13/108.34 29 0 352
% 108.13/108.34 31 0 62
% 108.13/108.34 32 0 684
% 108.13/108.34 34 0 204
% 108.13/108.34 35 0 693
% 108.13/108.34 37 0 87
% 108.13/108.34 tot: 36 2280 (98.4% true)
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Model 4 [ 4 1 538 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 108.13/108.34
% 108.13/108.34 Process 11018 finished Fri Jun 17 23:37:46 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------