TSTP Solution File: GEO176+2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : GEO176+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:08:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  22   ~;  20   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  30   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f103,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f67,f100,f102]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f101]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f88,f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    convergent_lines(sK3,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ? [X3,X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X3,X0) )
      & distinct_points(X3,X1)
      & ~ distinct_points(X3,intersection_point(X2,X0))
      & convergent_lines(X2,X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ? [X2,X1,X0,X3] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X3,intersection_point(X2,X0))
      & distinct_points(X3,X1)
      & ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X3,X0) )
      & convergent_lines(X2,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ~ ! [X2,X1,X0,X3] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(X3,X0) )
          & convergent_lines(X2,X0) )
       => distinct_points(X3,intersection_point(X2,X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X1,X3,X0] :
        ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
            | apart_point_and_line(X0,X4) )
          & distinct_points(X0,X1)
          & convergent_lines(X3,X4) )
       => distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X1,X3,X0] :
      ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X3)
          | apart_point_and_line(X0,X4) )
        & distinct_points(X0,X1)
        & convergent_lines(X3,X4) )
     => distinct_points(X0,intersection_point(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(sK3,sK1)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f66,f53,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X2)
      | distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X0,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X0] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X0,X2)
      | distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X0,X2))
      | ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X0)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X0,X2))
      | ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X0)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) )
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X2)
     => ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X0)
          | apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) )
       => distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X0,X2)) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X2,X1] :
      ( convergent_lines(X0,X1)
     => ( ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
          | apart_point_and_line(X2,X0) )
       => distinct_points(X2,intersection_point(X0,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con2) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,intersection_point(sK3,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ~ spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f87,f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f52,f53,f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X0)
      | distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X0,X2))
      | ~ convergent_lines(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f51,f64,f60]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK1)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GEO176+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 21:21:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (22621)lrs+10_1:1024_nm=0:nwc=5.0:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (22637)dis+1010_1:1_bs=on:ep=RS:erd=off:newcnf=on:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sgt=32:ss=axioms:i=30:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/30Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (22625)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.20/0.52  % (22625)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.53  % (22621)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.53  % (22621)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (22621)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53  % (22637)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Time elapsed: 0.110 s
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (22625)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (22614)Success in time 0.181 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------