TSTP Solution File: GEO175+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO175+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12 % Problem : GEO175+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:02:11 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.65 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.65 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.65 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.65 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 % Result :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.21/0.65 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.21/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 % File : GEO175+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.21/0.65 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.21/0.65 % Problem : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.21/0.65 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.21/0.65 % English : If two lines are convergent and a point is distinct from the
% 0.21/0.65 % intersection point then this point is apart from at least one of
% 0.21/0.65 % these lines.
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.21/0.65 % : [Li97] Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.21/0.65 % : [Li98] Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.21/0.65 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.21/0.65 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.21/0.65 % Names :
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 % Status : Theorem
% 0.21/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.21/0.65 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% 0.21/0.65 % Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% 0.21/0.65 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg)
% 0.21/0.65 % Number of connectives : 29 ( 3 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% 0.21/0.65 % ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.65 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.21/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.65 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.65 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.65 % Number of variables : 34 ( 34 !; 0 ?)
% 0.21/0.65 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.21/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.21/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.21/0.65 ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.21/0.65 ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.65 & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 0.21/0.65 & distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V)) )
% 0.21/0.65 => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 0.21/0.65 | apart_point_and_line(X,V) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.65 %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.65 %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.21/0.65 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.21/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.65 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.21/0.65 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5
% 0.21/0.65 %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 0.21/0.65 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.21/0.65 [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.21/0.65 [4]~P3(a1,a3)
% 0.21/0.65 [5]~P3(a1,a4)
% 0.21/0.65 [3]P1(a1,f5(a3,a4))
% 0.21/0.65 [6]~P1(x61,x61)
% 0.21/0.65 [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 0.21/0.65 [8]~P2(x81,x81)
% 0.21/0.65 [9]~P2(x91,x92)+P4(x91,x92)
% 0.21/0.65 [10]~P1(x103,x101)+P1(x101,x102)+P1(x103,x102)
% 0.21/0.65 [11]~P3(x111,x113)+P1(x111,x112)+P3(x112,x113)
% 0.21/0.65 [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 0.21/0.65 [13]~P3(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P3(x133,x132)
% 0.21/0.65 [14]~P2(x143,x141)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x142)
% 0.21/0.65 [15]~P2(x152,x153)+~P3(x151,x153)+P1(x151,f5(x152,x153))
% 0.21/0.65 [16]~P2(x162,x163)+~P3(x161,x162)+P1(x161,f5(x162,x163))
% 0.21/0.65 [17]P1(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x172)+~P3(x171,f6(x173,x172))
% 0.21/0.65 [18]P1(x181,x182)+~P1(x182,x183)+~P3(x181,f6(x182,x183))
% 0.21/0.65 [19]P3(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P4(x193,x192)+P3(x191,x192)+P3(x191,x193)+P3(x194,x192)
% 0.21/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.65
% 0.21/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (~P1(x231,x231)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(rename_variables,[],[6])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (~P3(f5(a3,a4),a3)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,23,8,2,14,10,16])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (~P1(x261,x261)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(rename_variables,[],[6])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (~P3(f5(a3,a4),a4)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,23,26,8,2,14,10,16,15])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(31,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (P4(a3,a4)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,23,26,8,2,14,10,16,15,9])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (P4(a4,a3)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,31,12])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 (~P1(f5(a3,a4),a1)),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,28,25,39,19])).
% 0.21/0.66 cnf(60,plain,
% 0.21/0.66 ($false),
% 0.21/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,6,57,10]),
% 0.21/0.66 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.66 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.66 % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------