TSTP Solution File: GEO174+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.92s 2.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 7 unt; 7 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_29,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_20,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dj76hfuw/input.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_42])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:22:45 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.17/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.17/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.92/2.25 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.92/2.25 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.92/2.25 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 6.92/2.25
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof found!
% 6.92/2.25 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.92/2.25 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object clause steps : 12
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 6.92/2.25 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.92/2.25 # Parsed axioms : 50
% 6.92/2.25 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Initial clauses : 50
% 6.92/2.25 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 6.92/2.25 # Processed clauses : 75
% 6.92/2.25 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # ...subsumed : 7
% 6.92/2.25 # ...remaining for further processing : 68
% 6.92/2.25 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 6.92/2.25 # Generated clauses : 136
% 6.92/2.25 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 113
% 6.92/2.25 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 6.92/2.25 # Paramodulations : 130
% 6.92/2.25 # Factorizations : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Current number of processed clauses : 63
% 6.92/2.25 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 6.92/2.25 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 6.92/2.25 # Non-unit-clauses : 49
% 6.92/2.25 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74
% 6.92/2.25 # ...number of literals in the above : 262
% 6.92/2.25 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 6.92/2.25 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 368
% 6.92/2.25 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 228
% 6.92/2.25 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 6.92/2.25 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 6.92/2.25 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 6.92/2.25 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 6.92/2.25 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.92/2.25 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2348
% 6.92/2.25
% 6.92/2.25 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.92/2.25 # User time : 0.017 s
% 6.92/2.25 # System time : 0.005 s
% 6.92/2.25 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 6.92/2.25 # ...preprocessing : 0.018 s
% 6.92/2.25 # ...main loop : 0.004 s
% 6.92/2.25 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.92/2.25
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------