TSTP Solution File: GEO174+3 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:46:41 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.48s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   24
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (   5 unt;  20 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  17   ~;  17   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn;  26   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X4,X5)
        & ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
          | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) )
     => distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X4,X5)
          & ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
            | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) )
       => distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X38,X39)
      | distinct_lines(X39,X40)
      | apart_point_and_line(X38,X40) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) )
    & ~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X23,X24)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X23,line_connecting(X23,X24)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X25,X26)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X26,line_connecting(X25,X26)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 22:45:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.48/0.59  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.48/0.60  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.48/0.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.48/0.61  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.48/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.48/0.61  % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------