TSTP Solution File: GEO174+3 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:58:55 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.43/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.68 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.58/0.68 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.68 % Transform :cnf
% 0.58/0.68 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.58/0.68 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.58/0.68
% 0.58/0.68 % Result :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.58/0.68 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.58/0.68 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.68 % File : GEO174+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.58/0.68 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.58/0.68 % Problem : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.58/0.68 % Version : [vPl95] axioms.
% 0.58/0.68 % English : If two points are distinct and a line U is apart from at least
% 0.58/0.68 % one of these points, then this line is distinct from the line
% 0.58/0.68 % connecting these points
% 0.58/0.68
% 0.58/0.68 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.58/0.68 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.58/0.68 % : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.68 % Source : [Rat07]
% 0.58/0.68 % Names : Lemma 4.1.i [vPl95]
% 0.58/0.68
% 0.58/0.68 % Status : Theorem
% 0.58/0.68 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.21 v5.4.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0
% 0.58/0.68 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% 0.58/0.68 % Number of atoms : 98 ( 0 equ)
% 0.58/0.68 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.58/0.68 % Number of connectives : 90 ( 28 ~; 20 |; 15 &)
% 0.58/0.68 % ( 5 <=>; 22 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.68 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.58/0.68 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.58/0.68 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.68 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.68 % Number of variables : 85 ( 85 !; 0 ?)
% 0.58/0.68 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.58/0.68
% 0.58/0.68 % Comments :
% 0.58/0.68 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+1.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+5.ax').
% 0.58/0.68 include('Axioms/GEO006+6.ax').
% 0.58/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.69 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.58/0.69 ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.58/0.69 ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.58/0.69 & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 0.58/0.69 & ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 0.58/0.69 | apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) )
% 0.58/0.69 => distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.58/0.69
% 0.58/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.69 % Proof found
% 0.58/0.69 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.69 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.58/0.69 %ClaNum:50(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.58/0.69 %VarNum:218(SingletonVarNum:98)
% 0.58/0.69 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.58/0.69 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.58/0.69 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.58/0.69 %goalClause: 1 2 6 11
% 0.58/0.69 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.58/0.69 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.58/0.69 [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.58/0.69 [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.58/0.69 [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.58/0.69 [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.58/0.69 [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 0.58/0.69 [7]~P3(x71,f7(x72,x71))
% 0.58/0.69 [8]~P3(x81,f8(x82,x81))
% 0.58/0.69 [9]~P2(f7(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.58/0.69 [10]~P5(f8(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.58/0.69 [11]P3(a1,a3)+P3(a2,a3)
% 0.58/0.69 [12]P6(x121,x122)+P1(x121,x122)
% 0.58/0.69 [13]P7(x131,x132)+P4(x131,x132)
% 0.58/0.69 [15]P5(x151,x152)+P2(x151,x152)
% 0.58/0.69 [16]P8(x161,x162)+P2(x161,x162)
% 0.58/0.69 [17]P9(x171,x172)+P3(x171,x172)
% 0.58/0.69 [18]P10(x181,x182)+P5(x181,x182)
% 0.58/0.69 [19]~P4(x191,x192)+P2(x191,x192)
% 0.58/0.69 [22]~P6(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x222)
% 0.58/0.69 [23]~P7(x231,x232)+~P4(x231,x232)
% 0.58/0.69 [24]~P8(x241,x242)+~P2(x241,x242)
% 0.58/0.69 [25]~P9(x251,x252)+~P3(x251,x252)
% 0.58/0.69 [26]~P10(x261,x262)+~P5(x261,x262)
% 0.58/0.69 [46]~P1(x461,x462)+~P3(x462,f5(x461,x462))
% 0.58/0.69 [47]~P1(x471,x472)+~P3(x471,f5(x471,x472))
% 0.58/0.69 [48]~P2(x481,x482)+~P3(f6(x481,x482),x482)
% 0.58/0.69 [49]~P2(x491,x492)+~P3(f6(x491,x492),x491)
% 0.58/0.69 [20]~P12(x202)+~P11(x201)+P11(f7(x201,x202))
% 0.58/0.69 [21]~P12(x212)+~P11(x211)+P11(f8(x211,x212))
% 0.58/0.69 [27]~P1(x273,x271)+P1(x271,x272)+P1(x273,x272)
% 0.58/0.69 [28]~P3(x281,x283)+P1(x281,x282)+P3(x282,x283)
% 0.58/0.69 [29]~P4(x293,x291)+P4(x291,x292)+P4(x293,x292)
% 0.58/0.69 [30]~P2(x303,x301)+P4(x301,x302)+P2(x303,x302)
% 0.58/0.69 [31]~P3(x313,x311)+P4(x311,x312)+P3(x313,x312)
% 0.58/0.69 [32]~P2(x323,x321)+P2(x321,x322)+P2(x323,x322)
% 0.58/0.69 [33]~P2(x333,x332)+P5(x331,x332)+P5(x331,x333)
% 0.58/0.69 [35]~P11(x352)+~P11(x351)+~P2(x351,x352)+P12(f6(x351,x352))
% 0.58/0.69 [36]~P12(x362)+~P12(x361)+~P1(x361,x362)+P11(f5(x361,x362))
% 0.58/0.69 [38]~P2(x381,x383)+~P5(x381,x383)+P2(x381,x382)+P5(x383,x382)
% 0.58/0.69 [39]~P2(x392,x393)+~P5(x392,x393)+P2(x391,x392)+P2(x391,x393)
% 0.58/0.69 [40]~P2(x402,x403)+~P5(x402,x403)+P2(x401,x402)+P5(x401,x403)
% 0.58/0.69 [41]~P2(x413,x411)+~P5(x413,x411)+P2(x411,x412)+P5(x413,x412)
% 0.58/0.69 [42]~P2(x423,x422)+~P5(x423,x422)+P2(x421,x422)+P5(x421,x423)
% 0.58/0.69 [43]~P2(x431,x433)+~P5(x431,x433)+P5(x431,x432)+P5(x433,x432)
% 0.58/0.69 [45]P5(x453,x454)+~P4(x453,x452)+P3(x451,x452)+P3(x451,x453)+P5(x452,x454)
% 0.58/0.69 [50]P3(x504,x503)+~P1(x504,x501)+~P4(x503,x502)+P3(x501,x502)+P3(x501,x503)+P3(x504,x502)
% 0.58/0.69 %EqnAxiom
% 0.58/0.69
% 0.58/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (~P5(f8(x681,x682),x681)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(rename_variables,[],[10])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(70,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (P2(a4,a3)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,2,7,9,10,24,22,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(71,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (~P2(x711,x711)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(73,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (P4(a4,a3)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,71,2,7,9,10,24,22,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(86,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (~P3(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,71,2,7,9,10,24,22,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30,29,27,49,48,47,46])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(94,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (~P3(a1,a3)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,71,2,6,7,9,10,68,24,22,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30,29,27,49,48,47,46,42,26,23,31])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(110,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[94,11])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(117,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 (~P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,10,70,86,73,15,30,29,31])).
% 0.58/0.69 cnf(146,plain,
% 0.58/0.69 ($false),
% 0.58/0.69 inference(scs_inference,[],[110,117]),
% 0.58/0.69 ['proof']).
% 0.69/0.69 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.69/0.69 % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------