TSTP Solution File: GEO174+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc7,skc6),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ distinct_points(u,u),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4) ),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))
    | distinct_points(w,u) ),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(w,line_connecting(u,v))
    | distinct_points(w,v) ),
    file('GEO174+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
    | distinct_points(u,skc7) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,14]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,14.1')] ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
    | distinct_points(u,skc6) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,15]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,15.1')] ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,skc4)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:13.2,7.0')] ).

cnf(70,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,skc4)
    | distinct_points(u,skc6) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[30,26]),
    [iquote('0:Res:30.1,26.0')] ).

cnf(71,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4)
    | distinct_points(skc6,skc6) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,70]),
    [iquote('0:Res:6.0,70.0')] ).

cnf(72,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[71,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:71.1,3.0')] ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(skc4,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc7,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[72,13]),
    [iquote('0:Res:72.0,13.0')] ).

cnf(77,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[75,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:75.0,7.0')] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    distinct_points(skc7,skc7),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[77,25]),
    [iquote('0:Res:77.0,25.0')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[105,3]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:105.0,3.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:33:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS derived 86 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 79 clauses.
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS allocated 85147 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 17 :
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : con apart1 ceq2 con1
% 0.19/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------