TSTP Solution File: GEO173+3 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GEO173+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.43s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
distinct_points(skc7,skc6),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(33,axiom,
( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(34,axiom,
( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(51,axiom,
( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
| ~ distinct_points(w,x)
| apart_point_and_line(x,u)
| apart_point_and_line(x,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
file('GEO173+3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(64,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,33]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,33.0')] ).
cnf(65,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,34]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,34.0')] ).
cnf(89,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
| apart_point_and_line(v,skc4)
| apart_point_and_line(u,skc4)
| apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
| apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,51]),
[iquote('0:Res:8.0,51.1')] ).
cnf(92,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4)
| apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
| apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
| apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,89]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,89.0')] ).
cnf(139,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[92,3,64,65,4]),
[iquote('0:MRR:92.0,92.1,92.2,92.3,3.0,64.0,65.0,4.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : GEO173+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:20:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.43 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.43 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43 SPASS derived 70 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 91 clauses.
% 0.18/0.43 SPASS allocated 97754 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.43 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.43 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.43 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.43 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43
% 0.18/0.43 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 12 :
% 0.18/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.43 Formulae used in the proof : con ci1 ci2 cu1
% 0.18/0.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------