TSTP Solution File: GEO173+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GEO173+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
distinct_points(skc7,skc6),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(19,axiom,
( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
| ~ distinct_points(w,x)
| apart_point_and_line(x,u)
| apart_point_and_line(x,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
file('GEO173+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(24,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
| apart_point_and_line(skc6,u)
| apart_point_and_line(skc6,v)
| apart_point_and_line(skc7,v)
| apart_point_and_line(skc7,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,19]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,19.0')] ).
cnf(26,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,12]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,12.0')] ).
cnf(27,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6)),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,13]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,13.0')] ).
cnf(226,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(skc6,skc4)
| apart_point_and_line(skc6,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
| apart_point_and_line(skc7,line_connecting(skc7,skc6))
| apart_point_and_line(skc7,skc4) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8,24]),
[iquote('0:Res:8.0,24.0')] ).
cnf(251,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[226,4,27,26,3]),
[iquote('0:MRR:226.0,226.1,226.2,226.3,4.0,27.0,26.0,3.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.10 % Problem : GEO173+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.10 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:48:08 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.14/0.37 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.37 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 SPASS derived 219 clauses, backtracked 1 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 154 clauses.
% 0.14/0.37 SPASS allocated 85224 KBytes.
% 0.14/0.37 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.14/0.37 0:00:00.02 for the input.
% 0.14/0.37 0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.14/0.37 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.14/0.37 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.14/0.37 0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 12 :
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37 Formulae used in the proof : con ci1 ci2 cu1
% 0.14/0.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------