TSTP Solution File: GEO173+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GEO173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.57s 1.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 10 unt; 10 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 14 ~; 19 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 6 >; 6 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 (; 22 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1 > #skF_4
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(distinct_points,type,
distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(intersection_point,type,
intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(convergent_lines,type,
convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $i ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $i ).
tff(distinct_lines,type,
distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_4',type,
'#skF_4': $i ).
tff(f_144,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
& convergent_lines(U,V)
& distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
| apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
tff(f_112,axiom,
! [X,Y,U,V] :
( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
& distinct_lines(U,V) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
| apart_point_and_line(X,V)
| apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
| apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).
tff(f_84,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( distinct_points(X,Y)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).
tff(f_89,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( distinct_points(X,Y)
=> ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).
tff(c_38,plain,
distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).
tff(c_32,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).
tff(c_30,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).
tff(c_182,plain,
! [Y_70,V_71,U_72,X_73] :
( apart_point_and_line(Y_70,V_71)
| apart_point_and_line(Y_70,U_72)
| apart_point_and_line(X_73,V_71)
| apart_point_and_line(X_73,U_72)
| ~ distinct_lines(U_72,V_71)
| ~ distinct_points(X_73,Y_70) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).
tff(c_257,plain,
! [Y_78,X_79] :
( apart_point_and_line(Y_78,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
| apart_point_and_line(Y_78,'#skF_3')
| apart_point_and_line(X_79,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
| apart_point_and_line(X_79,'#skF_3')
| ~ distinct_points(X_79,Y_78) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_182]) ).
tff(c_261,plain,
( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_257]) ).
tff(c_267,plain,
( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
| apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_30,c_261]) ).
tff(c_440,plain,
apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_267]) ).
tff(c_14,plain,
! [X_13,Y_14] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
| ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).
tff(c_447,plain,
~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_440,c_14]) ).
tff(c_453,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_447]) ).
tff(c_454,plain,
apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_267]) ).
tff(c_16,plain,
! [Y_16,X_15] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
| ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).
tff(c_462,plain,
~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_454,c_16]) ).
tff(c_468,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_462]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GEO173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Aug 4 00:39:05 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.57/1.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/1.96
% 3.57/1.96 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.88/1.99
% 3.88/1.99 Inference rules
% 3.88/1.99 ----------------------
% 3.88/1.99 #Ref : 0
% 3.88/1.99 #Sup : 83
% 3.88/1.99 #Fact : 8
% 3.88/1.99 #Define : 0
% 3.88/1.99 #Split : 1
% 3.88/1.99 #Chain : 0
% 3.88/1.99 #Close : 0
% 3.88/1.99
% 3.88/1.99 Ordering : KBO
% 3.88/1.99
% 3.88/1.99 Simplification rules
% 3.88/1.99 ----------------------
% 3.88/1.99 #Subsume : 10
% 3.88/1.99 #Demod : 17
% 3.88/1.99 #Tautology : 15
% 3.88/1.99 #SimpNegUnit : 6
% 3.88/1.99 #BackRed : 0
% 3.88/1.99
% 3.88/1.99 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.88/1.99 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.88/1.99
% 3.88/1.99 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.88/1.99 ----------------------
% 3.88/1.99 Preprocessing : 0.48
% 3.88/1.99 Parsing : 0.27
% 3.88/1.99 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 3.88/1.99 Main loop : 0.42
% 3.88/1.99 Inferencing : 0.17
% 3.88/1.99 Reduction : 0.10
% 3.88/1.99 Demodulation : 0.06
% 3.88/1.99 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.88/1.99 Subsumption : 0.10
% 3.88/1.99 Abstraction : 0.02
% 3.88/1.99 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.88/1.99 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.88/1.99 Total : 0.95
% 3.88/1.99 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.88/1.99 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.88/1.99 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.88/1.99 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------