TSTP Solution File: GEO172+3 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO172+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:17 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.52s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO172+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 21:17:31 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.51/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.52/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.64  
% 0.52/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.52/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.52/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.64  % File     : GEO172+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.52/0.64  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.52/0.64  % Problem  : Uniqueness of constructed points
% 0.52/0.64  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms.
% 0.52/0.64  % English  : If two lines are convergent and there is a point that is
% 0.52/0.64  %            incident with both lines, then this point is equivalent to the
% 0.52/0.64  %            intersection point of these lines.
% 0.52/0.64  
% 0.52/0.64  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.52/0.64  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.52/0.64  %          : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.64  % Source   : [Rat07]
% 0.52/0.64  % Names    : Theorem 3.3 [vPl95]
% 0.52/0.64  
% 0.52/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.52/0.64  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.21 v5.4.0, 0.22 v5.3.0, 0.30 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.21 v4.0.0
% 0.52/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   97 (   0 equ)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of connectives :   89 (  28   ~;  19   |;  15   &)
% 0.52/0.65  %                                         (   5 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  12 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   84 (  84   !;   0   ?)
% 0.52/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  % Comments :
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+1.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+5.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+6.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.52/0.65      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.52/0.65        ( ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 0.52/0.65          & incident_point_and_line(Z,X)
% 0.52/0.65          & incident_point_and_line(Z,Y) )
% 0.52/0.65       => equal_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.65  %ClaNum:50(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.52/0.65  %VarNum:218(SingletonVarNum:98)
% 0.52/0.65  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.52/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.65  %SharedTerms:8
% 0.52/0.65  %goalClause: 1 2 3 7
% 0.52/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.52/0.65  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.52/0.65  [2]P3(a3,a1)
% 0.52/0.65  [3]P3(a3,a2)
% 0.52/0.65  [7]~P6(a3,f4(a1,a2))
% 0.52/0.65  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.52/0.65  [5]~P5(x51,x51)
% 0.52/0.65  [6]~P1(x61,x61)
% 0.52/0.65  [8]~P2(x81,f5(x82,x81))
% 0.52/0.65  [9]~P2(x91,f6(x92,x91))
% 0.52/0.65  [10]~P1(f5(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.52/0.65  [11]~P8(f6(x111,x112),x111)
% 0.52/0.65  [12]P6(x121,x122)+P4(x121,x122)
% 0.52/0.65  [13]P7(x131,x132)+P5(x131,x132)
% 0.52/0.65  [15]P8(x151,x152)+P1(x151,x152)
% 0.52/0.65  [16]P9(x161,x162)+P1(x161,x162)
% 0.52/0.65  [17]P3(x171,x172)+P2(x171,x172)
% 0.52/0.65  [18]P10(x181,x182)+P8(x181,x182)
% 0.52/0.65  [19]~P5(x191,x192)+P1(x191,x192)
% 0.52/0.65  [22]~P6(x221,x222)+~P4(x221,x222)
% 0.52/0.65  [23]~P7(x231,x232)+~P5(x231,x232)
% 0.52/0.65  [24]~P9(x241,x242)+~P1(x241,x242)
% 0.52/0.65  [25]~P3(x251,x252)+~P2(x251,x252)
% 0.52/0.65  [26]~P10(x261,x262)+~P8(x261,x262)
% 0.52/0.65  [46]~P4(x461,x462)+~P2(x462,f7(x461,x462))
% 0.52/0.65  [47]~P4(x471,x472)+~P2(x471,f7(x471,x472))
% 0.52/0.65  [48]~P1(x481,x482)+~P2(f4(x481,x482),x482)
% 0.52/0.65  [49]~P1(x491,x492)+~P2(f4(x491,x492),x491)
% 0.52/0.65  [20]~P12(x202)+~P11(x201)+P11(f5(x201,x202))
% 0.52/0.65  [21]~P12(x212)+~P11(x211)+P11(f6(x211,x212))
% 0.52/0.65  [27]~P4(x273,x271)+P4(x271,x272)+P4(x273,x272)
% 0.52/0.65  [28]~P2(x281,x283)+P4(x281,x282)+P2(x282,x283)
% 0.52/0.65  [29]~P5(x293,x291)+P5(x291,x292)+P5(x293,x292)
% 0.52/0.65  [30]~P1(x303,x301)+P5(x301,x302)+P1(x303,x302)
% 0.52/0.65  [31]~P2(x313,x311)+P5(x311,x312)+P2(x313,x312)
% 0.52/0.65  [32]~P1(x323,x321)+P1(x321,x322)+P1(x323,x322)
% 0.52/0.65  [33]~P1(x333,x332)+P8(x331,x332)+P8(x331,x333)
% 0.52/0.65  [35]~P11(x352)+~P11(x351)+~P1(x351,x352)+P12(f4(x351,x352))
% 0.52/0.65  [36]~P12(x362)+~P12(x361)+~P4(x361,x362)+P11(f7(x361,x362))
% 0.52/0.65  [38]~P1(x381,x383)+~P8(x381,x383)+P1(x381,x382)+P8(x383,x382)
% 0.52/0.65  [39]~P1(x392,x393)+~P8(x392,x393)+P1(x391,x392)+P1(x391,x393)
% 0.52/0.65  [40]~P1(x402,x403)+~P8(x402,x403)+P1(x401,x402)+P8(x401,x403)
% 0.52/0.65  [41]~P1(x413,x411)+~P8(x413,x411)+P1(x411,x412)+P8(x413,x412)
% 0.52/0.65  [42]~P1(x423,x422)+~P8(x423,x422)+P1(x421,x422)+P8(x421,x423)
% 0.52/0.65  [43]~P1(x431,x433)+~P8(x431,x433)+P8(x431,x432)+P8(x433,x432)
% 0.52/0.65  [45]P8(x453,x454)+~P5(x453,x452)+P2(x451,x452)+P2(x451,x453)+P8(x452,x454)
% 0.52/0.65  [50]P2(x504,x503)+~P4(x504,x501)+~P5(x503,x502)+P2(x501,x502)+P2(x501,x503)+P2(x504,x502)
% 0.52/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(69,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     (~P1(x691,x691)),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[6])).
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     (P5(a2,a1)),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,6,69,8,10,11,24,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30])).
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(76,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     (~P2(a3,a1)),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,6,69,2,8,10,11,24,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30,29,25])).
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(78,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a1)),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,6,69,2,8,10,11,24,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30,29,25,49])).
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(80,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     (~P2(f4(a1,a2),a2)),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,6,69,2,8,10,11,24,19,18,17,16,15,13,12,33,32,30,29,25,49,48])).
% 0.52/0.65  cnf(111,plain,
% 0.52/0.65     ($false),
% 0.52/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,7,11,80,78,71,76,15,12,33,50,25]),
% 0.52/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.65  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------