TSTP Solution File: GEO172+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO172+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 8.11s 2.92s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  13 unt;  19 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  22   ~;  33   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (;  42   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ convergent_lines(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).

tff(f_437,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
          & incident_point_and_line(Z,X)
          & incident_point_and_line(Z,Y) )
       => equal_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_421,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

tff(f_406,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_points(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_points(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax1) ).

tff(f_132,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | convergent_lines(X,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq3) ).

tff(f_113,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_100,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci4) ).

tff(f_95,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci3) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X_3] : ~ convergent_lines(X_3,X_3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_1'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_437]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ! [X_93,Y_94] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_93,Y_94)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(X_93,Y_94) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_421]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_108]) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_437]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_437]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_108]) ).

tff(c_143,plain,
    ! [X_113,Y_114] :
      ( equal_points(X_113,Y_114)
      | distinct_points(X_113,Y_114) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_406]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ equal_points('#skF_3',intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_437]) ).

tff(c_151,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_3',intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_94]) ).

tff(c_180,plain,
    ! [X_135,Z_136,Y_137] :
      ( convergent_lines(X_135,Z_136)
      | distinct_lines(Y_137,Z_136)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_135,Y_137) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_132]) ).

tff(c_186,plain,
    ! [Z_136] :
      ( convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_136)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_2',Z_136) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_180]) ).

tff(c_3151,plain,
    ! [Y_367,V_368,U_369,X_370] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_367,V_368)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_367,U_369)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_370,V_368)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_370,U_369)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_369,V_368)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_370,Y_367) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_113]) ).

tff(c_3248,plain,
    ! [Y_377,Z_378,X_379] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_377,Z_378)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_377,'#skF_2')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_379,Z_378)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_379,'#skF_2')
      | ~ distinct_points(X_379,Y_377)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_378) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_3151]) ).

tff(c_3252,plain,
    ! [Z_378] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),Z_378)
      | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),'#skF_2')
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_378)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_2')
      | convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_378) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_151,c_3248]) ).

tff(c_3256,plain,
    ! [Z_378] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),Z_378)
      | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),'#skF_2')
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_378)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_378) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_3252]) ).

tff(c_3560,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),'#skF_2'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3256]) ).

tff(c_20,plain,
    ! [X_19,Y_20] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X_19,Y_20),Y_20)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_19,Y_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).

tff(c_3567,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3560,c_20]) ).

tff(c_3573,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_3567]) ).

tff(c_4640,plain,
    ! [Z_437] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point('#skF_1','#skF_2'),Z_437)
      | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',Z_437)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_437) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3256]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X_17,Y_18] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X_17,Y_18),X_17)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_17,Y_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_95]) ).

tff(c_4663,plain,
    ( ~ convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_2')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_1')
    | convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_1') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4640,c_18]) ).

tff(c_4685,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_3','#skF_1')
    | convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_1') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_4663]) ).

tff(c_4687,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_116,c_4685]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO172+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:28:34 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.11/2.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.23/2.93  
% 8.23/2.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.23/2.98  
% 8.23/2.98  Inference rules
% 8.23/2.98  ----------------------
% 8.23/2.98  #Ref     : 0
% 8.23/2.98  #Sup     : 1075
% 8.23/2.98  #Fact    : 42
% 8.23/2.98  #Define  : 0
% 8.23/2.98  #Split   : 2
% 8.23/2.98  #Chain   : 0
% 8.23/2.98  #Close   : 0
% 8.23/2.98  
% 8.23/2.98  Ordering : KBO
% 8.23/2.98  
% 8.23/2.98  Simplification rules
% 8.23/2.98  ----------------------
% 8.23/2.98  #Subsume      : 123
% 8.23/2.98  #Demod        : 152
% 8.23/2.98  #Tautology    : 109
% 8.23/2.98  #SimpNegUnit  : 5
% 8.23/2.98  #BackRed      : 0
% 8.23/2.98  
% 8.23/2.98  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 8.23/2.98  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 8.23/2.98  
% 8.23/2.98  Timing (in seconds)
% 8.23/2.98  ----------------------
% 8.23/2.99  Preprocessing        : 0.57
% 8.23/2.99  Parsing              : 0.32
% 8.23/2.99  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 8.23/2.99  Main loop            : 1.30
% 8.23/2.99  Inferencing          : 0.44
% 8.23/2.99  Reduction            : 0.34
% 8.23/2.99  Demodulation         : 0.21
% 8.23/2.99  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 8.23/2.99  Subsumption          : 0.36
% 8.23/2.99  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 8.23/2.99  MUC search           : 0.00
% 8.23/2.99  Cooper               : 0.00
% 8.23/2.99  Total                : 1.95
% 8.23/2.99  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 8.23/2.99  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 8.23/2.99  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 8.23/2.99  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------