TSTP Solution File: GEO172+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GEO172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 13 unt; 16 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
convergent_lines(skc5,skc3),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,skc5),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(skc4,skc3),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
~ distinct_lines(u,u),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
~ convergent_lines(u,u),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
distinct_points(skc4,intersection_point(skc5,skc3)),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
| distinct_lines(v,w)
| distinct_lines(u,w) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
| convergent_lines(v,w)
| convergent_lines(u,w) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(u,v),u) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(14,axiom,
( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(u,v),v) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(17,axiom,
( ~ convergent_lines(u,v)
| distinct_lines(v,w)
| convergent_lines(u,w) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(18,axiom,
( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
| ~ distinct_points(w,x)
| apart_point_and_line(x,u)
| apart_point_and_line(x,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,v)
| apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
file('GEO172+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(19,plain,
( convergent_lines(skc3,u)
| convergent_lines(skc5,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,10]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,10.0')] ).
cnf(20,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(skc5,skc3),skc5),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,13]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,13.0')] ).
cnf(21,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(skc5,skc3),skc3),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,14]),
[iquote('0:Res:1.0,14.0')] ).
cnf(29,plain,
( ~ distinct_lines(skc5,u)
| ~ distinct_points(skc4,v)
| apart_point_and_line(v,u)
| apart_point_and_line(v,skc5)
| apart_point_and_line(skc4,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,2]),
[iquote('0:Res:18.2,2.0')] ).
cnf(47,plain,
( convergent_lines(skc5,u)
| convergent_lines(u,v)
| convergent_lines(skc3,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[19,10]),
[iquote('0:Res:19.0,10.0')] ).
cnf(52,plain,
( convergent_lines(skc5,u)
| convergent_lines(u,skc3) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[47,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:47.2,6.0')] ).
cnf(54,plain,
( convergent_lines(u,skc3)
| convergent_lines(u,v)
| convergent_lines(skc5,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,10]),
[iquote('0:Res:52.0,10.0')] ).
cnf(64,plain,
( convergent_lines(u,skc3)
| convergent_lines(u,skc5) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[54,6]),
[iquote('0:Res:54.2,6.0')] ).
cnf(80,plain,
( convergent_lines(u,skc5)
| distinct_lines(skc3,v)
| convergent_lines(u,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,17]),
[iquote('0:Res:64.0,17.0')] ).
cnf(100,plain,
( distinct_lines(skc3,skc5)
| convergent_lines(u,skc5) ),
inference(fac,[status(thm)],[80]),
[iquote('0:Fac:80.0,80.2')] ).
cnf(108,plain,
convergent_lines(u,skc5),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[100]),
[iquote('1:Spt:100.1')] ).
cnf(109,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[108,6]),
[iquote('1:UnC:108.0,6.0')] ).
cnf(110,plain,
distinct_lines(skc3,skc5),
inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[100]),
[iquote('1:Spt:109.0,100.0')] ).
cnf(111,plain,
( distinct_lines(skc5,u)
| distinct_lines(skc3,u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[110,9]),
[iquote('1:Res:110.0,9.0')] ).
cnf(118,plain,
distinct_lines(skc5,skc3),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[111,5]),
[iquote('1:Res:111.1,5.0')] ).
cnf(229,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(skc4,u)
| apart_point_and_line(u,skc3)
| apart_point_and_line(u,skc5)
| apart_point_and_line(skc4,skc3) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[118,29]),
[iquote('1:Res:118.0,29.0')] ).
cnf(232,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(skc4,u)
| apart_point_and_line(u,skc3)
| apart_point_and_line(u,skc5) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[229,3]),
[iquote('1:MRR:229.3,3.0')] ).
cnf(325,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(skc5,skc3),skc3)
| apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(skc5,skc3),skc5) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[7,232]),
[iquote('1:Res:7.0,232.0')] ).
cnf(326,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[325,21,20]),
[iquote('1:MRR:325.0,325.1,21.0,20.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:28:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.48 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 SPASS derived 278 clauses, backtracked 1 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 175 clauses.
% 0.19/0.48 SPASS allocated 85256 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.48 SPASS spent 0:00:00.13 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.48 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.48 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.48 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.48 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.48 0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 Here is a proof with depth 12, length 31 :
% 0.19/0.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 Formulae used in the proof : con apart2 apart3 apart5 ax6 ci3 ci4 ceq3 cu1
% 0.19/0.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------