TSTP Solution File: GEO172+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO172+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:28:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sat Jun 18 01:28:03 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5050.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.19/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 18
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.19/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.19/0.39     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.39     distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39  
% 0.19/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Model 3 [ 1 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.11 sec ----> 117 [binary,116.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 0.19/0.50  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 0.19/0.50  4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 0.19/0.50  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.19/0.50  9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A).
% 0.19/0.50  10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B).
% 0.19/0.50  11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 0.19/0.50  14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|convergent_lines(A,C).
% 0.19/0.50  15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c1,$c3).
% 0.19/0.50  16 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c1,$c2).
% 0.19/0.50  17 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.19/0.50  18 [] {-} distinct_points($c1,intersection_point($c3,$c2)).
% 0.19/0.50  19 [hyper,17,14] {+} distinct_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,A).
% 0.19/0.50  20 [hyper,17,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 0.19/0.50  21 [hyper,18,4] {-} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A).
% 0.19/0.50  23 [hyper,21,1] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 0.19/0.50  25 [hyper,19,11,23,unit_del,16] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 0.19/0.50  76 [hyper,25,3,unit_del,15] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 0.19/0.50  110 [hyper,76,10,20,unit_del,3] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 0.19/0.50  116 [hyper,110,9,20] {-} convergent_lines($c2,$c2).
% 0.19/0.50  117 [binary,116.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.50  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  true clauses given           5      (26.3%)
% 0.19/0.50  false clauses given         14
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.19/0.50     5  1         0
% 0.19/0.50     6  1         0
% 0.19/0.50     9  5         0
% 0.19/0.50    12  2         0
% 0.19/0.50    14  0         8
% 0.19/0.50    17  2         2
% 0.19/0.50    20  5         3
% 0.19/0.50    22  1         0
% 0.19/0.50    23  8         3
% 0.19/0.50    25  2         0
% 0.19/0.50    26  9         0
% 0.19/0.50    28  3         0
% 0.19/0.50  tot:  39        16      (29.1% true)
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Model 3 [ 1 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  Process 5050 finished Sat Jun 18 01:28:03 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------