TSTP Solution File: GEO171+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO171+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:43:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.21s 2.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 6 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ywk10g_9/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ywk10g_9/input.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ywk10g_9/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ywk10g_9/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ywk10g_9/input.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X3) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( distinct_lines(esk1_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_35]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : GEO171+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:26:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.21/2.24 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 5.21/2.24 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.21/2.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 5.21/2.24
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof found!
% 5.21/2.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.21/2.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 5.21/2.24 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 5.21/2.24 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.21/2.24 # Parsed axioms : 48
% 5.21/2.24 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Initial clauses : 48
% 5.21/2.24 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Initial clauses in saturation : 48
% 5.21/2.24 # Processed clauses : 58
% 5.21/2.24 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # ...subsumed : 7
% 5.21/2.24 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 5.21/2.24 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Generated clauses : 47
% 5.21/2.24 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 33
% 5.21/2.24 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 5.21/2.24 # Paramodulations : 47
% 5.21/2.24 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 5.21/2.24 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 5.21/2.24 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 5.21/2.24 # Non-unit-clauses : 39
% 5.21/2.24 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 5.21/2.24 # ...number of literals in the above : 65
% 5.21/2.24 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 278
% 5.21/2.24 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 155
% 5.21/2.24 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 5.21/2.24 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 5.21/2.24 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.21/2.24 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1479
% 5.21/2.24
% 5.21/2.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.21/2.24 # User time : 0.010 s
% 5.21/2.24 # System time : 0.001 s
% 5.21/2.24 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 5.21/2.24 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 5.21/2.24 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 5.21/2.24 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 5.21/2.24
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------