TSTP Solution File: GEO171+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO171+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GEO171+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:55:44 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % File : GEO171+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.19/0.60 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.19/0.60 % Problem : Uniqueness of constructed lines
% 0.19/0.60 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.60 % English :
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.19/0.60 % : [Li97] Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.19/0.60 % : [Li98] Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.19/0.60 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.19/0.60 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.19/0.60 % Names :
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.19/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of atoms : 36 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of connectives : 26 ( 3 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% 0.19/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.19/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of variables : 32 ( 32 !; 0 ?)
% 0.19/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 % Comments : Shortened axioms Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.19/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.19/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.19/0.60 ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.60 => distinct_lines(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.60 %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.60 %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.19/0.60 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.19/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.60 %SharedTerms:4
% 0.19/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.19/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.19/0.60 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.19/0.60 [2]~P3(a1,a2)
% 0.19/0.60 [3]~P4(x31,x31)
% 0.19/0.60 [4]~P3(x41,x41)
% 0.19/0.60 [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.19/0.60 [6]~P1(x61,x62)+P3(x61,x62)
% 0.19/0.60 [7]~P4(x73,x71)+P4(x71,x72)+P4(x73,x72)
% 0.19/0.60 [8]~P2(x81,x83)+P4(x81,x82)+P2(x82,x83)
% 0.19/0.60 [9]~P3(x93,x91)+P3(x91,x92)+P3(x93,x92)
% 0.19/0.60 [10]~P2(x103,x101)+P3(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)
% 0.19/0.60 [11]~P1(x113,x111)+P1(x111,x112)+P1(x113,x112)
% 0.19/0.60 [12]~P1(x122,x123)+~P2(x121,x123)+P4(x121,f3(x122,x123))
% 0.19/0.60 [13]~P1(x132,x133)+~P2(x131,x132)+P4(x131,f3(x132,x133))
% 0.19/0.60 [14]P4(x141,x142)+~P4(x143,x142)+~P2(x141,f4(x143,x142))
% 0.19/0.60 [15]P4(x151,x152)+~P4(x152,x153)+~P2(x151,f4(x152,x153))
% 0.19/0.60 [16]P2(x164,x163)+~P4(x164,x161)+~P3(x163,x162)+P2(x161,x162)+P2(x161,x163)+P2(x164,x162)
% 0.19/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.60 ($false),
% 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6]),
% 0.19/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------