TSTP Solution File: GEO170+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO170+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:22:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.38s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  10 unt;   4 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    distinct_points(skc5,skc3),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    incident_point_and_line(skc5,skc4),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    incident_point_and_line(skc3,skc4),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ equal_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( equal_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | ~ incident_point_and_line(u,v) ),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(u,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_points(u,v)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(v,line_connecting(u,v)) ),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ distinct_points(w,x)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(x,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(w,u) ),
    file('GEO170+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,27]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,27.0')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc5,skc4),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,27]),
    [iquote('0:Res:2.0,27.0')] ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,50.0')] ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,32]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,32.0')] ).

cnf(57,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,33]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,33.0')] ).

cnf(59,plain,
    distinct_lines(skc4,line_connecting(skc5,skc3)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:17.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(880,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(skc3,skc4)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,line_connecting(skc5,skc3))
    | apart_point_and_line(skc5,skc4) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[59,53]),
    [iquote('0:Res:59.0,53.0')] ).

cnf(892,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[880,51,57,56,52]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:880.0,880.1,880.2,880.3,51.0,57.0,56.0,52.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO170+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 15:41:17 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.38/0.54  
% 0.38/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.38/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.38/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.38/0.54  SPASS derived 825 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 547 clauses.
% 0.38/0.54  SPASS allocated 98159 KBytes.
% 0.38/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.18 on the problem.
% 0.38/0.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.38/0.54  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.38/0.54  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.38/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.38/0.54  		0:00:00.07 for the reduction.
% 0.38/0.54  
% 0.38/0.54  
% 0.38/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 17 :
% 0.38/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : con ax2 a4 ci1 ci2 cu1
% 0.38/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------