TSTP Solution File: GEO170+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO170+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:24 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.77s 2.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  13 unt;  19 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  19   ~;  20   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (;  29   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_436,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & incident_point_and_line(X,Z)
          & incident_point_and_line(Y,Z) )
       => equal_lines(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_420,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

tff(f_410,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_100,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_98,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ! [X_93,Y_94] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_93,Y_94)
      | ~ incident_point_and_line(X_93,Y_94) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_420]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_108]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    incident_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_108]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    ! [X_105,Y_106] :
      ( equal_lines(X_105,Y_106)
      | distinct_lines(X_105,Y_106) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_410]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ equal_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_135,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_94]) ).

tff(c_3102,plain,
    ! [Y_452,V_453,U_454,X_455] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_452,V_453)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_452,U_454)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_455,V_453)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_455,U_454)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_454,V_453)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_455,Y_452) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_3224,plain,
    ! [Y_462,X_463] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_462,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_462,'#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_463,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_463,'#skF_3')
      | ~ distinct_points(X_463,Y_462) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_3102]) ).

tff(c_3294,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2','#skF_3')
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_3224]) ).

tff(c_3377,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_115,c_3294]) ).

tff(c_3378,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3377]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_3385,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3378,c_14]) ).

tff(c_3391,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_3385]) ).

tff(c_3392,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3377]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_3400,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3392,c_16]) ).

tff(c_3406,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_100,c_3400]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GEO170+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 01:16:56 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.77/2.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.77/2.58  
% 6.77/2.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.77/2.61  
% 6.77/2.61  Inference rules
% 6.77/2.61  ----------------------
% 6.77/2.61  #Ref     : 0
% 6.77/2.61  #Sup     : 700
% 6.77/2.61  #Fact    : 66
% 6.77/2.61  #Define  : 0
% 6.77/2.61  #Split   : 3
% 6.77/2.61  #Chain   : 0
% 6.77/2.61  #Close   : 0
% 6.77/2.61  
% 6.77/2.61  Ordering : KBO
% 6.77/2.61  
% 6.77/2.61  Simplification rules
% 6.77/2.61  ----------------------
% 6.77/2.61  #Subsume      : 88
% 6.77/2.61  #Demod        : 112
% 6.77/2.61  #Tautology    : 121
% 6.77/2.61  #SimpNegUnit  : 41
% 6.77/2.61  #BackRed      : 0
% 6.77/2.61  
% 6.77/2.61  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.77/2.61  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.77/2.61  
% 6.77/2.61  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.77/2.61  ----------------------
% 6.77/2.61  Preprocessing        : 0.54
% 6.77/2.61  Parsing              : 0.30
% 6.77/2.61  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 6.77/2.61  Main loop            : 1.00
% 6.77/2.61  Inferencing          : 0.37
% 6.77/2.61  Reduction            : 0.26
% 6.77/2.61  Demodulation         : 0.16
% 6.77/2.61  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 6.77/2.61  Subsumption          : 0.26
% 6.77/2.61  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 6.77/2.61  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.77/2.61  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.77/2.61  Total                : 1.59
% 6.77/2.61  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.77/2.61  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.77/2.61  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.77/2.61  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------