TSTP Solution File: GEO170+2 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO170+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO170+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 19:22:28 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.19/0.59  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.59  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  % File     : GEO170+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.19/0.60  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.19/0.60  % Problem  : Uniqueness of constructed lines
% 0.19/0.60  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.19/0.60  % English  : If two distinct points are incident with a line, then this line
% 0.19/0.60  %            is equivalent with the connecting line of these points.
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.19/0.60  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.19/0.60  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.19/0.60  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.19/0.60  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.19/0.60  % Names    :
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.19/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.19/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   38 (   0 equ)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Number of connectives :   31 (   6   ~;   9   |;   4   &)
% 0.19/0.60  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.60  %            Number of variables   :   33 (  33   !;   0   ?)
% 0.19/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.19/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.19/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.19/0.60        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.60          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Z)
% 0.19/0.60          & ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,Z) )
% 0.19/0.60       => ~ distinct_lines(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.60  %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.60  %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.19/0.60  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.19/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.19/0.60  %SharedTerms:8
% 0.19/0.60  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4
% 0.19/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.19/0.60  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.19/0.60  [3]~P3(a1,a3)
% 0.19/0.60  [4]~P3(a2,a3)
% 0.19/0.60  [2]P2(a3,f4(a1,a2))
% 0.19/0.60  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.19/0.60  [6]~P2(x61,x61)
% 0.19/0.60  [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 0.19/0.60  [8]~P4(x81,x82)+P2(x81,x82)
% 0.19/0.60  [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 0.19/0.60  [10]~P3(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P3(x102,x103)
% 0.19/0.60  [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P2(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.19/0.60  [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P2(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 0.19/0.60  [13]~P4(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P4(x133,x132)
% 0.19/0.60  [14]~P4(x142,x143)+~P3(x141,x143)+P1(x141,f5(x142,x143))
% 0.19/0.60  [15]~P4(x152,x153)+~P3(x151,x152)+P1(x151,f5(x152,x153))
% 0.19/0.60  [16]P1(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x162)+~P3(x161,f4(x163,x162))
% 0.19/0.60  [17]P1(x171,x172)+~P1(x172,x173)+~P3(x171,f4(x172,x173))
% 0.19/0.60  [18]P3(x184,x183)+~P1(x184,x181)+~P2(x183,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x183)+P3(x184,x182)
% 0.19/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.60  
% 0.19/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.60     (~P1(x221,x221)),
% 0.19/0.60     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.19/0.60  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.19/0.60     (~P3(a1,f4(a1,a2))),
% 0.19/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,22,6,2,11,9,17])).
% 0.19/0.60  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.60     (~P1(x251,x251)),
% 0.19/0.60     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.19/0.60  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.19/0.60     (~P3(a2,f4(a1,a2))),
% 0.19/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,22,25,6,2,11,9,17,16])).
% 0.19/0.60  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.60     ($false),
% 0.19/0.60     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,2,27,24,18]),
% 0.19/0.60     ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.60  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.60  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------