TSTP Solution File: GEO148-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO148-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:31:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(homogeneous_behaviour_13,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',homogeneous_behaviour_13) ).
cnf(t14_159,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,sk30),at(sk29,sk31))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',t14_159) ).
cnf(connect_defn_1,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3)))
| ~ connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',connect_defn_1) ).
cnf(t14_158,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),sk27,sk30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',t14_158) ).
cnf(t14_156,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',t14_156) ).
cnf(t14_157,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,sk27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p',t14_157) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4) ),
homogeneous_behaviour_13 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,sk30),at(sk29,sk31))),
t14_159 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,X1),at(sk29,X2)))
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,X2)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),X1,sk30) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3)))
| ~ connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
connect_defn_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ connect(sk28,sk29,X1)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,X1)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),X1,sk30) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),sk27,sk30),
t14_158 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
t14_156 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,sk27),
t14_157 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : GEO148-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:13:08 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iDNfDZNFk2/E---3.1_12724.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 12803 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12806 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FHHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 114
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 96
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 45
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 34
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 34
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 30
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 89
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1785
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1868 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------