TSTP Solution File: GEO147+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.75s 6.97s
% Output : Refutation 6.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : GEO147+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:06:31 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.33 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.33 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.33 Sat Jun 18 07:06:31 2022
% 0.16/0.33 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 742.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.33 set(auto).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.33 clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 formula_list(usable).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.16/0.33 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.16/0.33 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.16/0.33 clauses in usable.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.16/0.33 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 84 during input processing: 0 [] {-} once(at_the_same_time(A,B))| -once(at_the_same_time(B,A)).
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.33 Following clause subsumed by 132 during input processing: 0 [copy,132,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 118.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 115.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 114.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 111.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 110.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 104.
% 0.16/0.33 132 back subsumes 103.
% 0.16/0.33
% 0.16/0.33 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.90/1.15 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.90/1.15 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.90/1.15 number of clauses in intial UL: 100
% 0.90/1.15 number of clauses initially in problem: 124
% 0.90/1.15 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.90/1.15 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 84
% 0.90/1.15 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.90/1.15 absolute distinct symbol count: 50
% 0.90/1.15 distinct predicate count: 16
% 0.90/1.15 distinct function count: 31
% 0.90/1.15 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15
% 0.90/1.15 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68 Changing weight limit from 60 to 50.
% 3.50/3.68
% 3.50/3.68 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 30 givens.
% 3.50/3.68
% 4.38/4.57
% 4.38/4.57
% 4.38/4.57 Changing weight limit from 50 to 47.
% 4.38/4.57
% 4.38/4.57 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 35 givens.
% 4.38/4.57
% 5.31/5.48
% 5.31/5.48
% 5.31/5.48 Changing weight limit from 47 to 44.
% 5.31/5.48
% 5.31/5.48 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 40 givens.
% 5.31/5.48
% 6.22/6.42
% 6.22/6.42
% 6.22/6.42 Changing weight limit from 44 to 40.
% 6.22/6.42
% 6.22/6.42 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 45 givens.
% 6.22/6.42
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88 Changing weight limit from 40 to 37.
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 50 givens.
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 -------- PROOF --------
% 6.75/6.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 6.75/6.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 6.62 sec ----> 8115 [hyper,7884,139,7800] {-} $F.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 3.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.75/6.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 6.75/6.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 82 [] {+} -connect(A,B,C)|once(at_the_same_time(at(A,C),at(B,C))).
% 6.75/6.97 88 [] {+} -once(at_the_same_time(A,B))|once(A).
% 6.75/6.97 89 [] {+} -once(at_the_same_time(A,B))|once(B).
% 6.75/6.97 90 [] {-} -once(at(A,B))|incident_o(B,trajectory_of(A)).
% 6.75/6.97 94 [] {-} -incident_o($c3,trajectory_of($c2))| -incident_o($c3,trajectory_of($c1)).
% 6.75/6.97 130,129 [] {-} trajectory_of(A)=$f25(A).
% 6.75/6.97 131 [] {-} connect($c2,$c1,$c3).
% 6.75/6.97 139 [back_demod,94,demod,130,130] {-} -incident_o($c3,$f25($c2))| -incident_o($c3,$f25($c1)).
% 6.75/6.97 142 [back_demod,90,demod,130] {-} -once(at(A,B))|incident_o(B,$f25(A)).
% 6.75/6.97 965 [hyper,131,82] {-} once(at_the_same_time(at($c2,$c3),at($c1,$c3))).
% 6.75/6.97 7613 [hyper,965,89] {-} once(at($c1,$c3)).
% 6.75/6.97 7614 [hyper,965,88] {-} once(at($c2,$c3)).
% 6.75/6.97 7800 [hyper,7613,142] {-} incident_o($c3,$f25($c1)).
% 6.75/6.97 7884 [hyper,7614,142] {-} incident_o($c3,$f25($c2)).
% 6.75/6.97 8115 [hyper,7884,139,7800] {-} $F.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.75/6.97 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 ============ end of search ============
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.75/6.97
% 6.75/6.97 Process 742 finished Sat Jun 18 07:06:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------